Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for February, 2013

Humanity has misplaced happiness

By Clemente Ferrer thCAX62P4V

 

It is spreading, with great force, an ethic that considers valid a double standard for many areas of human existence. For the same reason has emerged a mentality that accepts that the end justifies the means and that everything is legitimate provided it will be valid to enjoy a happiness beyond measure. But one can never justify the means just because the end is sublime.

The output of this situation will depend on us to be united to the author of all things, so that, by the exercise of our free will, we can recognize or deny the greatness he deserves. This builds the chiaroscuro of the free will, the personal freedom.

Humanity has lost, has misplaced happiness, the joy of life, because it has refused to give up its freedom. Moreover, the truth that hovers like a mantra to free will, make us free because freedom reaches its genuine sense when acting in the service of truth.

The dilemma is that either we are children of God or prisoners of pride, of eroticism, of this tormented narcissism in which so many mortals seem to be struggling.

Furthermore, freedom carries a great responsibility that straightens life, our whole existence. A man without freedom is like “clouds without rain, blown hither and thither by the winds, autumn trees, unfruitful, twice dead, uprooted”. Where there is no intimacy with the Deity, there is a personal emptiness and in that dark, silent abyss, everything is oppression.

Augustine of Hippo wrote that wonderful hymn to freedom: God “who made you without your consent does not justify you without your consent”.

Therefore, free will and donation are not facing each other. On the contrary, they protect each other. Freedom can only be given to another by an impulse of love. A freedom without any climax, with no objective standard, no obligation, is debauchery. Because I love, because I am free, because I am willing to donate my will, for all those reasons I decide to God.

Finally, human freedom attains its full meaning when it is grown to serve the truth. The Gospel of St. John (8:32) stated that “the truth will set you free.”

Pierre Joseph Proudhon (pictured), French political theorist, son of a bartender and a humble peasant, said that freedom has “the charm of the Revolution without which the work is torture and life a long death”.

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

[email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The duties of my Liberian Legislator in District #4

By George Gorneleh Map of Liberia (Bong County)

 

In furtherance of transparency in our fragile democracy, and to hold elected officials accountable to the citizens they represent, I am following up with my January 24, 2013 article published by The Liberian Dialogue website, regarding a formal complaint filed to the Speaker of the House of Representatives against Bong County Representative Lester Paye of the 4th District. Because of the publication, citizens of District 4 have engaged in spirited discussions about the duties and responsibilities of their elected representative.
*****
The revised 1983 Liberian Constitution enumerates the duties of members of the Legislature. These duties are summarized into six basic categories:

1. Expert:

One of the duties of a legislator is to serve as an expert on many complex matters that affect his/her constituency. In order to effectively discuss potential changes in his/her district, each legislator must be able to understand and analyze the discussions and proposals on a variety of critical topics. Consequently, the legislator MUST be able to determine how a particular proposed legislation might affect the people he/she represents.

2. Budget:

Each legislator must contend with an allotted budget each fiscal year. That means whenever a new legislation is proposed, the legislator should be able to critically examine the budget, and know how any new programs will be funded by the national government, especially if the new law will adversely affect his/her district.

3. Bills and Laws:

One key duty of a legislator is to write bills that are debated and eventually voted on by the entire legislative body. If the proposed legislation passes the vote, the bill is moved on to the next step toward becoming a law. The next step invovles approval by the Senate and then sent to the President for his/her approval or rejection. If the president signs the bill, it becomes law.

4. Commission Member:

Generally, legislators are selected to become part of additional special groups known as commissions. The commissions are charged with investigating a particular issue in depth to determine if future legislation is needed to improve the situation. Commission issues can be any issue including but is not limited to abuse of legislative authority, discrimination on the basis of gender, religion, tribal origin, corruption, nepotism, poor health care delivery system, bad road conditions, schools, crimes, unfair trade practice, white collar crimes or anthing else that is deemed worthy of further investigation.

5. Communication with Constituents:

One thing elected legislators must do to retain their posts is to effectively and candidly communicate with the people who vote for them. Legislators must spend some amount of time interacting with citizens of their districts by fielding phone calls, reading letters or emails to determine what the people in their districts are concerned about. Wise legislators will vote on major issues based on the will of the poeple in their constituency. The legislator’s staff also actively responds to calls, concerns, emails and telephone calls to lighten the load on the legislator.

6. Committee Work:

In addition to representing a particular district, a legislator is often assigned to committee that takes on projects in a particular area. This committee meets when new legislation is proposed that may affect its area of expertise. Committee members review proposals and evaluate the pros and cons in a hearing. The committee eventually votes to see if the proposed legislation should be sent to the floor for a vote by all the members of the legislature.

Analysis:

Let me discuss how our national government is divided into three branches, and describe the types of checks and balances available to each branch: Legislative, executive, and judicial. These three branches are not independent of one another, because the Constitution set up a system of checks and balances to help ensure that no one branch become too powerful. Each branch has powers that it can use to check and balance the operations and power of the other two branches. The main purpose of the system is to keep the three branches in balance.

