Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for September, 2013

Uruguay decriminalized cannabis contrary to international treaties

By Clemente Ferrer Uruguay decriminalized cannabis

The United Nations body in charge of inspecting compliance with the international drug treaties expressed “concern” regarding the approval of the Chamber of Deputies of Uruguay on a law legalizing the production and distribution of cannabis. The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) said that if this bill is passed, it would be against the provisions of international treaties on narcotic drugs.

The INCB urged the Uruguayan authorities to ensure that the country continues obeying international law to restrict the use of drugs, including cannabis dedicated exclusively to medical and scientific purposes.

This law could bring “serious consequences for the health and welfare of the population and on the prevention of abuse of cannabis among young people.” Therefore, the INCB requested the authorities to consider “all the consequences before taking a decision.”

This bill authorizes the cultivation, distribution and sale of marijuana under state regulation. To enter into force, the law must be approved by the Senate. Uruguay’s government claims that marijuana legalization is a way to fight against drug trafficking more effective than repression, as it fights its funding sources..

Moreover, in Spain the Foundation Against Drug Addiction (FAD) has launched a new advertising campaign under the slogan: ‘Not always is one so lucky. Do not play with drugs‘.

The action is aimed at young people between 15 and 24, to prevent the risks of drug abuse. Mindful that young people use every day more social networks, the FAD has therefore opened a new Facebook page that includes all ad campaigns that have taken place since the founding of the Foundation.

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

[email protected]

 

In defense of MOLAC & CLACI

By Siahyonkron Nyanseor Siahyonkron J.K. Nyanseor

Senior Advisor, MOLAC & CLACI

 

Ladies and gentlemen: I need not remind to you that our country Liberia is in leadership crisis. Liberia is in ethical morass and a state of organized BRAZEN plunder. And yes, our country is once more crying for us to expose those who use Liberia as their personal bank accounts, and their plantation to enrich themselves and their cronies at the expense of the Liberian people.

If anybody thinks the Liberian people are fools, than that person is ignorant of history. How can the Liberian people miss individuals who just yesterday were dirt poor, and out of a sudden are earning anywhere from $10 to $15,000.00 a month doing nothing but riding around in brand new cars with traveling allowances that can pay the yearly salaries of fifty persons in Liberia. How can the Liberian people miss individuals who yesterday rode “Holy, Holy” (public transportation) with many of us? Because of their new status, they acquired new-bad attitude; talk down to people as if they are their house boys and girls - with no consideration that the Liberian people deserve respect. How can the people forget such abuse that is done to them with impunity? How can they?

Based on the profound words of President Andrew Jackson, “One man with courage makes a majority.” This statement is true today as it was in his time!

One does not have to be nuclear scientist to know corrupt practices when they see it.

J. Kerkula Foeday is right to say, “Like Taylor, Ellen is today using our resources to smokescreen bad governance practices, including corruption in Liberia. We know this. So we are not surprised by the plan to use their privileged positions and ill-gotten wealth to mobilize their cronies and blind supporters to protest for corruption in Liberia.” He also said:

“So Emmett, save your money. No need for betting with anyone. It will augur well for you if you can donate the $100 to MOLAC so that we can buy and print more placards with anti-corruption messages.”

In a country where there are many poor and hungry people, money can do a lot; buy them for a while, use their own resources, which includes wealth earned from both their human and natural resources to make them feel good. History tells us that this approach is only temporarily.

Remember the phrase: “You can fool some of the people some of the time, and not all the people all of the time.” Liberians too, say: “Ninety years are not forever!”

To which C. Washington Tarpeh made an excellent observation:

“This game of yours has no absolute value/outcome. Therefore, a bet on such a game is problem prone. For example, an individual or a group of individuals may demonstrate to express their discontentment about an issue of social importance, and such discontentment may be relatively limited to this particular individual or the group of individuals. While corruption is rampant in Liberia, there are others who think the corruption in Liberia is not at a level to warrant a public demonstration. Therefore, despite the hundreds of thousands of Liberians in the US, only a small fraction of this number considers the issue of corruption fundamentally serious. Hence, the actual number of demonstrators may be less or more than 50. That said, what is important is the issue that precipitates the demonstration and NOT the actual number of demonstrators.”

On the other hand, one may have had the incentive to place a bet if the game were framed as follows: Of the hundreds of thousands of Liberians in the US, only a Zero number of Liberians will show up for the MOLAC’s planned demonstration. This game has an absolute value or a definite outcome, either nobody (0) shows up or somebody (1) shows up.

