Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for October, 2012

"Let President Sirleaf understand that she must separate the Presidency from family"

Ex-Speaker of the Liberian House of Representatives Edwin Snowe, held a press conference recently, and told the Liberian people and the world what most Liberians have expressed over the years about nepotism and corruption in the Sirleaf administration. Snowe went even further by revealing in brutal details the lack of transparency in the negotiation of oil deals, the influence of presidential son, Robert Sirleaf, who currently runs NOCAL, and also revealed what appears to be the hijacking of NOCAL by the Sirleaf clan.

Below is the full text of Rep. Snowe’s statement at the Tuesday news conference.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, Good Afternoon!

Today, in fulfillment of my obligation to my District and the Liberian people as well as in defense of my reputation, I’ve come to address this press conference regarding a range of National as well as personal issues.

Over the last few months, there have been claims and counter claims between the Legislative and Executive Branches of our Government with specific reference to the administration of the Oil and Gas Sector by the National Oil Company of Liberia, (NOCAL).

Of late, the Liberian people have read articles and listened to accusations and character assassination; in particular, a talk show aired on a radio station owned by the Vice President for Communications of NOCAL, against members of the National Legislature. Against this background, I’ve come today to defend and protect my character and to elevate the public debate surrounding activities at NOCAL.

About a year ago when I decided to support the reelection of Madam Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, I did not do it for personal benefit or greed, neither did I do it in exchange for oil block as been speculated in some quarters. I supported Madam Sirleaf based on my personal conviction in promoting democracy and stability in Liberia.

This is why I can proudly and publicly challenge anybody, be it Madam Sirleaf, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, the campaign team, or anyone associated with the campaign for the reelection of Madam Sirleaf, that a dime was given me to endorse or campaign for the President or even campaign for myself. I campaigned with the President in all fifteen (15) counties, at times, I even did so without the President, whilst at the same time campaigning for my reelection in my District. All this was done 100% at my own expense.

In May of 2011, I was approached by Gazprom (a giant Russian Oil and Gas Company) to explore the possibility of investing in the Liberian Oil and Gas Sector with specific reference to Block 13. Gazprom was one of the two preferred bidders recommended by Peppercoast, the owner of Block 13 on a mandated sale of the block by then CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Christopher Neyor.

Gazprom had made an offer of $100 million for the block where the Government of Liberia take would have been $27 million and $15 million to NOCAL as transaction fee but while it was obvious that Canadian Overseas Petroleum Limited (COPL) did not meet the three qualification criteria set by NOCAL and Gazprom did, NOCAL delayed any approval as requested and required under the Peppercoast Petroleum Sharing Agreement. This was when Gazprom approached me to find out what was going on. Gazprom, which is also a major power producer, also offered to come in with expanded electricity for Monrovia within just few months.

I immediately proceeded to President Sirleaf and informed her about the request made to me by Gazprom. President Sirleaf in response, amongst other things, informed me that because of the location of block 13, being situated between blocks 12 and 14, which are owned by Chevron, a US company, it was impossible to have a Russian company situated between the two blocks.

After months of discussions, the President along with her Senior Advisor, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, who happens to be her son, agreed to meet with Gazprom. Thereafter, an invitation was extended to Gazprom to visit Liberia. The Chief Executive Officer of Gazprom flew to Liberia and a meeting was held at the residence of the president, notably in the absence of the then President/CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Christopher Neyor.

Upon our arrival at the residence of the president, we were met by Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, who immediately proceeded with the guest into the residence of the president for closed door discussions while I was ushered a seat outside in the palava hut. That was when I realized that the Oil and Gas Sector of Liberia was at threat of being a family affair. I felt humiliated and was deeply saddened.

After learning that negotiations for block 13 were being held, and that only the President/CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Neyor and one member of the Board of NOCAL who again happened to be Mr. Robert Sirleaf along with his American lawyer, Mr. Jeff Woods were in the know at the level of NOCAL, I decided to question this process.

Why was Mr. Clemenceau Urey who was Chairman of the Board of NOCAL at the time not copied? Why is Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf the only member of the Board of NOCAL in the know of this transaction?

Mr. Robert Sirleaf, who absolutely has no knowledge of how the international oil and gas sector operates, wanted to force NOCAL to give Block 13 to Chevron at half the amount offered by Gazprom even when Chevron had not participated in the bid for the block, it was the National Legislature with its budgetary and oversight power that mandated that Block 13 be disposed off with no less than $27 million to the government treasury. This is how ExxonMobil made a counter offer that may now bring $45 million to our government. Thanks to the National Legislature for its oversight.

Now let’s discuss what started last week into this week while I was away visiting family and friends. During my absence, some serious accusations were levied against the Honorable Speaker, the President Pro Temp of the Liberian Senate, several of my colleagues and I from the House of Representatives by Mr. Henry Costa (a local radio talk show host), all in an attempt to assassinate my character based on falsehood.

For the record, at no time have I met and/or discussed with President Sirleaf or her Senior Advisor who is also the Chairman of the Board of NOCAL nor have I asked anyone to request an oil block from the President or her son, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf. I don’t know of any discussion with the President or her son regarding any oil block which would lead to blackmailing as printed by the “FrontPage Africa” newspaper. I hereby openly in this public manner challenge anyone to prove the contrary.

I am aware that Mr. Costa was issued a US visa through the instrumentality of the “Executive” and was expected to travel during the same time the President visited the US to address the UN General Assembly. Mr. Costa was instructed by his principals at NOCAL to delay his trip until early November and carry on their planned attack against members of the Legislature. Let me take this time to bid Mr. Costa farewell and a safe travel to the United States in the coming days having accomplished his mission.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, from where I am positioned, I am aware of plans by NOCAL to dish out thousands of United States dollars to SOME media institutions (both electronic and print) in a campaign to confuse the minds of the public by discrediting the Legislature, especially the House of Representatives who have been very vocal about reform at NOCAL. This campaign is also intended to further discredit credible documented evidence of Mr. Robert Sirleaf’s “so called pro bono” activities at the National Oil Company.

We have explicit confidence in the Liberian media and have confidence that you will remain resolute in exposing the ills in our society. We know that no attempt will make you bury the truth.

Fellow Liberians, the issue at NOCAL is of grave concern and must be addressed immediately. Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, son of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Senior Advisor to the President of the Republic of Liberia, So Called “Pro Bono Executive Chairman” of the Board of Directors of NOCAL and a taxpaying citizen of the United States of America with US Passport number; 2181983813, issued June 7, 2006, receives thousands of US dollars representing per diem, first class air ticket, five star hotel bills inclusive of entertainment and incidental payments for each and every trip made in the name of NOCAL. Attached are a few supporting documents for your review.

Most of these payments are not determined by any set policy at NOCAL. After these trips, Mr. Sirleaf gives instructions that reimbursement payments for his “pro bono services” be made to his Wells Fargo account number; 4000823640, in the United States.

As far as I know, board Chairpersons in Liberia are not paid anyway, so why call your services “pro bono” when you are receiving everything other board chairs are receiving, plus more? Why would Mr. Sirleaf try to play on the intelligence of the Liberian people?

Mr. Robert Sirleaf, is also in violation of the Aliens and Nationality Law of the Republic of Liberia. The Liberian Codes Revised, VOL. II: Chapter 22; Page 193. Loss of Citizenship; 22.1. Acts Causing Loss of Citizenship.
From and after the effective date of this title, a person who is a citizen of Liberia whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his citizenship by;

(a) Obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application, upon the application of a duly authorized agent, or through the naturalization of a parent having legal custody of such person; provided that citizenship shall not be lost by any person under this section as the result of the naturalization of a parent or parents while such person is under the age of 21 years, unless such person shall fail to enter Liberia to establish a permanent residence prior to his twenty-third birthday.

Mr. Sirleaf holds a Liberian Diplomatic Passport number; D 000189. Issued December 2, 2009, which puts him in a dual citizen capacity. The laws of Liberia do not grant dual citizenship.

I am therefore calling on President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to immediately discharge Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf from all activities of the Government of Liberia and have him turned over to the Ministry of Justice for prosecution.

Fellow Liberians, the danger in this situation, with Mr. Sirleaf, a US citizen, serving as Senior Advisor to the President of the Republic of Liberia, and so called pro bono Chairman of the Board of NOCAL is that, it is possible that in the event of any dubious or advert issue against the interest of the Republic (which is now emanating at NOCAL under Mr. Sirleaf’s chairmanship), the Government will lack the authority to prosecute Mr. Sirleaf because he will take off to his country of citizenship, the United States of America.