For instance, the Legislative Branch is given the power to make laws. It has the following checks over the executive branch:

· May override presidential vetoes with a two-thirds vote
· Has the power over the purse strings to actually fund any executive actions
· May remove the president through impeachment
· Senate approves treaties
· Senate approves presidential appointments

The Legislative Branch also has the following checks over the Judicial Branch:

· May create lower courts
· Senate approves appointments of judges

The Executive Branch is given the power to carry out the laws. It has the
following checks over the Legislative Branch:

· Veto power
· Ability to call special sessions of Congress
· Canrecommend legislation
· Can appeal to the people concerning legislation and more

The Executive Branch has the following checks over the Judicial Branch:

· President appoints Supreme Court and other county judges

Checks and Balances of the Judicial Branch:

· Judges, once appointed for life, are free from controls from the executive
branch
· Courts can judge executive actions to be unconstitutional through the power of
judicial review

The Judicial Branch has the following checks over the Legislative Branch:

· Courts can judge legislative acts to be unconstitutional

Conclusion:

The duties described above do not give absolute power to legislators to meddle into the functions of the other two equal branches of government. Analysis confirms the framers of the revised 1983 Constitution intentionally granted all power not specifically given to the Legislature to the people, and set up a system of checks and balances modeled after the American system of checks and balances, to keep the three branches in balance. This system has successfully served the American people for more than two centuries, and is undoubtedly the best system that protects citizens against tyrannical governments in which elected officials might be tempted to assume absolute power not granted in the Constitution.
Contact Mr. Gorneleh at: [email protected]

 

Get rid of the Ministry of Information!

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Ministry of Information - Liberia

 

Right after he and his colleagues forced their way into the Executive Mansion in 1980, after a bloody coup d’ tat that suddenly changed the political landscape of Liberia, the late President Samuel Kanyon Doe got the attention of the Liberian people when he quickly spelled out his many reasons for seizing state power.

Injustice, inequality and nepotism in the administration he dethroned seemed to be the chorus of the day. And he went on to offer many other reasons for his fatal adventure.

With the power of the state vested in him, Mr. Doe quickly eliminated the much-hated domestic spy network known to all as ‘PRO’ or Public Relations Officer, a dreaded vestige of the past used conveniently by his predecessors to strangle political dissent in order to remain in power indefinitely.

The system held Liberians back and intimidated countless others, who wanted to engage in politics at the time but couldn’t pursue their dreams because they didn’t know who was watching them.

Those Liberian leaders pitted friends against friends, brothers against brothers and neighbors against neighbors, who were supposed to lie on the other person in the name of protecting the president and his selfish political interest.

While Mr. Doe was able to eliminate the PRO system, he did not demolish its twin, the Ministry of Information, a “triangular institution, according to the Ministry’s official website, “that serve as the nerve center in propagating the policies of the Government of Liberia.”

The Ministry of Information was established by an Act of Legislature in 1965, and also by “executive law of 1972” as a propaganda machine, and one of the oldest bureaucracies in the country.

The Ministry of Information is not only an extension of the state’s propaganda and security apparatus, its Public Affairs Division serves as the nerve center of the government’s information and dissemination network, which former information minister, Laurence Bropleh suggests “accredited 600 foreign journalists; about 40 percent of these journalists epresenting various media organizations in the United States of America, Europe.”

As I perused the January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006 Annual Report and Executive Summary of the Ministry of Information, I further realized that the New Liberia newspaper established in 1978, is also an arm of the ministry’s propaganda wing, which “published 29 regular and three special editions during the period under review.”

Interestingly, the New Liberia newspaper was established during the administration of the late President William R. Tolbert Jr., who was then feeling the heat of rising political resistance, desperately needed another mouthpiece as if he did not have such avenue in the first place to tell his story.

However, the editorial policy of the New Liberia, according to former information minister, Laurence Bropleh, “remains the same to promote, interpret, analyze and explain government policies, programmes and activities for public understanding and acceptance, and to publish the views, comments and suggestions of the public for government’s attention and action, and countering misinformation, distortions and negative propaganda about the government and its functionaries.”

Do we really need a Ministry of Information to disseminate propaganda also for an Ellen Johnson Sirleaf government that prides itself as transparent and accountable to the Liberian people? If that is the case, then what’s the role of the state-owned Radio Station, Liberian Broadcasting System?

If the role of the Ministry of Information is to accredit foreign journalists as Mr. Bropleh mentioned, then what is the role of the Press Union of Liberia (PUL)? What’s the role for the Office of the Press Secretary to the President, and the communications’ wing of the Executive Mansion?

And how does the Ministry of Information help the Liberian people go from point A to point B in their daily activities? If Liberia is a democratic republic, then why fund and keep a ministry whose primary mission is to undermine the aspirations of the people through false propaganda, as is the case with noted totalitarian governments such as North Korea, the People’s Republic of China, and other repressive governments?

Historically, the Ministry of Information and its sister organs shamelessly and unprofessionally promoted the undemocratic governments of Tubman, Tolbert, Doe and Taylor, even as the human rights of the Liberian people were being violated on a daily basis by those leaders.

The Liberian people, however, did not expect the Ellen Johnson Sirleaf administration to remind them of the past while using the same old methods, tactics and propaganda of the Ministry of Information to twist the facts and lie to them daily on issues such as nepotism, corruption, etc.