Thus, those who doubt the power of the people better watch out; history is about to be repeated. It takes “small axe to cut big tree down.” Those who do not believe in this adage should go on making fun of those of us who are dead serious of doing something about CORRUPTION in our country. They can go on betting that no more than 50 persons will attend the peace and lawful protest in New York. You watch out! Many are called, but few are chosen. If only two persons attend the peaceful protest organized by the Movement of Liberians Against Corruption (MOLAC) and the Concerned Liberians Against Corruption and Impunity (CLACI), they would have achieved their objectives. It would have achieved with personal sacrifices and funds obtained legally, and not STOLEN.

I will not be surprised if the Ellen regime mobilizes tugs and “who want work” (individuals looking for work in Liberian parlance) to show support for her corrupt government. They will be welcomed with the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, “Father forgive them for they know not what they do;” (Luke 23:34) then take their pictures to have it posted on the new website that is being developed and have them stored for the reading public to view — as individuals or groups that assists Ellen and her associates to rip the Liberian people off.

MOLAC and CLACI are following the wise saying of Confucius that reads: “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” To add to it, when you start counting, do you start from 2, 3 or 50? In the math taught me in the 50’s at Government Morning School, South Beach, you start from the NUMBER 1. That tells us that the number 1 is as important as 50 or 500. Since this is the case, if one person showed up at the UN to tell the world about the CORRUPTION in Liberia, we will be happy.

Dr. Zumo said it right:

…Every age has been one where people were afraid to speak up. This age has been one where people speak up commonly, but are afraid to offend where offense is needed. One person stepping forward to show the others what is necessary is a leader in the making. Unfortunately, more often than not, the courageous are the ignorant.

You would think that people who studied a little bit more of mathematics would know better about things in general and how these things logically unfold ultimately; but again, sometimes that is asking too much and is akin to asking snail for blood. Let the man bet all he want. The horse has left the barn. It is the quality of the numbers not the quantity. Even math educator (as he is; he is no mathematician) is expected to know that much.

We move on with 5 or 500! The message is clear. All that is needed is a troika of thinker, talker and thug. History has the rest of the answer for him.

To answer the questions posed by Ellen supporters through Art Weah Doe: “Who are they?” “Where did they come from?” “Why now?” we say, the hundreds of Ellen supporters that will gather in New York in support of her and her delegates will get to know the answer(s) on Tuesday, September 24, 2013.

MOLAC and CLACI are doing what Ellen did to President Samuel K. Doe. She protested against an elected government and raised MONEY to wage wars that led to the death of 250,000 people, and displaced a million other for the sole purpose of replacing him. Unlike Ellen, MOLAC, CLACI and all freedom-loving Liberians and friends are exercising their God-giving RIGHTS, and are doing it according to international laws and the Liberian Constitution. The protest is against Ellen and her associates for the “RAMPANT CORRUPTIONS” her DISUNITY PARTY has engaged in these seven (7) years.

Our cause is not personal, it is patriotic! Politics to me is not personal but about issues. Certainly, it is about issues in policies that affect us and the environment in which we live. Therefore, our protest is not personal; it is about a group of people that are using our wealth and resources as if it belongs to them. So, we do not need a Monday morning quarterback or armchair anthropologist to tell us what to do and how we should do it. In fact, we have decided to follow in the footsteps of men like former Rep. Bill Witherspoon, former Rep. Didwho Twe, former Minister of the Interior William David Coleman, Cllr. H. Raymond Horace, former Ambassador H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr., and Pamphleteer Albert Porte who had guts to speak to power for the abuse and violation of the laws and the constitution by Liberian officials who took oath to preserve, protect and defend the Liberian people’s RIGHTS.

In conclusion, we in MOLAC and CLACI believe that “Most people will always rally around a center of power, particularly if it is the center most accessible to them and it produces the results they want…” (Bork, Robert H. (2010), Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges) These are the individuals and groups our protest is directed at. For now, let me leave with you the profound statement of the late Chinua Achebe that reads: “When old people speak it is not because of the sweetness of words in our mouths; it is because we see something which you do not see.”

See you at the UN!

Our eyes are opened; the time of the people has come!

The poem below was written by me in honor of a principled bread of patriotic Liberians with guts, who the Liberian society dismissed as being Craky (Crazy):

PATRIOTS OR CRAKY PEOPLE!

© 7/22/1972

 

At one time in Liberia

Anyone who dare challenge

The unjust practices of the

Liberian authorities

Were considered CRAKY

So I came to the conclusion that

To be CRAKY

Was not such a bad thing to be!