After single handedly appointing all of the members of the Board of NOCAL, Mr. Sirleaf now refers to himself as “Executive Chairman” of the Board of NOCAL which is in complete violation of the act that created NOCAL which calls for a “Chairman of the Board” and not an Executive Chairman. Moreover, there is not one person on the NOCAL Board of Directors as constituted by Mr. Sirleaf with any hydrocarbon or energy expertise as required by the Act creating NOCAL.

One of the issues raised in the Front Page Africa newspaper and on the Costa Show, was that of “PEP” (Politically Exposed Persons), a regulation found in Section 312 of the US Patriotic Act. What Front Page Africa and the Costa Show failed to tell the Liberian people is that after the passage of the PEP, another mechanism was put into place as a cover up for the PEPs, which is referred to as SPV/SPE (Special Purpose Vehicle/Special Purpose Entity) to protect the interest of such persons.

This Special Purpose Vehicle/Entity is intended to shield the commercial interest of those people by giving them the opportunity to establish foundations, trusts, funds, clubs etc. under the disguise of charity work. Take a look around here today, we have the “Robert A. Sirleaf Foundation”, Robert A. Sirleaf Barrack Youth Club, Robert A. Sirleaf Social Work Fund, and as expected, the Robert A. Sirleaf Young Boys Fund.

Most of the 10 million United States dollars from Chevron social funds was spent through those SPV’s. We hope that somewhere in Mr. Sirleaf social work; he will create avenues to assist the young girls of Liberia as well.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, we are aware that today there is a major conspiracy to remove the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. J. Alex Tyler, Sr., as was done with the Edwin Snowe leadership. We want to make it emphatically clear to the perpetrators to beware that this time around, their conspiracy could fall at their door steps. “A hint to the wise is quite sufficient.”

I want to call on members of the National Legislature, especially the members of the Honorable House of Representatives, to remain steadfast, unified and far sighted; to steer the course as we provide oversight of the Executive in the interest of the Liberian people. This is our responsibility and so let us not let our fellow citizens down.

Finally: In 2011 when the Liberian people went to the polls to vote for president, we voted for Madam Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf as President of the Republic of Liberia and not Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf. The involvement of Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf in running the day-to-day affairs of the state is a cancer that is creeping in as a threat to our hard-earned political dispensation.

Mr. Sirleaf masterminded the removal of two eminent Liberian citizens who are highly qualified (Dr. Foday Kromah and Mr. Christopher Neyor) from NOCAL because he could not push them around. We are informed of cases where Mr. Sirleaf told a certain Cabinet Minister during negotiations with Chevron that the Minister had his marching orders and that the minister should proceed in doing what he (Robert Sirleaf) wanted done against the professional advice of that Minister.

There have been other instances where Cabinet Ministers and other Senior Government officials have been subjected to thorough security searches as well as leaving their cellphones and pens outside before entering Mr. Sirleaf’s public office.

Mr. Sirleaf drives two bullet proof Toyota Land Cruiser vehicles with private plates and is escorted by armed EPS (SSS) personnel in an EPS (SSS) pilot vehicle. Other than the President, neither the Vice President, the Speaker of the House, the Chief Justice nor the President Pro Temp of the Senate rides in a bullet proof vehicle. It leaves one to wonder if the safety or security of Mr. Sirleaf is more important then the Vice President of the Republic of Liberia and those others mentioned.

It is important for President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to retrospect the cases of Saddam Hussein and the involvement of his sons in running the affairs of Iraq; Col. Maummar Gaddafi and the involvement of his sons in running the affairs of Libya; Hussein Mubarak and sons in running the affairs of Egypt and our own next door neighbor of Senegal, Abdoulaye Wade and his son in running the affairs of Senegal, to name a few.

Let President Sirleaf understand that she must separate the Presidency from family. We saw official photos from Japan where the president and her son and another family member were at the head table at an official meeting whilst senior ministers of government were in the back. A few days later after it was noticed, the photo disappeared from the Front Page Africa website.

Liberia is not the newly formed monarchy in West Africa nor is Liberia the next Equatorial Guinea where the son of the president is also his vice president with oversight of the oil sector.

Ladies and gentleman of the press, I thank you for coming and I look forward to inviting you shortly to more press conferences as the debate continues. As we continue with Mr. Sirleaf’s role at NOCAL, we will also be looking at other handpicked executives at NOCAL with supporting documents of their stewardship.

“Let President Sirleaf understand that she must separate the Presidency from family”

Ex-Speaker of the Liberian House of Representatives Edwin Snowe, held a press conference recently, and told the Liberian people and the world what most Liberians have expressed over the years about nepotism and corruption in the Sirleaf administration. Snowe went even further by revealing in brutal details the lack of transparency in the negotiation of oil deals, the influence of presidential son, Robert Sirleaf, who currently runs NOCAL, and also revealed what appears to be the hijacking of NOCAL by the Sirleaf clan.

Below is the full text of Rep. Snowe’s statement at the Tuesday news conference.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, Good Afternoon!

Today, in fulfillment of my obligation to my District and the Liberian people as well as in defense of my reputation, I’ve come to address this press conference regarding a range of National as well as personal issues.

Over the last few months, there have been claims and counter claims between the Legislative and Executive Branches of our Government with specific reference to the administration of the Oil and Gas Sector by the National Oil Company of Liberia, (NOCAL).

Of late, the Liberian people have read articles and listened to accusations and character assassination; in particular, a talk show aired on a radio station owned by the Vice President for Communications of NOCAL, against members of the National Legislature. Against this background, I’ve come today to defend and protect my character and to elevate the public debate surrounding activities at NOCAL.

About a year ago when I decided to support the reelection of Madam Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, I did not do it for personal benefit or greed, neither did I do it in exchange for oil block as been speculated in some quarters. I supported Madam Sirleaf based on my personal conviction in promoting democracy and stability in Liberia.

This is why I can proudly and publicly challenge anybody, be it Madam Sirleaf, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, the campaign team, or anyone associated with the campaign for the reelection of Madam Sirleaf, that a dime was given me to endorse or campaign for the President or even campaign for myself. I campaigned with the President in all fifteen (15) counties, at times, I even did so without the President, whilst at the same time campaigning for my reelection in my District. All this was done 100% at my own expense.

In May of 2011, I was approached by Gazprom (a giant Russian Oil and Gas Company) to explore the possibility of investing in the Liberian Oil and Gas Sector with specific reference to Block 13. Gazprom was one of the two preferred bidders recommended by Peppercoast, the owner of Block 13 on a mandated sale of the block by then CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Christopher Neyor.

Gazprom had made an offer of $100 million for the block where the Government of Liberia take would have been $27 million and $15 million to NOCAL as transaction fee but while it was obvious that Canadian Overseas Petroleum Limited (COPL) did not meet the three qualification criteria set by NOCAL and Gazprom did, NOCAL delayed any approval as requested and required under the Peppercoast Petroleum Sharing Agreement. This was when Gazprom approached me to find out what was going on. Gazprom, which is also a major power producer, also offered to come in with expanded electricity for Monrovia within just few months.

I immediately proceeded to President Sirleaf and informed her about the request made to me by Gazprom. President Sirleaf in response, amongst other things, informed me that because of the location of block 13, being situated between blocks 12 and 14, which are owned by Chevron, a US company, it was impossible to have a Russian company situated between the two blocks.

After months of discussions, the President along with her Senior Advisor, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, who happens to be her son, agreed to meet with Gazprom. Thereafter, an invitation was extended to Gazprom to visit Liberia. The Chief Executive Officer of Gazprom flew to Liberia and a meeting was held at the residence of the president, notably in the absence of the then President/CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Christopher Neyor.

Upon our arrival at the residence of the president, we were met by Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, who immediately proceeded with the guest into the residence of the president for closed door discussions while I was ushered a seat outside in the palava hut. That was when I realized that the Oil and Gas Sector of Liberia was at threat of being a family affair. I felt humiliated and was deeply saddened.

After learning that negotiations for block 13 were being held, and that only the President/CEO of NOCAL, Mr. Neyor and one member of the Board of NOCAL who again happened to be Mr. Robert Sirleaf along with his American lawyer, Mr. Jeff Woods were in the know at the level of NOCAL, I decided to question this process.

Why was Mr. Clemenceau Urey who was Chairman of the Board of NOCAL at the time not copied? Why is Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf the only member of the Board of NOCAL in the know of this transaction?

Mr. Robert Sirleaf, who absolutely has no knowledge of how the international oil and gas sector operates, wanted to force NOCAL to give Block 13 to Chevron at half the amount offered by Gazprom even when Chevron had not participated in the bid for the block, it was the National Legislature with its budgetary and oversight power that mandated that Block 13 be disposed off with no less than $27 million to the government treasury. This is how ExxonMobil made a counter offer that may now bring $45 million to our government. Thanks to the National Legislature for its oversight.