In an era of optimism, nation-building and confidence-building, the Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf administration failed the Liberian people when she retained the symbols of oppression to manipulate public opinion and influence public debate to make her administration look good.

The ongoing controversy regarding the hiring of presidential sons, Robert, Charles and Fumba Sirleaf to sensitive and influencial positions by their mother, and in her administration, which of course is nepotism, did not go well with most Liberians.

Sirleaf’s faulty, insensitive, arrogant and politically expedient explanation for the hiring of her sons is a reason why the need for a neutral, independent and a free press in the Liberian nation cannot be overlooked.

Not too long ago, I wrote on this page that the Liberian Petroleum Refining Company (LPRC) should be privatized or abolished because it has become a money-wasting enterprise that only benefits the politically connected, and those who come into public service to steal and get rich quick.

The best operating practice in any private or public setting - in this case the Liberian government is not to continue to fuel, tolerate or subsidize corruption by allowing public corporations to bleed financially because of mismanagement and inefficiency.

When these public institutions cannot produce results or failed to live up to the reasons for their creation, it is wise to shut them down completely, and put the money to other visually practical public policy endeavors such as education, sanitation and healthcare, to make a massive difference in the lives of the Liberian people.

As a political/opinion writer, I am sure some will hastingly question my motives for this piece and other articles, or will wonder before digesting my argument why I am suggesting that the Ministry of Information be abolished?

However, as I have written in this piece and in other articles, it is not about me; but about a country we all claim to love, and we want to see prosper and liveable.

Getting there requires bold and visionary leadership, and making tough decisions. Abolishing the Ministry of Information is one of those tough decisions.

The monster must go!

Open letter to Her Excellency, President Ellen Johnson- Sirleaf

By Sam-Mohammed Kromah Sam Mohammed Kromah

 

The deafening sound of silence is one of the most lethal weapons used by the most skilled verbal assassins, while their rambunctious adversaries use any and every opportunity to speak their piece.

These unique individuals choose their battles very cleverly and wisely, speaking only when theyhave completely wielded the power to annihilate the enemy with their perfect words, forcing them to cease their loquacious mannerisms with one well though-out blow, and that’s a kill-shot.

As the teakettle whistles, the inhabitants of the kitchen realize that the temperature gauge has reached its boiling point. The atmosphere is filled with both joy and nervousness. The myopic minds expect the tea to be served at any moment, and the great minds know that if nothing is done about the whistling, the tea party could turn into a disaster.

The three options suggested are: (1) reduce the temperature under the kettle, (2) remove the kettle from the burner, or (3) stuff the whistling hole. The last option could potentially lead to an explosion, and anyone who is in close proximity could get burned.

Last night, my home was burglarized. I was fortunate, thanks to the Almighty Allah, that no one was hurt, and nothing of importance was taken; only four plastic chairs. The compound was saved, and I don’t think anything happened to the burglars.

However, what I have not been able to digest since the incident is, what level of desperation could possess a person to climb over an eleven foot concrete ward to take nothing but four old plastic chairs?

When one adds all these multiple issues; armed robbery, burglary, phone and jewelry snatching, and other neighborhood and community ills, the only thing you smell is trouble. Also, one of the scariest things I see around every neighborhood is the idle young men and women. Most of whom are hunting for the next meal.

In some areas, you see a young person with a little square table, approximately not more than $30.00 in value in scratch cards. Interestingly he/she has three to five other idle friends with folded arms, praying for someone to light the next match so they can burn the neighborhood or the town.

If we continue to ignore, disregard, and compromise these sensitive issues and do not take proactive steps to address them, it has the propensity to result into a distasteful and disastrous social discontent, or could create a wedge between civility and decorum. Emotions will indeed shift into high gea,r and nine times out of ten violence becomes inevitable.

I speak from experience, because I worked as a caseworker in Baltimore City, Foster Care System, a Staff Assistant in the Maryland Child Welfare System, and an Administrator for the Department of Human Resources for the State of Maryland for about two decades. I know what it is to have three idle youths, standing with no hope.

Right now, our country is consumed by a complex web of inter-related social issues that require the involvement of every able Liberian. It is assumed that it is President Sirleaf’s sole responsibility, but this issue is far too big for Her Excellency, only to chew.

This is everyone’s burden; not hers alone to carry. Expectations are not only high and complex, but conflicting. The moral fabric of our nation is threatened. Concern for community and compassion for fellow human beings are replaced by madness, greed, hatred, desperation, the lack of empathy and sympathy, the lack of impulse control and social deftness, deficit in emotion, and the general loss of civility and decorum; and finally, the loss of inter-personal and social behaviors.

Most of you might not know that I contested in the 2011 Legislative contest in District # 6 and lost. God first, but I contribute my lost to one major factor, being a Mandingo and a Muslim, the two titles that I am unapologetically proud to have.

I remember one day, when my presidential aspirant, Cllr. Charles Walker Brumskin called me and said: “Sam, please do not let this discourage you. I just had two women, Kpelle and Bassa say, though you speak Kpelle better than most people they know, they will not vote for you because you are Mandingo”. My campaign message was very strong, experience in administration was second to none, my international contacts were un-paralleled, and I visited more neighborhoods than any of the 10 candidates.