 

Since all of the people considered

CRAKY, were reputable people

Individuals like

Rep. Bill Witherspoon

He was considered CRAKY

For refusing to contribute

To Tubman’s Birthday Funds

Didwho Twe too was CRAKY

As well as a traitor and unpatriotic

For challenging Tubman

For the Presidency of Liberia

William David Coleman and his son

Were murdered for attempting

To rock the boat

Something had to be really wrong

With Cllr. H. Raymond Horace

For refusing to beg Tubman

As for Ambassador

H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr.

He had to be out of his mind

To be caught with Communist

Materials in his study

 

As for Oldman Albert Porte

He was not only CRAKY

He was both CRAKY and CRAZY

For challenging

The Liberian authorities

For violating the

Constitutional Rights

Of the Liberian masses

 

Based on these CRAKY behaviors

I decided as a child growing up

In Rocktown, Monrovia that

If only CRAKY people

Were the only people

Who could speak their minds

I too would like to be CRAKY

So, there and then, I realized that

After all, to be CRAKY

Was not such a bad thing to be

 

Therefore, I made a promise to myself

That when I grow up

I too would be CRAKY like

Bill Witherspoon

Rock the boat like

William David Coleman

Refuse to give up my rights

Like Billy Horace

Add to my collection of books like

H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr.

Become a traitor and unpatriotic

Just like Didwho Twe

Go CRAZY and CRAKY like

Oldman Albert Porte

 

Because to me, these individuals

Represent Liberia’s true

Civil Rights champions

Therefore, I too want to grow up

To be CRAKY just like them

 

About the Author: Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor is a poet, a Griot, journalist, cultural and political activist, and an ordained Minister of the Gospel. He is Chairman of the Liberian Democratic Future (LDF); publisher of theperspective.org online newsmagazine. He serves as Senior Advisor to the Voice of Liberia newsmagazine as well as Senior Advisor to MOLAC and CLACI. In 2012, he Co-authored Djogbachiachuwa: The Liberian Literature Anthology. He can be reached at: [email protected]

In defense of MOLAC & CLACI

By Siahyonkron Nyanseor Siahyonkron J.K. Nyanseor

Senior Advisor, MOLAC & CLACI

 

Ladies and gentlemen: I need not remind to you that our country Liberia is in leadership crisis. Liberia is in ethical morass and a state of organized BRAZEN plunder. And yes, our country is once more crying for us to expose those who use Liberia as their personal bank accounts, and their plantation to enrich themselves and their cronies at the expense of the Liberian people.

If anybody thinks the Liberian people are fools, than that person is ignorant of history. How can the Liberian people miss individuals who just yesterday were dirt poor, and out of a sudden are earning anywhere from $10 to $15,000.00 a month doing nothing but riding around in brand new cars with traveling allowances that can pay the yearly salaries of fifty persons in Liberia. How can the Liberian people miss individuals who yesterday rode “Holy, Holy” (public transportation) with many of us? Because of their new status, they acquired new-bad attitude; talk down to people as if they are their house boys and girls - with no consideration that the Liberian people deserve respect. How can the people forget such abuse that is done to them with impunity? How can they?

Based on the profound words of President Andrew Jackson, “One man with courage makes a majority.” This statement is true today as it was in his time!

One does not have to be nuclear scientist to know corrupt practices when they see it.

J. Kerkula Foeday is right to say, “Like Taylor, Ellen is today using our resources to smokescreen bad governance practices, including corruption in Liberia. We know this. So we are not surprised by the plan to use their privileged positions and ill-gotten wealth to mobilize their cronies and blind supporters to protest for corruption in Liberia.” He also said:

“So Emmett, save your money. No need for betting with anyone. It will augur well for you if you can donate the $100 to MOLAC so that we can buy and print more placards with anti-corruption messages.”

In a country where there are many poor and hungry people, money can do a lot; buy them for a while, use their own resources, which includes wealth earned from both their human and natural resources to make them feel good. History tells us that this approach is only temporarily.

Remember the phrase: “You can fool some of the people some of the time, and not all the people all of the time.” Liberians too, say: “Ninety years are not forever!”