Now let’s discuss what started last week into this week while I was away visiting family and friends. During my absence, some serious accusations were levied against the Honorable Speaker, the President Pro Temp of the Liberian Senate, several of my colleagues and I from the House of Representatives by Mr. Henry Costa (a local radio talk show host), all in an attempt to assassinate my character based on falsehood.

For the record, at no time have I met and/or discussed with President Sirleaf or her Senior Advisor who is also the Chairman of the Board of NOCAL nor have I asked anyone to request an oil block from the President or her son, Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf. I don’t know of any discussion with the President or her son regarding any oil block which would lead to blackmailing as printed by the “FrontPage Africa” newspaper. I hereby openly in this public manner challenge anyone to prove the contrary.

I am aware that Mr. Costa was issued a US visa through the instrumentality of the “Executive” and was expected to travel during the same time the President visited the US to address the UN General Assembly. Mr. Costa was instructed by his principals at NOCAL to delay his trip until early November and carry on their planned attack against members of the Legislature. Let me take this time to bid Mr. Costa farewell and a safe travel to the United States in the coming days having accomplished his mission.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, from where I am positioned, I am aware of plans by NOCAL to dish out thousands of United States dollars to SOME media institutions (both electronic and print) in a campaign to confuse the minds of the public by discrediting the Legislature, especially the House of Representatives who have been very vocal about reform at NOCAL. This campaign is also intended to further discredit credible documented evidence of Mr. Robert Sirleaf’s “so called pro bono” activities at the National Oil Company.

We have explicit confidence in the Liberian media and have confidence that you will remain resolute in exposing the ills in our society. We know that no attempt will make you bury the truth.

Fellow Liberians, the issue at NOCAL is of grave concern and must be addressed immediately. Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf, son of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Senior Advisor to the President of the Republic of Liberia, So Called “Pro Bono Executive Chairman” of the Board of Directors of NOCAL and a taxpaying citizen of the United States of America with US Passport number; 2181983813, issued June 7, 2006, receives thousands of US dollars representing per diem, first class air ticket, five star hotel bills inclusive of entertainment and incidental payments for each and every trip made in the name of NOCAL. Attached are a few supporting documents for your review.

Most of these payments are not determined by any set policy at NOCAL. After these trips, Mr. Sirleaf gives instructions that reimbursement payments for his “pro bono services” be made to his Wells Fargo account number; 4000823640, in the United States.

As far as I know, board Chairpersons in Liberia are not paid anyway, so why call your services “pro bono” when you are receiving everything other board chairs are receiving, plus more? Why would Mr. Sirleaf try to play on the intelligence of the Liberian people?

Mr. Robert Sirleaf, is also in violation of the Aliens and Nationality Law of the Republic of Liberia. The Liberian Codes Revised, VOL. II: Chapter 22; Page 193. Loss of Citizenship; 22.1. Acts Causing Loss of Citizenship.
From and after the effective date of this title, a person who is a citizen of Liberia whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his citizenship by;

(a) Obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application, upon the application of a duly authorized agent, or through the naturalization of a parent having legal custody of such person; provided that citizenship shall not be lost by any person under this section as the result of the naturalization of a parent or parents while such person is under the age of 21 years, unless such person shall fail to enter Liberia to establish a permanent residence prior to his twenty-third birthday.

Mr. Sirleaf holds a Liberian Diplomatic Passport number; D 000189. Issued December 2, 2009, which puts him in a dual citizen capacity. The laws of Liberia do not grant dual citizenship.

I am therefore calling on President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to immediately discharge Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf from all activities of the Government of Liberia and have him turned over to the Ministry of Justice for prosecution.

Fellow Liberians, the danger in this situation, with Mr. Sirleaf, a US citizen, serving as Senior Advisor to the President of the Republic of Liberia, and so called pro bono Chairman of the Board of NOCAL is that, it is possible that in the event of any dubious or advert issue against the interest of the Republic (which is now emanating at NOCAL under Mr. Sirleaf’s chairmanship), the Government will lack the authority to prosecute Mr. Sirleaf because he will take off to his country of citizenship, the United States of America.

After single handedly appointing all of the members of the Board of NOCAL, Mr. Sirleaf now refers to himself as “Executive Chairman” of the Board of NOCAL which is in complete violation of the act that created NOCAL which calls for a “Chairman of the Board” and not an Executive Chairman. Moreover, there is not one person on the NOCAL Board of Directors as constituted by Mr. Sirleaf with any hydrocarbon or energy expertise as required by the Act creating NOCAL.

One of the issues raised in the Front Page Africa newspaper and on the Costa Show, was that of “PEP” (Politically Exposed Persons), a regulation found in Section 312 of the US Patriotic Act. What Front Page Africa and the Costa Show failed to tell the Liberian people is that after the passage of the PEP, another mechanism was put into place as a cover up for the PEPs, which is referred to as SPV/SPE (Special Purpose Vehicle/Special Purpose Entity) to protect the interest of such persons.

This Special Purpose Vehicle/Entity is intended to shield the commercial interest of those people by giving them the opportunity to establish foundations, trusts, funds, clubs etc. under the disguise of charity work. Take a look around here today, we have the “Robert A. Sirleaf Foundation”, Robert A. Sirleaf Barrack Youth Club, Robert A. Sirleaf Social Work Fund, and as expected, the Robert A. Sirleaf Young Boys Fund.

Most of the 10 million United States dollars from Chevron social funds was spent through those SPV’s. We hope that somewhere in Mr. Sirleaf social work; he will create avenues to assist the young girls of Liberia as well.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Press, we are aware that today there is a major conspiracy to remove the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. J. Alex Tyler, Sr., as was done with the Edwin Snowe leadership. We want to make it emphatically clear to the perpetrators to beware that this time around, their conspiracy could fall at their door steps. “A hint to the wise is quite sufficient.”

I want to call on members of the National Legislature, especially the members of the Honorable House of Representatives, to remain steadfast, unified and far sighted; to steer the course as we provide oversight of the Executive in the interest of the Liberian people. This is our responsibility and so let us not let our fellow citizens down.

Finally: In 2011 when the Liberian people went to the polls to vote for president, we voted for Madam Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf as President of the Republic of Liberia and not Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf. The involvement of Mr. Robert A. Sirleaf in running the day-to-day affairs of the state is a cancer that is creeping in as a threat to our hard-earned political dispensation.

Mr. Sirleaf masterminded the removal of two eminent Liberian citizens who are highly qualified (Dr. Foday Kromah and Mr. Christopher Neyor) from NOCAL because he could not push them around. We are informed of cases where Mr. Sirleaf told a certain Cabinet Minister during negotiations with Chevron that the Minister had his marching orders and that the minister should proceed in doing what he (Robert Sirleaf) wanted done against the professional advice of that Minister.

There have been other instances where Cabinet Ministers and other Senior Government officials have been subjected to thorough security searches as well as leaving their cellphones and pens outside before entering Mr. Sirleaf’s public office.

Mr. Sirleaf drives two bullet proof Toyota Land Cruiser vehicles with private plates and is escorted by armed EPS (SSS) personnel in an EPS (SSS) pilot vehicle. Other than the President, neither the Vice President, the Speaker of the House, the Chief Justice nor the President Pro Temp of the Senate rides in a bullet proof vehicle. It leaves one to wonder if the safety or security of Mr. Sirleaf is more important then the Vice President of the Republic of Liberia and those others mentioned.

It is important for President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to retrospect the cases of Saddam Hussein and the involvement of his sons in running the affairs of Iraq; Col. Maummar Gaddafi and the involvement of his sons in running the affairs of Libya; Hussein Mubarak and sons in running the affairs of Egypt and our own next door neighbor of Senegal, Abdoulaye Wade and his son in running the affairs of Senegal, to name a few.

Let President Sirleaf understand that she must separate the Presidency from family. We saw official photos from Japan where the president and her son and another family member were at the head table at an official meeting whilst senior ministers of government were in the back. A few days later after it was noticed, the photo disappeared from the Front Page Africa website.

Liberia is not the newly formed monarchy in West Africa nor is Liberia the next Equatorial Guinea where the son of the president is also his vice president with oversight of the oil sector.

Ladies and gentleman of the press, I thank you for coming and I look forward to inviting you shortly to more press conferences as the debate continues. As we continue with Mr. Sirleaf’s role at NOCAL, we will also be looking at other handpicked executives at NOCAL with supporting documents of their stewardship.

Liberia must hire this man for the Lone Star job

By Ralph Geeplay

 

Recently, the Liberian national team, Lone Star suffered a humiliating 6-1 defeat at the hands of the Nigerian Super Eagles in Calabar, Nigeria, exposing Coach Kaetu Smith, who once described himself as a “good coach.”