The loss in District #6 confirmed the message, and was also a sobering declaration of the dialectic relationship that exists between Islam/Christianity and Mandingo/the rest of the tribes. When such happens to you, only prayers can protect you from being righteously indignant.

That definitively reinforced my desire to push on to reconciliation. It is the only rational answer to our national problem. Efforts have to be made in order to develop a way of challenging the innumerable myths and misconceptions through a combined use of both historical analysis and micro-empirical assessment, not in theory, chicanery, or the usual shenanigans, but through sincerity. Strong recommendations have to be made by policy makers, scholars, and people of goodwill to promote reconciliation in its purest sense.

Such a recommendation should suggest that we each re-examine our own attitudes as individuals, as ethnic groups, as religious groups, and as a nation; for our attitudes are essential to our ultimate goal. It is noted that we do not respect others.

We speak of other tribes as if they are nothing; yet, we expect respect from them. The bottom line is we do not respect ourselves as a nation. Foreign goods and items are always better. We should never think that reconciliation is impossible and unreal. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable and that we are doomed and gripped by forces we cannot control.

We should not and will not accept that. Our problems are man-made. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Our focus should be on practical reconciliation; not on a sudden revolution in human nature, but on a gradual evolution in relevant institutions, a series of concrete actions, and effective and realistic agreements, which are in the best interest of all concerned.

No group of people is so evil that they are considered lacking in virtue. We are each different in one way or another. I am not asking or suggesting that we be blind to our differences. What I am saying is that we must direct our attention to our common interests and to the means, by which, those differences can be resolved and/or transformed into a useful finished product. Diversity is a source of power and enrichment. No two things are identical in its purest sense. God created diversity for strength and enrichment. Because we are simple, we use that as reason to discriminate and try to reduce God to our size.

It is our duty to our nation to diversify if we yearn for her to flourish. For in the final analysis, our most common link is that we all inhabit this land. We all breathe the same air. We all want our children to say, “Papa nah come”. We all cherish our children’s futures, and we are all mortal.

We have to sharpen our national spirit and leadership skills and remember that leaders must create harmony from discord by changing destructive forces around us and transforming them into positive pursuits, which will benefit us all. We should remember that great leaders show their greatness by the powerful of their examples , not by the example of their power, and by the way they treat the opposition and the less fortunate.

If we define our goals more clearly (from clarity comes understanding, and from understanding comes knowledge) by making it more manageable and less remote; we can help everyone to visualize it, to draw hope from it, and to move irresistible towards it. Reconciliation is peace and peace restores hope and hope is the standard bearer of life. In the absence of hope, life degenerates.

Our failure to focus on the reconciliatory process has led us on the path of dangerous ethnic loyalty above our national interests. It has fueled greed, hatred, intolerance, vengeance, and tricks, among others. We need not be reminded that these and some of the cultural values we each endear are repulsive and repugnant to all democratic values and nation building.

It was not always like that. We co-existed with respect and tolerance. Today, many of us see nothing in the dignity and glory of this great nation to protect. If given the chance, a typical Liberian could sell anything of this nation if they can find a buyer. A typical Liberian will do anything to a fellow Liberian or institution just to prove a point.

We destroyed the Sandi and the Poro Schools, burned Mosques and Churches, and damaged the Masonic Temple. If we add it all together, the sum translates to understanding the reasoning behind why the country and the people are in this current state of disarray. Most of us do not think beyond our little selves and our tribes to protect Liberia. Our failure as people to put Liberia first could be the actual cause of the collapse of this Republic. The biggest tragedy of this madness we called “the civil war” is, we did not learn anything from it.

One could remain aloof if the lives and the future of this country were not sliding towards an abyss of violence. The saddest reality that continues to dawn on some of us is that we do not find enough people on our side to fulfill God’s will for the final reconciliation of all Liberians.

If we fail as a people to live together in unity and hormony we will definitely die together as fools. However, I do find consolation in the Marxian interpretation of reality, Dialectical Materialism, viewing matter as a sole subject of change and all change as the product of constant conflict between opposites arising from the internal contradiction inherent ion all things.

Maybe out of our extraordinary human and material disasters, for the past decades must be born a brighter Liberia of which all humanity will be proud. Our attitudes must produce an actual national reality that will reinforce humanity’s belief and sustain all our hopes for a glorious life for all.

I have no hesitation in saying that everyone of us is as intimately attached to this land as the other. Each time anyone of us touches this soil we feel a sense of personal renewal. We are all moved by a sense of joy and sadness when our national anthem is played. That spiritual and physical oneness we all share with this common homeland explains the depth of the pain we all carry in our hearts as we see our beloved Liberia that once was the beacon of Africa, tearing itself apart due to madness.

TODAY, I CHALLENGE EACH AND EVERYONE OF US TO MAKE A COMMITMENT TO BUILD A PEACEFUL, DEMOCRATIC, AND RECONCILIATORY LIBERIA, AND NEVER AGAIN WILL WE RESOLVE TO VIOLENCE.

Madam President, let this message be taken to the high plains of Mount Nimba. Let it be sent to the thick and virgin forest of Grand Gedeh. Let it be heard by the meandering rivers of Grand Kru and River Cess. Let it be echoed by the river banks of St. Paul, the St. John, and the Cavalla. Let it be transmitted by the beautiful banks of Lake Piso, and the shining beaches of Monrovia and Buchannan. Let it be celebrated on the fertile land of Bong and Lofa. And let it reach to every place in Liberia, and to every Liberian everywhere.