To which C. Washington Tarpeh made an excellent observation:

“This game of yours has no absolute value/outcome. Therefore, a bet on such a game is problem prone. For example, an individual or a group of individuals may demonstrate to express their discontentment about an issue of social importance, and such discontentment may be relatively limited to this particular individual or the group of individuals. While corruption is rampant in Liberia, there are others who think the corruption in Liberia is not at a level to warrant a public demonstration. Therefore, despite the hundreds of thousands of Liberians in the US, only a small fraction of this number considers the issue of corruption fundamentally serious. Hence, the actual number of demonstrators may be less or more than 50. That said, what is important is the issue that precipitates the demonstration and NOT the actual number of demonstrators.”

On the other hand, one may have had the incentive to place a bet if the game were framed as follows: Of the hundreds of thousands of Liberians in the US, only a Zero number of Liberians will show up for the MOLAC’s planned demonstration. This game has an absolute value or a definite outcome, either nobody (0) shows up or somebody (1) shows up.

Thus, those who doubt the power of the people better watch out; history is about to be repeated. It takes “small axe to cut big tree down.” Those who do not believe in this adage should go on making fun of those of us who are dead serious of doing something about CORRUPTION in our country. They can go on betting that no more than 50 persons will attend the peace and lawful protest in New York. You watch out! Many are called, but few are chosen. If only two persons attend the peaceful protest organized by the Movement of Liberians Against Corruption (MOLAC) and the Concerned Liberians Against Corruption and Impunity (CLACI), they would have achieved their objectives. It would have achieved with personal sacrifices and funds obtained legally, and not STOLEN.

I will not be surprised if the Ellen regime mobilizes tugs and “who want work” (individuals looking for work in Liberian parlance) to show support for her corrupt government. They will be welcomed with the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, “Father forgive them for they know not what they do;” (Luke 23:34) then take their pictures to have it posted on the new website that is being developed and have them stored for the reading public to view — as individuals or groups that assists Ellen and her associates to rip the Liberian people off.

MOLAC and CLACI are following the wise saying of Confucius that reads: “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” To add to it, when you start counting, do you start from 2, 3 or 50? In the math taught me in the 50’s at Government Morning School, South Beach, you start from the NUMBER 1. That tells us that the number 1 is as important as 50 or 500. Since this is the case, if one person showed up at the UN to tell the world about the CORRUPTION in Liberia, we will be happy.

Dr. Zumo said it right:

…Every age has been one where people were afraid to speak up. This age has been one where people speak up commonly, but are afraid to offend where offense is needed. One person stepping forward to show the others what is necessary is a leader in the making. Unfortunately, more often than not, the courageous are the ignorant.

You would think that people who studied a little bit more of mathematics would know better about things in general and how these things logically unfold ultimately; but again, sometimes that is asking too much and is akin to asking snail for blood. Let the man bet all he want. The horse has left the barn. It is the quality of the numbers not the quantity. Even math educator (as he is; he is no mathematician) is expected to know that much.

We move on with 5 or 500! The message is clear. All that is needed is a troika of thinker, talker and thug. History has the rest of the answer for him.

To answer the questions posed by Ellen supporters through Art Weah Doe: “Who are they?” “Where did they come from?” “Why now?” we say, the hundreds of Ellen supporters that will gather in New York in support of her and her delegates will get to know the answer(s) on Tuesday, September 24, 2013.

MOLAC and CLACI are doing what Ellen did to President Samuel K. Doe. She protested against an elected government and raised MONEY to wage wars that led to the death of 250,000 people, and displaced a million other for the sole purpose of replacing him. Unlike Ellen, MOLAC, CLACI and all freedom-loving Liberians and friends are exercising their God-giving RIGHTS, and are doing it according to international laws and the Liberian Constitution. The protest is against Ellen and her associates for the “RAMPANT CORRUPTIONS” her DISUNITY PARTY has engaged in these seven (7) years.

Our cause is not personal, it is patriotic! Politics to me is not personal but about issues. Certainly, it is about issues in policies that affect us and the environment in which we live. Therefore, our protest is not personal; it is about a group of people that are using our wealth and resources as if it belongs to them. So, we do not need a Monday morning quarterback or armchair anthropologist to tell us what to do and how we should do it. In fact, we have decided to follow in the footsteps of men like former Rep. Bill Witherspoon, former Rep. Didwho Twe, former Minister of the Interior William David Coleman, Cllr. H. Raymond Horace, former Ambassador H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr., and Pamphleteer Albert Porte who had guts to speak to power for the abuse and violation of the laws and the constitution by Liberian officials who took oath to preserve, protect and defend the Liberian people’s RIGHTS.