The Liberian Lone Star must hired a foreign coach, appoint Kaetu Smith as the under 23 caretaker and let him coach also in the domestic league. The Liberian Football Association must also give the under 20 or 18 coaching job to Thomas Kodjo, while he’s also coaching in the domestic league.

The Man for the Lone Star job though, is the South Korean manager and coach Huh Jung Moo. The argument can be made that indigenous coaches on the continent are growing in numbers. But Liberia is not Nigeria, or Ghana or South Africa. We have ways to go and the domestic league is no where near those African countries that are doing well as shown in the listed countries above.

Thomas Kodjo, the indigenous Liberian caretaker coach has shown promise and must be commanded for handing Namibia a defeat in Monrovia. That victory advanced Liberia to the Afcons cup preliminary rounds that squared her up against the Super Eagles, bringing home in the process the bronze trophy during the ECOWAS tournament.

But Kodjo, say sports analyst will have to prove himself in the domestic Liberian League to be taken seriously. However, the best of all the foreign coaches was perhaps Antoine Hey, the German national under whose leadership the Liberian national team played even better and looked stronger, but his wins were minuscule.

Had Coach Hey shown patience, the Lone Star would have been a formidable team, say a football enthusiast. Coach Hey though, was indiscipline and impatient. He and the Liberians party ways immediately, and though the Liberian Football Association asked him to resign, he said no!

The Liberian Football Association immediately turned to the Hungarian tactician Bertalan Bicskei. While Coach Bicskei was keen on building a domestic side strong enough to compete on the international scene, he succumbed to death last year, when suddenly the Italian, Roberto Landi landed the post. He too was fired in February of this year. Coach Landi’s dismissal was apparently based on his poor performances in the 2012 Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers.

The nail was finally put in the coffin when the homegrown Super Eagles of Nigeria trounced the Lone Star in a 2-0 defeat in Monrovia in the presence of the Liberian president, at the Antoinette Tubman Stadium.

Why Liberia needs Coach Moo? Under Coach Moo the Liberian national team should flourish. Liberians styled and called their football ‘tabellah,’ where a strong midfield is prioritized and the ball is shared. Liberians have always experimented with Brazilian football. George Weah is a product. It helps that as a player, coach Huh Jung- Moo was also a midfielder, even when Asian players were rarely plying their trade in Europe, he was one of the few who played there in the 1980s.

Moo’s coaching philosophy also teaches a strong midfield, and the ball is distributed well under that value. His teams dictate the pace of play as far as ball possession is concerned. Having coached his native Korea successfully, the team reached the round of sixteen for the first time away from home during the South Africa 2010 World Cup. Moo would bring nothing but knowledge of the game to the Lone Star.

Liberian players are diminutive in size like their Korea counterparts. Moo used that to his advantage in the 2010 world cup, because what they lack in height and weight, the Koreans make up for in the fitness and intensity. With a lot of Liberian players including its best player in Francis Doe playing in the Asian league, he will have plenty of time to see them first hand in action.

Overlooked: Coach Huh Jung-Moo, on several occasions has been passed over for the coaching position for the Taegeuk Warriors. And when he was finally given the job, coach Moo surprised his detractors when he opted for youth, because there are many within the Korean Football Association who wanted experience and older players.

Similarly, Liberia needs to exploit its youthful generation, which includes Patrick Wleh, Sekou Jabateh and Alex Nimley. It is encouraging that Nimley has decided to play for the Lone Stars; having played on the youth level for England. Moo, sports analysts say would use those talents because he proved that during his last job. It is true, that Liberia’s football glory has faded since the departure of George Weah and company.

That result has seen Liberian football taken a nose dive. Moo could work hard to bridge the gap. Coach Huh Jung-Moo learned under Dutch coaches, especially Guus Hiddink, who today remains a hero in Korea for his exploits while in the employs of the Korean Football Association. It is no secret that South Korea thrived under Dutch coaches especially, Guus Hiddink in particularl. But Moo did win over cynics by leading the team through the qualifying campaign to South Africa with an unbeaten record.

Reports say Moo took temporary charge of South Korea in 1995, overseeing just one game before returning to club management with Chunnam Dragons, where he remained for three years before he was offered the national team job on a full-time basis. Moo’s domestic record was spotty, with his only accomplishment mainly at Chunnam, and that was evident in cup competitions. His record on the league level was considered “ consistently average,” according to football analysts. His work ethics weren’t, but he grew gradually as a coach.

After Guus Hiddink stepped down following his successful run at the 2002 World Cup held in Korean and Japan, the Korean FA appointed a string of foreign coaches, but after snubs from Gerard Houllier and Mick McCarthy, the Korean FA approached Moo, and he accepted. The appointment was not popular with fans and the media considering his previous record, but once the job was offered, he work hard and earned results.

South Africa 2010: The South Korea team went to South Africa optimistic about their chances and Moo was ready for the challenge, even though a lot of doubters thought his appointment was mistaken. Paired in Group B, with Nigeria, Greece and Argentina, it was probably the hardest group in the competition, and nobody gave the South Koreans a chance to qualify in the early group stages, considering that Greece was a former European champion and Nigeria an African powerhouse.

Everyone knew who the Argentinians were: They had Lionel Messi, the world best player, and the legendary Diego Maradona was the man in the dog house! With many predicting Nigeria and Argentina to emerge as group winners, the 59 year old coach and his Taegeuk Warriors took on the Nigerians on June 22 in Durban with an estimated football- crazed crowd of 62, 000 in attendance.

The weather was good! The Taegeuk warriors were agile and confident, they moved the ball fluidly with brisk speed, and frustrated the Super Eagles to a 2-2 draw. First, it was Kalu Uche of the Super Eagles, who tore the net in the 12 minutes. And then, the Koreans fought back wrestling the lead away from them. But Yakubu Aiyegbeni equalized from the penalty spot in the 69th minute. “It’s the first time we are reaching the second round away from home,” Coach Huh Jung-Moo said. “That was our goal. I’m very proud of my players. I feel that my players have played to their full potential.” He broke the heart of Africans.

The Nigerians were suppose to have their best team. It was star-studded, and they had a competent coach in the Swede, Lars Lagerback, who was also probably the highest paid coach in the competition; when you considered the length of his contract. Moo is fluent in English.

Experience: When South Korea beat Greece 2-0 at the biggest football gala under Moo, it was tactical and showed a dominance of strength that was evident in the quick breaks and a neat-passing play that left their “opponents outnumbered at the back,” say an analyst. Also under Moo, South Korea dominated the Asian game, a feat he also showcased inSouth Africa, before falling to Argentina. Even though he accomplished a lot at the world cup, he resigned after the competition as he said he would to make way for fresh ideas.

Moo is also known for grooming players and making them into stars, an accomplishment he could repeat if he lands the important Lone Star position. He picked up some unknown young players and gave them important positions instead of established stars as his critics wanted, inviting harsh condemnations in the process. After a lackluster performance in the 2000 Summer Olympics, and the 1998 Asian Games, the Korean Football Association showed him the door and hired Guus Hiddink.

Also, before him, the Korean Football Association experimented with Humberto Coelho, Jo Bonfrere, Dick Advocaat and Pim Verbeek. Even though they were all of Dutch origins, they failed to impress like Hiddink, prompting Moo’s return. Coach Huh Jung - Moo’s eye for talent however showed result when the much criticized “nameless players” picked by him became stars.

Park Ji-Sung, though demonstrated promise while Moo was still coach earlier on, and blossomed into the most recognized player in Asia in later years. Also notable were Lee Yong - Pyo and Seol Ki - Hyeon. Besides his heroics in South Africa, he also won Asian Football Confederation (AFC) Coach of the Year Award after leading the national team, the Taegeuk Warriors to 27 consecutive games without a loss.

Coach Moo is well placed to lead the Lone Star to greener pastures, because he has been tested and has shown class. The Liberian Football Association must hire this man for the Lone Star job! Coach Moo is the man for the post. The defeat in Calabar was shameful. It is time to rescue the national team under a coach who have worked with little and produce results. Coach Moo is the man!

Ralph Geeplay can be reached at [email protected]

 

Morlu cannot have it both ways

By Serena Golafaley
I cannot not speak with utmost certainty as to which political party will win the U.S. elections, but I can bet my neck that one person who will cheerfully vote on November 6 in the state of Virginia is John S. Morlu.

Wow! I know many Liberians find it fascinating, and I have started to ponder why Morlu will be voting in the U.S. elections while he at the same time continues to partake in Liberia’s national political debates.

Well, Morlu, like some others with deep roots in the U.S. take Liberia to be their distant up-state farm. That is the reason why Morlu uses the U.S. citizenship he acquired in 2003 to not only leverage opportunities in Liberia; but to also experiment with Liberian politics.