Fellow Liberians, let us enter into a covenant that we will build a Liberia in which all of us will be able to walk tall without any fear in our hearts, assured of our inalienable rights of human dignity. My brothers and sisters, we are decedents of pyramid builders and builders of empires. Do what ever it takes to protect our posterity and patrimony (Liberia). Do not wallow into a state of complacency, and pity. Do anything, conspire, inspire, perspire, aspire but please, do not ever retire!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How the media contributed to intolerance in today's society

By Charles L. Massaquoi Charles L. Massaquoi

 

Journalism is one of the oldest professions in the world. For years, many people in society look to journalists because journalism is one of the noble professions in the entire world.

I am sad to admit that some journalists are losing the respect they once had because journalism today,is about business as usual. Some journalists are focusing on the negative news, because negative news sells like a hot commodity. I strongly believe that journalists should base their reports on facts rather than on their feelings.

I came to Sweden in 1991, and my lifelong dream of becoming a journalist became a reality when I enrolled at the Nordic College of Journalism, a private college in Smaland. The NCJ is the only college in the Scandinavian Countries and perhaps in Europe, which trains editorial and cultural journalists, who will be able to stand up for the truth and against disinformation. As compared to other higher institutions of learning in Sweden, NCJ offers courses like Mass Media, Economics, Political Science, and Religion, which are unique to would-be journalists.

The role of any reporter in a society is to present the truth. Journalists should be neutral, and the best way to do this is to avoid one-sided reporting. Journalists should report the news, and let the public make the decision. This is not the case in the world today because journalists are behaving like politicians, and are making important decisions in the community.
Sweden has one of the freest press in the world, and the style of reporting is the main issue.

Freedom of the press is a right but that right does not give reporters the tool to publish lies. A classic example is Israel. I read Ramon Bennett’s book, “Philistine: The Great Deception,” and the section on the news media is quite interesting. As one continues to read the book, he gets the notion that some journalists from different parts of the world “do not report Israel, they are at war with Israel.”

The Continent of Africa

Reports from Africa has been biased and inaccurate. I am not saying Africa does not have problems, but the Western media is only reporting negative news such as famine, corruption, HIV/AIDS, malnutrition and poverty. An African living in Sweden once asked a reporter this question: “Why the news report from Africa is so bad? The journalist responded this way: “We are only selling what we have.”

However, Somalia is a special country in Africa but there is no good news from Somalia. In fact, these are the headlines from Western reporters about Africa: “Nigeria is the most corrupt country in Africa. Somalia is a war-torn country, Zimbabwean President Mugabe is a ruthless Dictator, The rape culture in South Africa and Ethiopians are dying from starvation.”

African Journalists and Censorship

It is prestigious for African journalists to work for such big news organizations like VOA, CNN, and BBC. The only dilemma for the African Journalists is that BBC or CNN tell the reporter to cover the news story. .. News organizations must rely on Western correspondents to file stories, given that they want the story reported through the lens of Western interests… “This perception also presupposes there must be a Western angle conveyed in reporting; otherwise there might be no coverage.”

Reporting Africa

According to African scholar Dr. Djibril Diallo, “nowwhere in the world does the media focus more upon crisis than in Africa.” Ashahed M. Muhammad, an African American Journalist, puts it this way, “ western media coverage of Africa focuses primarily on disease, starvation, and war…”

Most of the Western journalists do not know the history of Africa from a wider scope. So there is a growing tendency to report the news without doing any good research. Another problem is the language. Some of the journalists do not speak any African language, as such English is the only way of communicating ideas.

Editorial Page

The most important page of any magazine or newspaper is the editorial page. The only problem is that 5% of society reads the editorial page. Everyone is interested in the headlines. I mean, we value breaking news more than the editorial pages. By reading the editorial page of the magazine or newspaper, an individual can pinpoint the political ideology of the paper. You can tell whether it is right-wing, left-wing, conservative, liberal or mainstream journalism.

Many ways to fight Racism and Intolerance

I support the ideas of former UN General Assembly President Harri Holkeri of Finland, who said: “Freedom of the press and the free flow of information and ideas are powerful ways to combat, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. Societies that inhibit freedom of expression also inhibits the full enjoyment of human rights and foster intolerance.”

China is a developed nation

The only problem is human rights. Tolerance is the thing of the past in China. I hope the people of North Korea will learn from the South Koreans. Recent developments in Iran shows that some societies are not ready for tolerance.

“Creating tolerance-vital necessity in tomorrow society”

Journalists must realize that the media has a function in society, and as the guardian and watchdog of a nation, journalists can avoid scandals by focusing on the good, bad, and ugly. The media must not use language that is offensive to some group, and reporters should use the freedom of the press in the right way or they will lose it. The media can combat intolerance by refusing to inflame hatred among different people.

The late human rights lawyer Gani Fawehinmi of Nigeria spent his entire life fighting intolerance. Gani Fawehinmi was right when he advised individuals to “stand up for what is right, even If you are standing alone.” The media should be mindful of how they treat people from different parts of the world, because what they show, what they write, and what they say will affect people in a different way.