In conclusion, we in MOLAC and CLACI believe that “Most people will always rally around a center of power, particularly if it is the center most accessible to them and it produces the results they want…” (Bork, Robert H. (2010), Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges) These are the individuals and groups our protest is directed at. For now, let me leave with you the profound statement of the late Chinua Achebe that reads: “When old people speak it is not because of the sweetness of words in our mouths; it is because we see something which you do not see.”

See you at the UN!

Our eyes are opened; the time of the people has come!

The poem below was written by me in honor of a principled bread of patriotic Liberians with guts, who the Liberian society dismissed as being Craky (Crazy):

PATRIOTS OR CRAKY PEOPLE!

© 7/22/1972

 

At one time in Liberia

Anyone who dare challenge

The unjust practices of the

Liberian authorities

Were considered CRAKY

So I came to the conclusion that

To be CRAKY

Was not such a bad thing to be!

 

Since all of the people considered

CRAKY, were reputable people

Individuals like

Rep. Bill Witherspoon

He was considered CRAKY

For refusing to contribute

To Tubman’s Birthday Funds

Didwho Twe too was CRAKY

As well as a traitor and unpatriotic

For challenging Tubman

For the Presidency of Liberia

William David Coleman and his son

Were murdered for attempting

To rock the boat

Something had to be really wrong

With Cllr. H. Raymond Horace

For refusing to beg Tubman

As for Ambassador

H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr.

He had to be out of his mind

To be caught with Communist

Materials in his study

 

As for Oldman Albert Porte

He was not only CRAKY

He was both CRAKY and CRAZY

For challenging

The Liberian authorities

For violating the

Constitutional Rights

Of the Liberian masses

 

Based on these CRAKY behaviors

I decided as a child growing up

In Rocktown, Monrovia that

If only CRAKY people

Were the only people

Who could speak their minds

I too would like to be CRAKY

So, there and then, I realized that

After all, to be CRAKY

Was not such a bad thing to be

 

Therefore, I made a promise to myself

That when I grow up

I too would be CRAKY like

Bill Witherspoon

Rock the boat like

William David Coleman

Refuse to give up my rights

Like Billy Horace

Add to my collection of books like

H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Sr.

Become a traitor and unpatriotic

Just like Didwho Twe

Go CRAZY and CRAKY like

Oldman Albert Porte

 

Because to me, these individuals

Represent Liberia’s true

Civil Rights champions

Therefore, I too want to grow up

To be CRAKY just like them

 

About the Author: Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor is a poet, a Griot, journalist, cultural and political activist, and an ordained Minister of the Gospel. He is Chairman of the Liberian Democratic Future (LDF); publisher of theperspective.org online newsmagazine. He serves as Senior Advisor to the Voice of Liberia newsmagazine as well as Senior Advisor to MOLAC and CLACI. In 2012, he Co-authored Djogbachiachuwa: The Liberian Literature Anthology. He can be reached at: [email protected]

It is a national (education) tragedy when 25,000 students fail university’s entrance exam

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Liberia's poor school system

 

One of the painful tragedies of the Liberian civil war is the broken education system.

The civil war did not only fatally destroyed lives and uprooted families to nearby and faraway places, it also destroyed the education system.

No joke about it! The current Liberian education system is in shambles, and needs a total and complete overhaul to meet modern and international standards.

The sad reality is, Liberian kids are walking around unable to read, write, speak proper and coherent English and do arithmetic, which makes it painfully clear that things are not the same in today’s Liberia compare to the time I was growing up and going to school there.

So where’s the national political leadership in all of this? Any leadership at all from the Executive Mansion?

Just recently, nearly 25,000 students who sat for the University of Liberia’s entrance examination and did not pass the written tests, were declared ineligible to enroll for the school year.

As usual in Liberia’s historically imperial, autocratic, centralized and quasi-democratic system, the President of Liberia holds the key to this embarrassing game of whom and which kid should be allowed to enroll in school to realize their lifelong dream of attending college.

Unsurprisingly, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf – President of Liberia (not an independent and elected school board comprised of seasoned and respected educators), quickly and unilaterally ruled that 1,800 of the 25,000 students should be admitted. Easy way out for Madam Sirleaf, isn’t it?

The piercing question now is, what happens next year when new groups of high school graduates and prospective college students, cannot pass the required college entrance tests necessary to be admitted to college?

Do we need another presidential pardon and intervention for college admission, and not the smarts and intellects of the prospective college students?

Matter of fact is, the end of the civil war has reduced the Liberian education system to a heartless moneymaking operation, where just about anybody can start a school to make money without ever consulting the Ministry of Education for guidance.