In fact, Morlu has never paid taxes in Liberia. Over the four-year period he served as Auditor General, Morly clacked a salary the shape of US$ 15,000 monthly in the first two years, and 22,000 monthly in the second two years. Even with this behemoth income, Morlu did not pay a dime in taxes to Liberia.

On the other hand, he pays high taxes in the U.S. regularly, and on time and dare miss his due date. This coupled with the fact that his wife and four children are American citizens, answers the question why Morlu will be voting on November 6. That’s because he has a stake in the U.S. elections.

But there is another side to the question or concern that has not been addressed; and that’s why Morlu continues to dabble into Liberian national politics and political debates when the same Morlu in 2003 renounced his Liberian citizenship, and sang the Star-Spangled Banner and pledged allegiance to the constitution and flag of the United States.

This question or concern is critical because it raises an important constitutional issue regarding dual citizenship. The Liberian constitution outlaws dual citizenship, therefore no matter how oblivious of the fact Morlu pretends to be he is technically and legally not a citizen of Liberia. And also because he waived his birthright to Liberian citizenship when he chose to become a citizen of the United States in 2003. Morlu holds an American passport. This is a fact he very well knows and will be foolhardy to dispute.

Hence, his furtive mission to brand himself as a ‘likable material for the presidency’ of Liberia in 2017 at the disadvantage of this current Liberian Government and people of Liberia (actual citizens), which he began immediately with his declaration that the government was “three times more corrupt” than its predecessor seems the most likely impetus behind his foray into Liberian politics.

But if political motives are what drive Morlu then Liberians will not hesitate to contact the U.S. State Department or Immigration to have his U.S. citizenship profile published to save their country from this foreign impostor.

The truth of the matter is that Morlu, as a U.S. citizen, tacitly insults the intelligence of Liberians across party lines whenever he feigns uprightness and proffers lectures on corruption, leadership and administrative systems and practices. Because his own records at the GAC on procurement, salary apportionment, human relations, and his dealings with female employees, etc., are unenviable, and shows the extent to which he lacks probity.

Morlu’s dubious records on corruption at the GAC, and his refusal to audit the Liberian legislature when he headed the GAC, should provoke more questions and concerns among Liberians when they reflect on the diminutive bow-tie wearing man.

A look at Morlu never stops to negatively fascinate people. As a way of maximizing the opportunities of his American citizenship when it was clear to Morlu that he would not retain his job as Auditor General, he began to impress on his fellow American, former U.S. Ambassador to Liberia, Linda Thomas Greenfield, to help fetch out a job for him at the UN.

Ambassador Greenfield, being generous influenced a U.S. recommendation for Morlu for the post of Head of Internal Oversight Services, since the US has a quota at the UN. Nonetheless, the UN, as well as some in the U.S. government raised questions over whether Morlu had the administrative knowledge and experience to lead that huge and intricate agency.

After the loud talk of over qualification and international marketability, many Liberians are wondering whether the diminutive bow-tie wearing man currently works in the U.S., and wants to know what he is actually doing.

[email protected]

Liberia needs a Library Board

By Nathan N. Mulbah

It is often said that food and exercise is to the body what reading is to the mind. A widely read individual is certainly a prepared figure ready to meet the challenges of life head-on. The concept of reading substantively is introduced to all students at an early stage in their academic sojourn. Literacy and numeracy are twin virtues that must be encoraged at all time by all right-thinking and well-meaning individuals keen on developing the human community.

Sadly, many of educational institutions, ranging from, nursery, primary and secondary to tertiary, do not have the necessary intellectual garages (libraries and laboratories) with the requisite materials and books that will help to broaden the horizon and sharpen the intelligent quotient of many sons and daughters of Liberia.

Even universities here do not have first- rate standardized libraries and laboratories. This lack of libraries and laboratories, has to a large extent, affected the development of the full potential of students and robbed them of the opportunities to be able to compete with their counterparts from other countries.

Towards this end, this article seeks to highlight the necessity and compelling need for the establishment of a National Library Board that will superintend the construction and maintenance libraries throughout the country. Reading is an essential component in the intellectual and human resource development of any nation from time in memorial. It was Dr. Seuss who said: “the more that you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn the more places you will go.”

Hence, the need for well-equipped libraries at all schools and universities as well as every big towns and cities cannot be overemphasized. There must also be serious attempts at establishing libraries in all ministries and agencies of government at both national and provincial levels. To accomplish this fate, there is a need for the establishment of a substantive National Library Board that will essentially evolve programs which will ensure that libraries are constructed throughout the length and breadth of Liberia.

The conspicuous lack of these intellectual growth facilities across the country is an embarrassment to true academicians as it is to conscious Liberian society. The problem is colossal but yet surmountable if the right mechanism are put in vogue.

The Problem
A cursory inspection of schools and universities operating in the country will reveal the lacked of libraries and laboratories. As a matter of fact, we do not have a National Library even in Monrovia least to talk about libraries in the provincial capitals of our political sub-divisions.

The so-called libraries in our primary and secondary institutions are nothing to write home about. Most of what is paraded as libraries often passed as mere under-equipped reading room. Worst still, libraries at our tertiary institutions are not up to the task and do not, in most instances, represent a university library any way.

Moreover, besides the central university library, there are no departmental libraries. There is something about departmental library that we have not come to grasp in this country. A good departmental library has on shelve the relevant course books and materials that have got all the trappings of making students and researchers deeply conversant with the subject they are studying back to back.

It is an open secret that even where only central library exist, the materials on the shelve are, in most instances, archaic and outdated. Periodicals and encyclopedia are as well dust laden and reminiscent of 16th Century academic material. Most of the books found in those libraries cannot help the student specific needs. There are just not great books that one can leaf through and be real satisfied. It is an established fact that good books instill in students the love to read. And love for reading begins with books and ends with it. But we must cultivate the culture of reading by ensuring that we construct state own national libraries and one in every big towns and cities across Liberia.

In fact, in this 21st Century where information technology has become a catch phrase with on-line libraries, tweeting, face book utilization and general cyber and internet appreciation becoming cardinal to academic pursuit the world over.
Towards this end, I cannot agree the more with Darren Wilkins writing in the Daily Observer Science and Technology column, when he called on lawmakers to use some of their “HUGE” benefits and allotments to build Library Media Center in their Electoral Districts.

But if I can push it further, Yours Truly will posit that, we need to establish a National Library Board.

Admittedly though, there is a slow spiraling of private community libraries in some communities across the country. This is certainly a laudable venture, but capacity, materials and funding remain serious challenges. But we are certain that with the creation of a National Library Board, we can make significant inroad in building a huge human resource pool across the country.

Configuration of National Library Board
It pains me to hear every now and then Liberians making reference to development unfolding in other countries especially Ghana but failed to learn from those experiences. But for good reason we need to keep making reference to the Ghanaian experience. In Ghana for example, there is a National Library Board. That board is responsible essentially to establish libraries across that country and develop the mode of operation and maintenance.

After the configuration of the National Library Board, the board will firstly ensure establishment of a National Library in Monrovia and promote the culture of reading amongst students, scholars, and the public and then move on to the leeward counties. Remember, favorite reads organized in one place is an impetus to intellectual advancement.

When former American President George W. Bush visited Liberia in 2008, he consciously gave us US1 Million dollar worth of books. If we had national libraries around the country, we would have safely distributed said reading materials with ease.
The gift by Mr. Bush, in my mind, was intended to make us take reading seriously. It is good to talk at Haitayee shops and palava huts at the various universities but reading rigorously for long hours will certainly enrich our intellectuality. So let’s get reading folks.

We must encourage our students and the public to develop the culture of reading. For reading is to the mind what eating and exercise is to the body. In other to eloquently dialect on issues in a more responsible and appreciable manner we must read. Our intellectual landscape is now bubbling with many half way people and quacks who relied heavily on hearsay instead of reading but choose to present themselves as fine intellectual species.

Arguably folks, the establishment of a National Library Board is a national priority that must be taken seriously and put on our development agenda come what may. Sadly, this year’s fiscal budget does not address the issue of libraries construction in any community. May we reflect on this suggestion and see the need to establish a National Library Board.

[email protected]

Liberia: Negro Clause Is Not Racist; It Is Protectionary

By Robtel Neajai Pailey

There is a subculture in Liberia that, though highly visible and active, is almost never discussed – like an unacknowledged elephant in the room.

It consists of Lebanese businessmen and their families who started migrating to West Africa in the 1950s and found a home in Liberia. It consists of thin, lanky young men and women who manage all the major stores on Randall Street, Camp Johnson Road, Somalia Drive, and the Vai Town-Clara Town-Logan Town corridor.

It consists of dark-haired and olive-skinned children who look visibly different from the average Liberian child, yet possess our slippery tongues and slurring words.