Charles L. Massaquoi is a Liberian Journalist/Media Analyst, who is currently residing in Malmo City, Sweden. Website www.nanews.net. He can be reached at [email protected].

How the media contributed to intolerance in today’s society

By Charles L. Massaquoi Charles L. Massaquoi

 

Journalism is one of the oldest professions in the world. For years, many people in society look to journalists because journalism is one of the noble professions in the entire world.

I am sad to admit that some journalists are losing the respect they once had because journalism today,is about business as usual. Some journalists are focusing on the negative news, because negative news sells like a hot commodity. I strongly believe that journalists should base their reports on facts rather than on their feelings.

I came to Sweden in 1991, and my lifelong dream of becoming a journalist became a reality when I enrolled at the Nordic College of Journalism, a private college in Smaland. The NCJ is the only college in the Scandinavian Countries and perhaps in Europe, which trains editorial and cultural journalists, who will be able to stand up for the truth and against disinformation. As compared to other higher institutions of learning in Sweden, NCJ offers courses like Mass Media, Economics, Political Science, and Religion, which are unique to would-be journalists.

The role of any reporter in a society is to present the truth. Journalists should be neutral, and the best way to do this is to avoid one-sided reporting. Journalists should report the news, and let the public make the decision. This is not the case in the world today because journalists are behaving like politicians, and are making important decisions in the community.
Sweden has one of the freest press in the world, and the style of reporting is the main issue.

Freedom of the press is a right but that right does not give reporters the tool to publish lies. A classic example is Israel. I read Ramon Bennett’s book, “Philistine: The Great Deception,” and the section on the news media is quite interesting. As one continues to read the book, he gets the notion that some journalists from different parts of the world “do not report Israel, they are at war with Israel.”

The Continent of Africa

Reports from Africa has been biased and inaccurate. I am not saying Africa does not have problems, but the Western media is only reporting negative news such as famine, corruption, HIV/AIDS, malnutrition and poverty. An African living in Sweden once asked a reporter this question: “Why the news report from Africa is so bad? The journalist responded this way: “We are only selling what we have.”

However, Somalia is a special country in Africa but there is no good news from Somalia. In fact, these are the headlines from Western reporters about Africa: “Nigeria is the most corrupt country in Africa. Somalia is a war-torn country, Zimbabwean President Mugabe is a ruthless Dictator, The rape culture in South Africa and Ethiopians are dying from starvation.”

African Journalists and Censorship

It is prestigious for African journalists to work for such big news organizations like VOA, CNN, and BBC. The only dilemma for the African Journalists is that BBC or CNN tell the reporter to cover the news story. .. News organizations must rely on Western correspondents to file stories, given that they want the story reported through the lens of Western interests… “This perception also presupposes there must be a Western angle conveyed in reporting; otherwise there might be no coverage.”

Reporting Africa

According to African scholar Dr. Djibril Diallo, “nowwhere in the world does the media focus more upon crisis than in Africa.” Ashahed M. Muhammad, an African American Journalist, puts it this way, “ western media coverage of Africa focuses primarily on disease, starvation, and war…”

Most of the Western journalists do not know the history of Africa from a wider scope. So there is a growing tendency to report the news without doing any good research. Another problem is the language. Some of the journalists do not speak any African language, as such English is the only way of communicating ideas.

Editorial Page

The most important page of any magazine or newspaper is the editorial page. The only problem is that 5% of society reads the editorial page. Everyone is interested in the headlines. I mean, we value breaking news more than the editorial pages. By reading the editorial page of the magazine or newspaper, an individual can pinpoint the political ideology of the paper. You can tell whether it is right-wing, left-wing, conservative, liberal or mainstream journalism.

Many ways to fight Racism and Intolerance

I support the ideas of former UN General Assembly President Harri Holkeri of Finland, who said: “Freedom of the press and the free flow of information and ideas are powerful ways to combat, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. Societies that inhibit freedom of expression also inhibits the full enjoyment of human rights and foster intolerance.”

China is a developed nation

The only problem is human rights. Tolerance is the thing of the past in China. I hope the people of North Korea will learn from the South Koreans. Recent developments in Iran shows that some societies are not ready for tolerance.

“Creating tolerance-vital necessity in tomorrow society”

Journalists must realize that the media has a function in society, and as the guardian and watchdog of a nation, journalists can avoid scandals by focusing on the good, bad, and ugly. The media must not use language that is offensive to some group, and reporters should use the freedom of the press in the right way or they will lose it. The media can combat intolerance by refusing to inflame hatred among different people.

The late human rights lawyer Gani Fawehinmi of Nigeria spent his entire life fighting intolerance. Gani Fawehinmi was right when he advised individuals to “stand up for what is right, even If you are standing alone.” The media should be mindful of how they treat people from different parts of the world, because what they show, what they write, and what they say will affect people in a different way.

Charles L. Massaquoi is a Liberian Journalist/Media Analyst, who is currently residing in Malmo City, Sweden. Website www.nanews.net. He can be reached at [email protected].

“A time for transformation?”