The Ministry of Education, on the other hand, has given new meaning to bureaucratic incompetence, malaise and paralysis accelerated by incessant interference from the executive branch, the obvious lack of apathy and accountability, and the lack of an aggressive and meaningful education plan that produces results in a failed school system.

From what I know, however, the public school system does not stand a chance of surviving in some parts of Liberia, simply because it has been demonized as not equipped with better teachers, inadequate or low pay, lack of incentives and poor curriculums to handle the needs of students and teachers.

The result of all of this is the introduction into the Liberian education system potpourri of mismatched, unregulated and unaccredited bands of private schools popping up across the country, masquarading as well-intentioned academic centers.

With hustlers and wannabe educators at the helm of these poorly maintained moneymaking warehouses their owners called private schools, the only choice poor and vulnerable parents who want their kids to go to school, have is to accept the only choice of education in their particular area.

That often means poor people succumbing their children to these unaccredited, unsupervised and sub-standard private schools like Nimely Brothers school in New Kru Town, and others sprouting all across Liberia like wildflowers.

As these poorly staffed, poorly maintained and unaccredited private schools sprout across all of Liberia, quite often, public schools, which are often bad-mouthed as unworthy of attending, becomes the victim.

More so, the poor kids and their unemployed poor parents who already don’t have the money are left with the burden of finding money to send their kids to private schools that proves inefficient.

Even elected member of the House of Representatives, Edward Forh, who supposedly represents the Borough of New Kru Town, and who also suppose to enact legislation to either help improve the school system, or stop the vast saturation of these fly by night private schools, himself owns a school he operates in that incredibly poverty-stricken area.

Is it not conflict of interest when a sitting member of the House of Representatives own and operate a school he profits from, even at the detriment of his poverty-stricken constituents?

Where is accountability, and where does the Ministry of Education and he Executive Mansion stand in the face of this national education tragedy?

No wonder 25,000 high school graduates failed the recent University of Liberia entrance exam.

 

 

Time for Sirleaf and national legislature to fund and seriously focus on nation's sea erosion crisis

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Beach erosion in Liberia

 

Coastal Liberian communities are in trouble.

Instead of those communities generating tourism funds for the local economy, they are fast going under water, courtesy of a decades-old sea erosion crisis often ignored by the national government.

As erosion from the Atlantic Ocean stares constantly, it is just a matter of time for some of those communities to completely disappear from this planet.

The sea erosion crisis did not happen on Sirleaf’s watch. Erosion from the Atlantic Ocean has been destroying homes for decades; yet, successive administrations have ignored the problem as if it will just go away.

Truth is, past Liberian presidents and legislature never budgeted or appropriated funds for the nation’s nagging sea erosion crisis, and never care to even put the issue on the national agenda for public debate. However, as Liberians watch helplessly, they are losing their homes in record numbers.

Even though the affected communities are still around and barely look the same, those that own homes in and around the neighborhoods are often traumatized after seeing their homes destroyed; and their loved ones homeless.

For example, the once vibrant counties like Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, and communities such as New Kru Town, Porpor Beach and West Point in Montserrado County are seriously affected by beach or sea erosion problem.

Once upon a time, it took a person miles and miles to walk from the heart of New Kru Town (“Turn-Around”) to Porpor Beach. Now the ocean is scarily in one’s face like a 3-D movie.

The Borough of New Kru Town and neighboring Porpor Beach, and West Point that once provided hope and the area’s vast pristine beaches and beachfront communities just cannot escape the daily natural assaults from the Atlantic Ocean.

The continuing neglect and lack of commitment from the national government to address the area’s erosion crisis is painfully troublesome, and has made those communities a dangerous place to live and engage in economic development.

Just recently, 2000 residents in the Porpor Beach area near New Kru Town were left homeless, as a result of sea erosion.

As usual, such natural disaster does not generate attention or rapid response from the Liberian government until something tragic happens – or until homes are destroyed and human beings are rendered homeless, or dead.

And when that happens, everybody begin to wonder, “why did it happen, and why the Liberian government failed to do something about the erosion problem in the first place”?

Even though over 180 homes went under water during the recent (August) erosion that reportedly left 2,000 people homeless, all the Sirleaf administration could do was dispatch deputy minister/internal affairs Ranny Jackson to the scene to provide the government’s usual band aid temporary solution, and pie in the sky promise of better things to come.

According to reports, Jackson, who supposedly heads the government’s disaster relief team promised that t”he Liberian government is putting together packages of assistance,” and is also “considering putting into place a response to the people’s plight.” Jackson reportedly added that government is considering the “possible relocation of those affected to other parts of Monrovia.”