Some were born in Liberia while others flocked to the ‘land of liberty’ looking for milk and honey. While some are content to remain insulated in “Little Lebanon” in Liberia, others have assimilated, struggling hard to carve out their own form of ‘Liberianness.’

But under our Constitution, they cannot own land. Under our Constitution, they cannot vote in national or sub-national elections. Under our Constitution, they cannot carry Liberian passports. According to the Negro clause in our Aliens and Nationality Law–which states that only people of black African descent can be citizens—Lebanese nationals are not eligible to be citizens of Liberia.
And neither should they be.

I recently read an op-ed in the Huffington Post by Rima Merhi, a Lebanese national who grew up in Liberia. She balks at what she considers to be Liberia’s ‘constitutional racism,’ arguing that as “America’s face in Africa,” Liberia should have more inclusive nationality laws.

What Merhi fails to realize is that context matters.

Liberia’s Negro clause is not racist; it is protectionary. The Negro clause was instituted at a time when Liberia was trying to protect itself from foreign domination. But the threat to national sovereignty did not disappear just because the 19th century “Scramble for Africa” by European powers ended in the 20th.

The Negro clause may be discriminatory, but it is not racist. Besides, most nationality laws throughout the world are discriminatory, clearly separating those who belong from those who must fight to belong. Just ask Mexicans who die trying to jump over fences the height of Mt. Nimba on a daily basis crossing into the United States. Or Sub-Saharan Africans who risk their lives sailing in makeshift boats to Europe and are denied entry. Or the Roma in Turkey who are not citizens in the land of their birth.

Nationality laws are the only means by which countries can assert their power in the 21st century. Liberia is no different.
Therefore, our Aliens and Nationality Law cannot be considered racist in context.

Racism is about withholding power based solely on race. But most non-black, non-African nationals in Liberia are far more powerful than the vast majority of our 3.4 million native Liberian population. One only has to peak in the doors of our major concession negotiations, our policy meetings at the highest level, or our posh restaurants/bars/clubs/entertainment centers to see who actually wields political, economic, and social power.

At the moment, the Negro clause is the only way of protecting the vast majority of Liberians from oblivion, especially since the civil war left them with virtually nothing, except their citizenship. By maintaining and enforcing our current nationality laws—and warding off foreigners—native Liberians stand a better chance at achieving political reforms, economic prosperity, and social cohesion on their own terms.

Most great nations go through a period of internal awakening, when they define what it means to be a unified whole. Before Ghana expanded its nationality laws to grant citizenship to non-Ghanaians in 2002, it went through a long period of nationalism. Liberia has yet to shut the outside world out. It is now time to look “inward,” beginning with the process of clearly defining what is required of Liberian citizens under our current Constitution.

We must first tighten our nationality laws and ensure compliance. We cannot begin to think about amending the Negro clause until this process is complete. Granted, the Negro clause also affects the countless numbers of Indians, Chinese, Europeans, and North Americans of non-African descent whose case for citizenship is no different from the Lebanese. The Negro clause is especially controversial now in the age of rapid globalization, but we should not discard it just because we want to bow down to pressure from what is increasingly becoming a borderless world for some and not others.

In my Ph.D. research on the current and historical factors that have led to the introduction of dual citizenship legislation in Liberia, I have come across many arguments for why people should hold multiple citizenships. But I remain on the fence. No argument has convinced me that holding multiple citizenships brings a person closer to his/her nation. I’m not convinced that removing the Negro clause will bring non-black, non-African nationals in Liberia any closer to fulfilling obligations as active citizens.

Citizenship is not some cosmetic exercise. You don’t put it on when it’s convenient, and wipe it off when it’s not. For me, citizenship is about participating in the political, economic, and social development of a nation. It is an activity and not a state of being. Citizenship is not only about demanding privileges and rights. It is about asking what you can do for your country. And doing it.

Some Liberians argue that the Negro clause is outdated, that we need to gradually move into the 21st century. I’m not convinced we are ready to relinquish the Negro clause yet, even if we say we are. We still need to figure out what ‘Liberian citizenship’ truly means, and practice it in both words and deeds.

If we are accused unjustifiably of racism until then, so be it.

* ** [email protected]*

Drugs dehumanize and enslave human beings

By Clemente Ferrer

The Foundation Against Drug Addiction has launched an ad campaign, inter alia, under the following slogan: “Drugs do not only damage those who consume them”. “Everything has a price”. This campaign aims to raise awareness about the sinister presence of drugs within society. This creative initiative rests upon the idea that the most dangerous aspect of drugs is actually forgetting about what they really are.

Worldwide, the propensity of new AIDS infections has been reduced by 17 percent, due to the 15 percent regression of Sub Saharan Africa. About 77,000 people have died due to the AIDS virus, not to mention that about 7,000 children have been infected with the virus.

The remaining group where the virus continues to thrive is among sex professionals and drug consumers. It is estimated that about 29 percent of the 2 million Hispano Americans that consume injectable drugs is infected with the virus.

AIDS is a social disease that has a lot to do with groups of people who do not respect ethics, and tend to live rampantly. AIDS emerges as a warning, a warning to those who trespass an invisible barrier and lose humanity.

The good news is that the effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment in Latin America is higher than the global average, which is 54% of those afflicted. However, although the risk groups are identifiable, few prevention programs aim to target them directly.

Drugs are hustled around within marginal environments of misfortune and poverty. There are more than one thousand huts that house those clans who vegetate in brittle situations.

In the suburbs of refugees, few are those who reach the fourth decade of existence. There are more than 2,000 clandestine huts and more or less 40,000 mortals of distinct nations. The weakness and fragility of these constructions, the lack of clean and safe water and lighting, as well as the meagerness of health conditions, in addition to the evident depauperation, are the routinely lived surroundings. It astonishes when one sees content, ragged and naked creatures being indifferent about their cruel reality and frolicking between the stocks of garbage piles.

The spectacle is so shocking that it makes one’s heart shudder. A separate humanity is what appears upon its worn out dwellings, who have resigned the battle for their comfort and well being. With the stigma that drugs provoke, i.e. a hollow firmness, hardly without even maintaining such firmness, addicts creep about to prepare used up needles. Doesn’t the emptiness of God lead to hopelessness? Hopelessness leads to dehumanization. The human being without God dehumanizes and becomes the enemy of his or her own self. (Translated by Gianna A. Sanchez Moretti).

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of publicity and press relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

[email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Madcap Malema goes to Zimbabwe

By Ralph Geeplay

Julius Malema, the madcap South African politician who is always in the news was in Zimbabwe this week, preaching the pro poor rhetoric and racial politics that saw him ostracized from the ruling African National Congress this year. Malema was in Harare to attend the wedding of the Zanu-pf Youth League president.

In Malema’s delegation was the ANC Secretary General Sindiso Magaqa, who was also suspended recently. Malema has been mad with the ANC for quite a while since his expulsion, with the current nationwide strikes in the country providing an opportunity as unhappy South Africans see their living standards decline since the ANC came to power. Reports say, he is exploiting the situation to his advantage.

Malema was expelled from the African National Congress this year after a long spell of bad mouthing President Jacob Zuma and the ANC. By ousting the former African National Congress Youth League President, the ANC took a tough action that took months given Malema’s so-called proletariat statues within the party. Julius Malema wants South African mines nationalized; he also wants land taken away forcibly from white South Africans; he accused whites of murdering blacks when they acquired the assets.

Malema somewhat, has been described as the kingmaker within the party, given that he helped bring president Zuma to power in a political battled that saw former President Tambo Mbeki exiting the stage. By also getting rid of Malema, President Zuma is said to have engineered the exit of his chief political rival, as the party meets soon to elect the eventual candidate which it hope to put forward for the next election, but analyst say, Malema was not willing to go quietly.

He has found discontent within the country’s labor force, which began when platinum behemoth Lonmin’s Marikana saw strikes with workers calling for pay increase. It was a scene that also witnessed violence in August; post apartheid, it is the worst government crackdown on demonstrators. In all 46 were killed, strikers and the police. The incident is now being investigated by a government-appointed commission of inquiry.

Concerned that Malema was using the strikers’ discontent to ferment trouble in a South Africa where economic activity was already slowing, and where the protests are costing the ANC-led government hundreds of millions, he was arrested while on a speaking engagement with the strikers.

He was subsequently charged with tax evasion and money laundering. The charges, says the former ANCYL president and his business partners, put forward an intricate sham of businesses to gain an infrastructure contract in Limpopo, worth about $6.3million. Malema has denied the charges.

But a political science professor at the University of Liberia says it is “unlikely if Malema would have been charged with corruption charges if he was still heading the ANCYL.