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh ellen j sirleaf

 

President Sirleaf’s vision for transforming Liberia took a rhetorical twist during her Annual Message to the 53rd National Legislature recently when she spoke of “a time for transformation” in a nation besieged by abject poverty, nepotism, record unemployment, rampant corruption and violent crime.

Even as Sirleaf carefully mapped out a strategy to possibly change the mind-boggling problems that she created or inherited from previous administrations, living conditions continues to be unbearable for millions who have nowhere to turn for assistance.

For this President to speak glowingly of a time to transform Liberia seven years into her second term is a tough sell, because the visual images of poverty, nepotism and record unemployment are glaringly conspicous in the tired eyes and hungry stomachs of little children and adults who are at risks everyday of not functioning in Ellen’s Liberia.

The issues of poverty and unemployment are evident everywhere in Liberia. And the best way for this President to make herself and her administration look good is to make something (prosperity) up as if the Liberian people are incapable of seeing and feeling what is happening to them.

In the excerpt below, Sirleaf said these words to mute public criticism of her administration.

“The administration managed the National Budget with efficiency while consolidating existing and instituting new reforms. During fiscal year 2012/13, actual revenue came in very close to expectations for the year, totaling US$509 million, just 2 percent lower than the projection off US$521 million – an increase of US$101 million compared to the previous year of US$407 million.”

“The revenue performance was driven by Tax Revenue sources, which made up US$393 million or 77 percent of total revenue. Of this, taxes on International Trade contributed US$153 million; Income and Profits, US$150 million; Property Taxes – far too low – US2.6 million; US$20 million on other taxes, and Taxes on Goods and Services, US$66 million,” President Sirleaf noted in her annual message.

There are obvious reasons for skepticism even as Sirleaf continues to trumpet her administration’s strongest achievements of debt relief, tax collection, international trade and the institution of fiscal reforms, which are absolutely necessary for any country to have a strong and vibrant economy.

However, with every tax dollars collected, every international trade deal signed, and every debt relieved, Sirleaf’s impractical rhetoric is not matching up with the day-to-day realities of present day Liberia.

That is because the daily lives of the Liberian people seems to be at the end of the totem pole economically; because the so-called ‘good’ things that Sirleaf enunciated in her address are not trickling down to the average “Joe Blow” on the streets of Liberia.

True indeed, unemployment is high in the Sirleaf administration. With such an optimistic assessment of the economy coming from Sirleaf, however, is there a reason why rice, the nation’s staple is still being imported, and the Liberian people are still buying and paying for goods and services in U.S. dollars instead of the government’s own “Liberty” currency? Why did the President not address this particular issue?

Like any group of people worldwide, Liberians want to live in a decent, prosperous and a safe and law-abiding nation. That dream eluded them for over a century when successive presidents and dictators took the aspirations of their people as a threat to their own regimes.

The election of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to the highest political office of the land, even though controversial, signaled hope for many who saw her ascent to that office as a sign of good things to come for their families and the Liberian nation.

However, as is the case with Liberian presidents (in my life time, and in my parents and grandparents’ lifetime), retention and the absolute exercise of raw power and political control seems to be reasons for seeking the office of president, in the first place.

While it is so true that Liberian presidents are required by law to present an annual report or message to the Liberian people, the report at least should be comprehensive, visionary and inspiring.

Unfortunately, Sirleaf’s January 28 annual message to the Liberian people failed the test, because it is not inspiring; it is vague, futuristic and uncertain, and also paints a rosy picture of the ‘accomplishments’ of her administration, which are sadly on par with human suffering, unemployment and corruption that defines her administration.

Sirleaf’s annual message to the Liberian people also intentionally omitted critical issues that are key to the nation’s path to development and genuine reconciliation.

President Sirleaf’s annual message did not adequately address issues such as the seizure of tribal land by the government and multinational companies; the compensation of landowners, and the road to genuine national reconciliation put forward by her own Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).

Instead, Sirleaf appointed the politically unsavvy, confused and reticent opposition leader, George Weah, as her ‘Peace Ambassador’ to lead what? Her narrow vision of Peace and Reconciliation in Liberia.

Regarding the land issue, the Sirleaf administration, however, gave a vague and elongated political explanation for her actions, which according to the President is “consistent with international best practices” known as “Free Prior and Informed Consent” (FPIC).

Is this Liberian President saying that those poor rural landowners or say, urban landowners will not be compensated for their land because of Sirleaf’s interpretation of some “Free Prior and Informed Consent” decree crafted by someone across the Atlantic in Europe or North America, in violation of a Liberian citizen’s rights and the sovereignty of the Liberian nation?

According to a recent international press report, the land policy of the Sirleaf administration has led to an uptick in the sale of the nation’s rural lands and natural resources. This has also led to an increase in complaints from rural dwellers and tribal groups and others, who are concerned about their future; as they are being threatened or already thrown off their land to make way for multinational companies.

The government and the multinational companies cannot forcibly grab the land of those people because they have the power to do so. Those tribal lands have to be given back to the rightful owners, or the individuals must be compensated, period!

President Sirleaf also did not touch the burning issue of nepotism during her annual report to the Liberian people, which enveloped over the years. Key to the national grievance is her hiring of her three sons: Fumba, Robert and Charles Sirleaf, to influential positions in government.