Did Mr. Jackson fulfill his promise of relocating those people yet? Or did he only uttered those words for the cameras?

At the end of the day, however, Jackson reportedly donated “50 bags of rice, five cartons of oil, three bales of used clothing, buckets, slippers and soaps, among others.”

Now that the Liberian government has given these people rice and soaps to ease their pains, where are they supposed to spend the night and cook their meals? With relatives and friends? Why did the government not provide temporary housing for them?

Where are the government-subsidized homes and housing allowance for such natural disaster? If there’s ever a reason to appropriate funds to build low-income homes for poor and needy Liberians, this is the time.

The government’s knee-jerk rhetorical reaction - that it is “considering putting into place a response to the people’s plight” is not only a short-term feel-good solution to the nation’s nagging erosion crisis, it is a failed and meaningless policy that relies heavily on delivering bags of rice and soaps to temporarily tranquilize the pain and suffering of the poor, homeless and traumatized victims of that disaster.

After hearing that Jackson delivered rice to the victims, I thought it was elections season once again, since Liberian politicians and office seekers are known to deliver bags of rice to potential voters to win their support.

Since this is not the first time residents of New Kru Town, Porpor Beach, Buchanan, West Point and other parts of coastal Liberia ever experienced natural disasters, what happens the next time when there is yet another sea erosion; especially during the bad weather season i.e., the endless rainy, flooding and hurricane seasons?

Will Ranny Jackson travel to those areas to once again deliver rice and give another futuristic pie in the sky message of what the Sirleaf administration’s going to do for the next erosion victims?

As it is now, there is not even any mention of a national budget for erosion control, environmental engineering projects, beach restoration and beach cleaning, or a national policy that completely discourages and bans sand mining – the age-old practice often used by Liberians to build homes and other projects.

The Liberian nation needs a focused erosion control, environmental engineering, beach restoration and beach cleaning (environment) policy.

Doing nothing is not a policy, but neglect and lack of leadership.

The Sirleaf administration’s lack of a sea erosion policy will only continue to erase or plunge part of Liberia deep down into the Atlantic Ocean.

 

 

 

 

Time for Sirleaf and national legislature to fund and seriously focus on nation’s sea erosion crisis

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Beach erosion in Liberia

 

Coastal Liberian communities are in trouble.

Instead of those communities generating tourism funds for the local economy, they are fast going under water, courtesy of a decades-old sea erosion crisis often ignored by the national government.

As erosion from the Atlantic Ocean stares constantly, it is just a matter of time for some of those communities to completely disappear from this planet.

The sea erosion crisis did not happen on Sirleaf’s watch. Erosion from the Atlantic Ocean has been destroying homes for decades; yet, successive administrations have ignored the problem as if it will just go away.

Truth is, past Liberian presidents and legislature never budgeted or appropriated funds for the nation’s nagging sea erosion crisis, and never care to even put the issue on the national agenda for public debate. However, as Liberians watch helplessly, they are losing their homes in record numbers.

Even though the affected communities are still around and barely look the same, those that own homes in and around the neighborhoods are often traumatized after seeing their homes destroyed; and their loved ones homeless.

For example, the once vibrant counties like Sinoe, Maryland, Grand Bassa, Grand Cape Mount, and communities such as New Kru Town, Porpor Beach and West Point in Montserrado County are seriously affected by beach or sea erosion problem.

Once upon a time, it took a person miles and miles to walk from the heart of New Kru Town (“Turn-Around”) to Porpor Beach. Now the ocean is scarily in one’s face like a 3-D movie.

The Borough of New Kru Town and neighboring Porpor Beach, and West Point that once provided hope and the area’s vast pristine beaches and beachfront communities just cannot escape the daily natural assaults from the Atlantic Ocean.

The continuing neglect and lack of commitment from the national government to address the area’s erosion crisis is painfully troublesome, and has made those communities a dangerous place to live and engage in economic development.

Just recently, 2000 residents in the Porpor Beach area near New Kru Town were left homeless, as a result of sea erosion.

As usual, such natural disaster does not generate attention or rapid response from the Liberian government until something tragic happens – or until homes are destroyed and human beings are rendered homeless, or dead.

And when that happens, everybody begin to wonder, “why did it happen, and why the Liberian government failed to do something about the erosion problem in the first place”?