Because, the political black elite in South Africa having groomed power, some say are leaving the people behind especially when it comes to service delivery, and that few black elites under the so-called Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) ‘affirmative action’ program initiated by President Mbeki are getting richer; Malema was one of them.” Because of these perceived reactions, the Democratic Alliance which is presenting another alternative for leadership has been growing in strength with Helen Zille as its head.

In Zimbabwe, Malema praised President Robert Mugabe and compared him to Nelson Mandela. “President Mandela [and Mugabe] ushered in political freedom . . .” the firebrand politician said, “and they are relying on the young ones to continue with the struggle, therefore, we are not going to disappoint them,” he added.

Reports say there are about 40 political prisoners in Zimbabwean jails, and that President Mugabe and his Zanu-pf has used political violence to silent dissent.

Before going to Zimbabwe, Malema also called for the land and the mines to be taken from white South Africans compulsorily, whom he says stole the resources from the black majority, when they came from Europe; he said they met the land there. Like Mugabe, Malema is also blaming the imperialists. “Our life has been made problematic by the imperialistic forces and therefore we are always in serious conflict with them because they have created conflict,”

While Malema was praising the progress that Zimbabwe has made under President Mugabe, another African was telling a different story. Mo Ibrahim said Zimbabwe marred in political quirk mire was underperforming, when it ought to be an African powerhouse. This year annual recently released Ibrahim index on Africa puts Zimbabwe at 47th out of 52 African countries, with a score of 34 out of 100. That made Zimbabwe the worst-performing country in South Africa where most countries are doing fairly well.

Ibrahim also said, post independent “African leaders came from freedom-fighting, liberation movements” and then added, “A good fighter is not necessarily a good governor. It takes different skills to run a country.”

Ralph Geeplay can be reached at [email protected]

 

Q&A with Liberian-born Attorney A. Teage Jalloh

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

Q & A with Liberian-born Attorney A. Teage Jalloh, on his historic role regarding a lawsuit he plans to file, or has already filed in the Liberian Supreme Court against the Ellen Johnson Sirleaf administration. Most Liberians believe the lawsuit is essentially about the government’s refusal to grant dual citizenship to Diaspora Liberians, who wants to vote in their birth country’s elections, do legitimate business there, and contribute to its development. The Supreme Court of Liberia heard the first oral argument in this case on April 11, 2011.

T.W. Sungbeh: Liberian chat rooms are abuzz about what those Liberians believe is a lawsuit you already filed or plan to file against the Liberian government’s refusal to grant dual citizenship to Liberians in the Diaspora. What’s your take on this issue?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: 1) The lawsuit is not about dual citizenship. Rather, the lawsuit questions section 22.1 and 22.2 of the Aliens and Nationality Act, which purports to automatically deprive a person of his or her Liberian citizenship and land, which violates the due process clause and other provisions of the 1986 Constitution. 2) Article 20 (a) of the Liberian Constitution grants every person the right to a hearing consistent with due process of law. 3) The government may decide not to recognize dual citizenship, but our Constitution requires the government to respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person, such as the constitutional right to due process, before it may deprive that person of his or her Liberian citizenship.

T.W. Sungbeh: Have you gotten any support in terms of funds and moral support from individual Liberians, the greater umbrella organization such as the Union of Liberian Associations in the Americas (ULAA), that represents the interests of Liberians in the United States, and are you also getting any support from county organizations in your state or any other state in the United States, to help with this lawsuit?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: No. I have not gotten any kind of support from a county association so far. There are individual Liberians who are aware of this lawsuit and what it stands to achieve. Even though ULAA has it internal problem, but the administration of Anthony Kessely was helpful in providing moral support and other support to the lawsuit.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: The Gaye Sleh administration has also provided us moral support but not financial support, even though his administration could do more.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh You know my brother, I am just one person. It is kind of difficult. It would help a lot if I had some support. Those who are aware of the lawsuit know what this lawsuit is all about. I have so far discussed this with some of our Diaspora leaders, but there is fear. Some of our Diaspora leaders who know that I know they are in fact citizens of the United States; they don’t want to tell people.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Some of them are not sure that if they come out in support of this people will know that they are citizens of the United States or another country. I have shared some important legal documents concerning the lawsuit with some of these Diaspora leaders. They know what’s taken place. To the extent that people want to help it will be welcomed. But from a personal perspective, I will go forward with the lawsuit because it’s already filed.

T.W. Sungbeh: As you know, there are two feuding ULAA factions. One run by Gaye Sleh, and the other headed by Mariah Seton. Have you gotten any support from the Mariah Seton’s ULAA faction?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I have gotten only moral support from that ULAA.

T.W. Sungbeh: Filing a lawsuit is not so easy; you need money. You being a lawyer ought to know it. So if ULAA is not embracing this lawsuit wholeheartedly with financial support, are you in touch with other Liberian organizations around the country to draw up support?

Attorney A Teage Jalloh: I come to this thing strictly with a legal mind. I have spoken with individual Liberians and those on the Internet, and have also spoken with the Federation of Liberians in Europe. They have given me moral support so far. If the court rules this law is unconstitutional than it will be a different ball game. People so far have generally given moral support. There are individual Liberians that have volunteered to raise funds on their own. Me being a direct participant and a lawyer, I really don’t get involve into that; because so far I have paid for everything on my own.

T.W. Sungbeh: Do you think the reason why they government is dragging its feet on this issue is political than legal?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I honestly do not think any sensible lawyer will argue that this law doesn’t violate due process. All of the law students in Liberia, if they don’t remember nothing else during their first year of law school will tell you about the case of Wolo v. Wolo. Some of them can even cite the 1936 case in their sleep. The Liberian Supreme Court pretty much said that the law was hear before it condemn. Even if you leave out the constitutional aspect, the law is a violation of the Wolo v. Wolo case. Unfortunately, our government hasn’t spoken with more clarity of thisautomatic loss of citizenship issue. It might be because of political reasons.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Let me just put it this way. The President has an obligation to defend an Act of Legislature if there is plausible reason to doing so. The president is the Chief Executive Officer, even though the Ministry of Justice is arguing the case on behalf of the government. But they pretty much argued the president’s position.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: President Sirleaf has the constitutional prerogative to speak on this issue. Even if the president believe the law is unconstitutional, she can only exercise her constitutional authority not to enforce the law, but the citizens who are affected by the law can challenge the law in a court based on our system of government.

T.W. Sungbeh: How did you get involve with this case?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Thank you for asking me that question. I had the opportunity to go to Liberia to visit. I didn’t have the power myself, but I think at some point in life we are all driven by certain forces in life. We have a saying in West Africa, “It takes a village to raise a child.” The reciprocal obligation is when that child grows up is to take care of the village. Based on my legal training, I know that the law is unconstitutional, and if there is a way that I can help out, than I should.

T.W. Sungbeh: What do you intend to achieve from this lawsuit, and personally, what do you expect to get out of it?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: This lawsuit is one of the biggest constitutional questions of our time. Apart from the humantarian, people were also forced out of the country at gunpoint. Can you take away a right from a person, a fundamental right, a right to citizenship no matter what you think about that person. Can you deprive that person of their right without any kind of administrative or judicial hearing? If the answer to that question is not only a violation of the constitution, but will set a dangerous precedent for our democracy. We cannot give up on Liberia. That’s where the (nabor strings) umbilical cords are buried. If this law is not successfully challenged, it will mean that we are no longer Liberians.

T.W. Sungbeh: As you already know the Liberian legal system is not independent, and is often fraught with corruption and political interference from the highest level of the political chain. Do you think you lawsuit will get a fair hearing under such conditions?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: That’s a very good question, and I believe the hearing will be fair. But the issues involved are not nust about me. That’s why I’ve tried during the past months to let Liberians know about their constitutional rights. Let them know about the lawsuit. Because the more people know and become informed about their constitutional rights, perhaps, the executive branch will take notice that people are more aware of their rights that they will not accept an automatic loss of citizenship. If people are aware of their rights, they will ask the right questions when some of our political leaders come over here to hold these town hall meetings, when people start asking them about these questions, let them know that they know their right, it will be better for us. Initially, people thought this lawsuit was just about (me) some boy from Bopolu, just one person. The more people start knowing about this lawsuit and what it entails, people will get the message. It is not about me.

T.W. Sungbeh: Is there a legal precedent for a lawsuit of this kind that was filed by a Liberian-born lawyer living out of Liberia against the Liberian government?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: No. I am not aware of it. There is a case we called “First Impression.” This is the first time we have talked about the issue of automatic loss of citizenship, so this is a delicate issue. People have to take their time. But you know what? This is not the first time we have talked about due process. The most famous case in Liberia about due process was 76 years ago, in 1937. In 1984 when the framers of our 1986 constitution sat together, they like that Wolo v. Wolo decision so much that they inserted it under article 20 (a) of the constitution.