President Sirleaf paid lip service to the call for a decentralized government; but did not address term limits for Senators, which is an unbelievable 9 years, and a record 7 years for Representatives. Sirleaf did not address accountability in government and the imperial presidency, and did not discuss the need for a neutral and independent judiciary that focuses on the genuine interpretation of the law, and the rule of law for all Liberians.

NOCAL and LPRC, the national oil and refining companies that her son Robert heads, and also headed by T. Nelson Williams, are in the news constantly for corruption and the mismanagement of funds. The President did not touch the troubles in those institutions.

Education: On the issue of education, President Sirleaf admitted the lack of “adequately trained teachers and lack of textbooks and facilities such as libraries and laboratories.” She however hinted, “a return to the boarding system is being pursued.” Teachers are underpaid, and students are not getting adequate education. Sirleaf did not address those issues.

Transportation? President Sirleaf vaguely talked about “a master plan” and NTA buses, but did not unveil a comprehensive transportation plan or strategy for the metro Monrovia region that deals with the chronic lack of commercial taxis and buses to take commuters to their various destinations during rush hour.

Healthcare? Hypertension and diabetes and other treatable diseases continue to be a leading killer in Liberia. What are the government’s plans? Most Liberians are required to pay U.S dollars that they already don’t have before they are ever admitted to a government hospital for treatment. Why? Sirleaf did not touch those issues, either.

Finally, Sirleaf’s 53rd annual message is light on substance and practicality, and high on rhetoric and pageantry.

 

How George Weah and Samuel Tweah screwed the CDC over

By: Paul Paulay Jackson- [email protected] Paul Jackson
Contributing Writer

It is more than just a coincidence that only the letter “T” separates the name “Tweah” from “Weah”, or is there something more sinister to this political bromance between these two CDC stalwarts? It seems the CDC, through some of its powerful members have begun outsourcing its political conscience to the misdirection and gross misrule of President Sirleaf.

The Liberian people absolutely have nothing against two powerful political parties building consensus; or their leaders working together to better the country. But this cannot and MUST not be done at the expense of our hungry citizens, and the deplorable living conditions our poor citizens continue to live in. Just because Weah and Tweah, like President Sirleaf and her children can all afford to visit America for treatment when they get sick or can afford more than three meals a day, do not mean the political struggle is over.

A few months ago, Mr. Samuel Tweah, in a verbally expensive opinion piece written on
The Coaliation of Concern Liberian Forums (CCL), appealed to members of the CDC and
ordinary Liberians to see wisdom in forging cooperation with our current political
leadership.

His piece, while rich in rhetoric, was not only the coming out
job-seeking party for some executives of the CDC, it was also a precursor to a
selfish and wicked kind of political gamesmanship. Weah, not too long after Tweah’s
piece, quickly became a Unity Party operative and the clueless and usless pawn (aka
“Peace Ambassador”) used by Madam Sirleaf to lend legitimacy to her reign of
countless errors. Mr. Tweah for his part now enjoys an extremely lucrative
“consultant” position at the Finance Ministry.

With all these good tiddings from the President, who better than the loquacious and
“politically correct Tweah, could the CDC hierarchy send to vanquish the truth and
destroy every meaningful social and political value the poor and ordinary CDC
members have been trying to defend over more than five years now? And while the
average CDcian sees this as a “lown down dirty” political shame and betrayal, the
Acarious Grays and George Weahs of the party continue to insist that any thing
coming out of Tweah’s head, no matter how politically disturbing, deserves some
sort of universal acceptance by all party members. What a travesty?!

The politically savvy Tweah has now ushered in a new set of values and spawned new
standards of how political cooperation must be achieved by the CDC and the Liberian
people in general. It is now okay to join forces with the oppressors!

The days of disagreements are over, and maintaining a truthful and well orchestrated political
stance against a dysfunctional political establishment is now taboo, because it runs
antithetical to the sefish political and economic whims of a greedy few. As
long as the current government can absorb George Weah and members of his inner
circle, it is damn well okay to foster political cooperation, no matter how sordid
or grotesque the arrangement seems.

This is exactly the kind of political malaise and organizational malignancy that has
plagued Liberia since its independence - a malignancy that has tied the tongues of
many well meaning citizens, a malignancy that continues to visit cowardice on our
collective political psyche as a nation and a people.

This is exactly the kind of political malaise and organizational malignancy that has
plagued Liberia since its independence- a malignancy that has tied the tongues of
many well meaning citizens, a malignancy that continues to visit cowardice on our
collective political psyche as a nation and a people.

Thank God for the likes of Tiawon and Negablee Warner; great Liberian men who have
the fortitude and political balls to embrace hunger and hardship in a day and age where
where selfish political opportunism reigns supreme; men who can look Madam Sirleaf
fairly and squarly in the face and say: “Madam President, thank you for the job offer and
other bribes, but the plight of the suffering Liberian people is more important than huge
other bribes, but the plight of the suffering Liberian people is more important to
bank accounts and your patronage.”

For now, we say more power to political sycophancy! More power to avarice! More power
to the almost dead CDC. One day very soon, Madam Sirleaf, like many failed
Liberian Presidents, will be gone! One day, good women and men of conscience will
propel Liberia to greater and equal heights.

May God and our ancestors Bless Liberia!

[email protected]