Even though over 180 homes went under water during the recent (August) erosion that reportedly left 2,000 people homeless, all the Sirleaf administration could do was dispatch deputy minister/internal affairs Ranny Jackson to the scene to provide the government’s usual band aid temporary solution, and pie in the sky promise of better things to come.

According to reports, Jackson, who supposedly heads the government’s disaster relief team promised that t”he Liberian government is putting together packages of assistance,” and is also “considering putting into place a response to the people’s plight.” Jackson reportedly added that government is considering the “possible relocation of those affected to other parts of Monrovia.”

Did Mr. Jackson fulfill his promise of relocating those people yet? Or did he only uttered those words for the cameras?

At the end of the day, however, Jackson reportedly donated “50 bags of rice, five cartons of oil, three bales of used clothing, buckets, slippers and soaps, among others.”

Now that the Liberian government has given these people rice and soaps to ease their pains, where are they supposed to spend the night and cook their meals? With relatives and friends? Why did the government not provide temporary housing for them?

Where are the government-subsidized homes and housing allowance for such natural disaster? If there’s ever a reason to appropriate funds to build low-income homes for poor and needy Liberians, this is the time.

The government’s knee-jerk rhetorical reaction - that it is “considering putting into place a response to the people’s plight” is not only a short-term feel-good solution to the nation’s nagging erosion crisis, it is a failed and meaningless policy that relies heavily on delivering bags of rice and soaps to temporarily tranquilize the pain and suffering of the poor, homeless and traumatized victims of that disaster.

After hearing that Jackson delivered rice to the victims, I thought it was elections season once again, since Liberian politicians and office seekers are known to deliver bags of rice to potential voters to win their support.

Since this is not the first time residents of New Kru Town, Porpor Beach, Buchanan, West Point and other parts of coastal Liberia ever experienced natural disasters, what happens the next time when there is yet another sea erosion; especially during the bad weather season i.e., the endless rainy, flooding and hurricane seasons?

Will Ranny Jackson travel to those areas to once again deliver rice and give another futuristic pie in the sky message of what the Sirleaf administration’s going to do for the next erosion victims?

As it is now, there is not even any mention of a national budget for erosion control, environmental engineering projects, beach restoration and beach cleaning, or a national policy that completely discourages and bans sand mining – the age-old practice often used by Liberians to build homes and other projects.

The Liberian nation needs a focused erosion control, environmental engineering, beach restoration and beach cleaning (environment) policy.

Doing nothing is not a policy, but neglect and lack of leadership.

The Sirleaf administration’s lack of a sea erosion policy will only continue to erase or plunge part of Liberia deep down into the Atlantic Ocean.

 

 

 

 

The world continues to focus on Junk-TV

By Clemente Ferrer Junk tv

 

Broadcasters are a window on the world from different perspectives that animate their information projects..

The right thing is to promote television events focused on causes such as peace, economic and social progress, security and coexistence among people from heterogeneous cultures. This will promote a television that in addition to distract, encourages a culture of peace, security and development.

But violence, crude morbidity and sex have become the mainstay of many television programs. The competitiveness is not based on a serious and responsible programming, but to attract the public with a banal and crude content, on the border of what is ethically permissible.

It is necessary to take appropriate action against the epidemic of vulgarity and eroticism that pervades the small screen and it just gets degrade the viewer. It is urgent to stop emitting all series violent, insolent and erotic.

It is not wrong to spend hours in front of the TV but the social passivity is wrong, because it involves not knowing to look for other ways to fill the leisure time. It is the empirical proof that something is wrong. It looks as if reading, conversation, family gatherings, meeting friends or study, would have become things of another world.

This issue becomes more serious when children are those who spend many hours in front of televisions, and even a third of their waking hours, and beyond children’s programming schedules. The Code of Self-Regulation of Child Time emissions of 17 to 20 hours, signed by the television networks and the Government in Spain, has been infringed, persistently, by all broadcasters.

In turn, young people who watch television three hours a day suffer an increased risk in interest in their training for youth and start their adult life, according to the researchs conducted by the University of Columbia and the Psychiatric Institute of New York.

In Spain, the organization “Autocontrol” examined, at the request of advertisers and media, a total of 1,500 ads aimed at children, before issuance. This figure represents an increase of 21% over the previous year.

Finally, the director of Disney Channel says, “we have a vocation to be a TV with family programming, dedicated to children up to 12 years. Our distinctive value is precisely the family”. This chain could be the alternative to the “Junk TV” chains with national coverage.

We should not allow to be true the assertion of Lope de Vega, “If the mob is stupid, it’s just to talk them silly, to please them.”

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing. [email protected]