T.W. Sungbeh: You mentioned before the interview started that you are working with a lawyer in Liberia to help you with this case. What’s his name?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I am the plaintiff in the case and the main petitioner. And my Counselor of Records is Jerome Korkoya, Esq. He’s one of the best legal minds that we have. He understands the issues.

T.W. Sungbeh: Is there a time set to go to court?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Under the Liberian rules, the court did entertained oral argument before. But the court did not render a decision when they heard oral argument in 2011. We’ll petition the Clerk of the Supreme Court for an assignment for oral argument in the coming weeks, and if the court accepts, we could argue within the next month or so. And if a decision is rendered, it probably will be around December or January of next year.

T.W. Sungbeh: Thank you for your time, Attorney Jalloh.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: You are welcome.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh can be reached at 267-934-6603

 

Q&A with Liberian-born Attorney A. Teage Jalloh

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

Q & A with Liberian-born Attorney A. Teage Jalloh, on his historic role regarding a lawsuit he plans to file, or has already filed in the Liberian Supreme Court against the Ellen Johnson Sirleaf administration. Most Liberians believe the lawsuit is essentially about the government’s refusal to grant dual citizenship to Diaspora Liberians, who wants to vote in their birth country’s elections, do legitimate business there, and contribute to its development. The Supreme Court of Liberia heard the first oral argument in this case on April 11, 2011.

T.W. Sungbeh: Liberian chat rooms are abuzz about what those Liberians believe is a lawsuit you already filed or plan to file against the Liberian government’s refusal to grant dual citizenship to Liberians in the Diaspora. What’s your take on this issue?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: 1) The lawsuit is not about dual citizenship. Rather, the lawsuit questions section 22.1 and 22.2 of the Aliens and Nationality Act, which purports to automatically deprive a person of his or her Liberian citizenship and land, which violates the due process clause and other provisions of the 1986 Constitution. 2) Article 20 (a) of the Liberian Constitution grants every person the right to a hearing consistent with due process of law. 3) The government may decide not to recognize dual citizenship, but our Constitution requires the government to respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person, such as the constitutional right to due process, before it may deprive that person of his or her Liberian citizenship.

T.W. Sungbeh: Have you gotten any support in terms of funds and moral support from individual Liberians, the greater umbrella organization such as the Union of Liberian Associations in the Americas (ULAA), that represents the interests of Liberians in the United States, and are you also getting any support from county organizations in your state or any other state in the United States, to help with this lawsuit?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: No. I have not gotten any kind of support from a county association so far. There are individual Liberians who are aware of this lawsuit and what it stands to achieve. Even though ULAA has it internal problem, but the administration of Anthony Kessely was helpful in providing moral support and other support to the lawsuit.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: The Gaye Sleh administration has also provided us moral support but not financial support, even though his administration could do more.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh You know my brother, I am just one person. It is kind of difficult. It would help a lot if I had some support. Those who are aware of the lawsuit know what this lawsuit is all about. I have so far discussed this with some of our Diaspora leaders, but there is fear. Some of our Diaspora leaders who know that I know they are in fact citizens of the United States; they don’t want to tell people.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Some of them are not sure that if they come out in support of this people will know that they are citizens of the United States or another country. I have shared some important legal documents concerning the lawsuit with some of these Diaspora leaders. They know what’s taken place. To the extent that people want to help it will be welcomed. But from a personal perspective, I will go forward with the lawsuit because it’s already filed.

T.W. Sungbeh: As you know, there are two feuding ULAA factions. One run by Gaye Sleh, and the other headed by Mariah Seton. Have you gotten any support from the Mariah Seton’s ULAA faction?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I have gotten only moral support from that ULAA.

T.W. Sungbeh: Filing a lawsuit is not so easy; you need money. You being a lawyer ought to know it. So if ULAA is not embracing this lawsuit wholeheartedly with financial support, are you in touch with other Liberian organizations around the country to draw up support?

Attorney A Teage Jalloh: I come to this thing strictly with a legal mind. I have spoken with individual Liberians and those on the Internet, and have also spoken with the Federation of Liberians in Europe. They have given me moral support so far. If the court rules this law is unconstitutional than it will be a different ball game. People so far have generally given moral support. There are individual Liberians that have volunteered to raise funds on their own. Me being a direct participant and a lawyer, I really don’t get involve into that; because so far I have paid for everything on my own.

T.W. Sungbeh: Do you think the reason why they government is dragging its feet on this issue is political than legal?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I honestly do not think any sensible lawyer will argue that this law doesn’t violate due process. All of the law students in Liberia, if they don’t remember nothing else during their first year of law school will tell you about the case of Wolo v. Wolo. Some of them can even cite the 1936 case in their sleep. The Liberian Supreme Court pretty much said that the law was hear before it condemn. Even if you leave out the constitutional aspect, the law is a violation of the Wolo v. Wolo case. Unfortunately, our government hasn’t spoken with more clarity of thisautomatic loss of citizenship issue. It might be because of political reasons.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Let me just put it this way. The President has an obligation to defend an Act of Legislature if there is plausible reason to doing so. The president is the Chief Executive Officer, even though the Ministry of Justice is arguing the case on behalf of the government. But they pretty much argued the president’s position.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: President Sirleaf has the constitutional prerogative to speak on this issue. Even if the president believe the law is unconstitutional, she can only exercise her constitutional authority not to enforce the law, but the citizens who are affected by the law can challenge the law in a court based on our system of government.

T.W. Sungbeh: How did you get involve with this case?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Thank you for asking me that question. I had the opportunity to go to Liberia to visit. I didn’t have the power myself, but I think at some point in life we are all driven by certain forces in life. We have a saying in West Africa, “It takes a village to raise a child.” The reciprocal obligation is when that child grows up is to take care of the village. Based on my legal training, I know that the law is unconstitutional, and if there is a way that I can help out, than I should.

T.W. Sungbeh: What do you intend to achieve from this lawsuit, and personally, what do you expect to get out of it?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: This lawsuit is one of the biggest constitutional questions of our time. Apart from the humantarian, people were also forced out of the country at gunpoint. Can you take away a right from a person, a fundamental right, a right to citizenship no matter what you think about that person. Can you deprive that person of their right without any kind of administrative or judicial hearing? If the answer to that question is not only a violation of the constitution, but will set a dangerous precedent for our democracy. We cannot give up on Liberia. That’s where the (nabor strings) umbilical cords are buried. If this law is not successfully challenged, it will mean that we are no longer Liberians.

T.W. Sungbeh: As you already know the Liberian legal system is not independent, and is often fraught with corruption and political interference from the highest level of the political chain. Do you think you lawsuit will get a fair hearing under such conditions?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: That’s a very good question, and I believe the hearing will be fair. But the issues involved are not nust about me. That’s why I’ve tried during the past months to let Liberians know about their constitutional rights. Let them know about the lawsuit. Because the more people know and become informed about their constitutional rights, perhaps, the executive branch will take notice that people are more aware of their rights that they will not accept an automatic loss of citizenship. If people are aware of their rights, they will ask the right questions when some of our political leaders come over here to hold these town hall meetings, when people start asking them about these questions, let them know that they know their right, it will be better for us. Initially, people thought this lawsuit was just about (me) some boy from Bopolu, just one person. The more people start knowing about this lawsuit and what it entails, people will get the message. It is not about me.

T.W. Sungbeh: Is there a legal precedent for a lawsuit of this kind that was filed by a Liberian-born lawyer living out of Liberia against the Liberian government?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: No. I am not aware of it. There is a case we called “First Impression.” This is the first time we have talked about the issue of automatic loss of citizenship, so this is a delicate issue. People have to take their time. But you know what? This is not the first time we have talked about due process. The most famous case in Liberia about due process was 76 years ago, in 1937. In 1984 when the framers of our 1986 constitution sat together, they like that Wolo v. Wolo decision so much that they inserted it under article 20 (a) of the constitution.

T.W. Sungbeh: You mentioned before the interview started that you are working with a lawyer in Liberia to help you with this case. What’s his name?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: I am the plaintiff in the case and the main petitioner. And my Counselor of Records is Jerome Korkoya, Esq. He’s one of the best legal minds that we have. He understands the issues.

T.W. Sungbeh: Is there a time set to go to court?

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: Under the Liberian rules, the court did entertained oral argument before. But the court did not render a decision when they heard oral argument in 2011. We’ll petition the Clerk of the Supreme Court for an assignment for oral argument in the coming weeks, and if the court accepts, we could argue within the next month or so. And if a decision is rendered, it probably will be around December or January of next year.

T.W. Sungbeh: Thank you for your time, Attorney Jalloh.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh: You are welcome.

Attorney A. Teage Jalloh can be reached at 267-934-6603