Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for September, 2014

Dougbeh Nyan’s congressional moment

Dr. Dougbeh Chris NyanBy Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

 

 

Unlike Elphinstone Birch who did not see Dr. Nyan’s Ebola presentation before the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee of the US House of Representatives before telling his readers that Nyan wasn’t one of the participants, I saw the presentation on youtube and believed it was Dr. Dougbeh Chris Nyan who was speaking.

I listened to Dr. Nyan’s presentation over and over not to beat him for his effort, but to also applaud him for addressing a group that holds enormous weight in finding a solution to the Ebola crisis.

As I applaud him publicly for having the courage to address the subcommittee of the US House of Representation on the Ebola crisis raging in Liberia and the West African region, I also want to differ with him about his singular appearance and other part of his presentation.

With all the adulations pouring in from his many supporters on his behalf for his appearance, some could see my disagreement with him as the equivalent of an apostasy – for daring to get out of the box and publicly question a guy who takes his own time and energy and consciousness to do what we all want folks to do – that is to find a group or a solution to the Ebola crisis in our country.

As a research physician, no one understands medicine and Ebola better than Dr. Nyan. As such, I don’t claim to be an expert or hold a high ground to debate this issue and its tragic consequences with him.

What I can do is ask why Dr. Nyan had to appear before the subcommittee alone as ‘Director of the Secretariat’ of this new and obscure ‘Diaspora Liberia Emergency Response Task Force on the Ebola Crisis?’ According to him, his group has already airlifted 4,000 lbs of medical supplies to help with Ebola in Liberia.

Why did Dr. Nyan not appear with Liberian doctors – his colleagues to make a case about Ebola in their homeland before the subcommittee?

Also, with their enormous expertise, why did Dr. Nyan not mobilize Liberian and foreign doctors to volunteer and travel to Liberia, to assist the (foreign volunteer doctors) that are already in Liberia, working to cure Liberians, and also contain Ebola?

Because numbers and visuals matter when mobilizing support for a cause, I wanted to see along with Dr. Nyan on stage in Washington D.C. Liberian-born-US-based doctors and those living in other parts of the world, speaking cohesively on this issue under a banner that reads: “Liberian Medical Association.”

I am not interested in a personal political crusade that thrusts a singular person in the limelight to make name for himself and get that perfect sound bite and photo-ops of the day. I am interested in a genuinely solid collective representation that delivers practical results.

I am not suggesting that a singular activist representation delivers no result. However, the doctor that Nyan is would have gotten greater results, cooperation and credibility on the issue had he reached out to his colleagues, his fellow countrymen and women who understands the non-political, medical aspect of Ebola to make a biting case.

As Ebola takes a toll on families and countries, Diaspora groups representing the various countries are using every available platform to draw attention to a menacing virus that has taken away thousands of lives, threatened governments and devastated economies.

Not that Dr. Nyan is believed to have capitalized on Ebola to raise personal funds. The concern is, as the virus spreads and becomes difficult to contain, some individuals are already using the crisis to raise their own profiles and raise funds for their organizations without any form of accountability, as some famously did during the Liberian civil war.

That said, I want to move on briefly to another part of Dr. Nyan’s presentation.

Liberia is a poor country. Liberia is also a sovereign nation. Being a poor country does not mean surrendering those historical rights guranteed under a country’s constitution.

The Ebola crisis is not the place for “mainly the US to take immediate control of the healthcare system of Liberia,” as Dr. Nyan suggested in his presentation.

What the US can do is work with the Liberian government as collaborative partners to rebuild Liberia’s broken healthcare system.

Also, I am not so crazy about Liberia’s so-called “special relationship” or historical ties with the US, as Dr. Nyan mentioned.

Any special relationship with no strings attached?

What’s so special about Liberia’s relationship with the US when Liberian citizens are expected and required to be in line at embassies to apply for visas, like citizens of countries with no special relationship with the US do everyday?

What special “links?”

Liberians work hard to earn everything they own in this country. “Special relationship” with the United States is not and has never been a passport for Liberians to win special favors from the US government.

If Liberia had such a special relationship with the United States, Liberia would have visa waiver status today like European countries and some Asian countries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director of the Secretariat, Diaspora Liberia Emergency Response Task Force on the Ebola Crisis

Aftermath of war haunts Liberia, as Ebola puts pressure on broken families

By: Moses Owen Browne, Jr.

Moses Owen Browne Jr

Moses Owen Browne Jr

 

 

Lydia, 16, and her young siblings, Blessing, 11, Pauline, nine, and Paul, five can only watch, as the body of their mother is taken away in a plastic sheet by masked men resembling crop-sprayers, the standard way to dispose of Ebola victims.

Forty-five year old Juana did not die peacefully. She bled and vomited her way to death with no medical assistance, as she was being cared for by her children in an isolated hut in the small city of Voijama, northern Liberia.

But the fact that Juana’s four children are now orphans cannot solely be blamed on the deadly Ebola virus that, in the words of Liberia’s Defence Minister Brownie Samukai, is ‘devouring everything in its path’.

With no father around to step into the breach, the children have no close family to take care of them.

Liberia’s social problem of broken, single-parent families has existed since the end of the civil war in 2003 – and as the new virus claims its victims, this is now resulting in hundreds of orphaned children.

A total of 11 years of war produced a generation of psychologically-scarred men who missed out on school.

Traumatised, uneducated and unemployed, rejecting commitment, marriage and family values, the younger generation of Liberian men have become notorious for leaving their girlfriends to fend for themselves when they get pregnant.

In Bomi County near Monrovia, community workers estimate that 75% of women with children are single mothers who struggle to feed and send their children to school; and there are estimates that over half of Liberian women with children are single mothers.

“The large number of single-parent families in Liberia means that as mothers are dying from Ebola, the children lose their sole care-giver, and have no-one to look after them,” explains Koala Oumarou, Country Director for Plan Liberia.

“The orphaned children have to leave school, if they were in school in the first place, to try to make a living and support themselves.”

Juana was no exception. All her children had different fathers, and all of these men had abandoned her.

“We’ve not seen anyone as a father since we were born,” says Pauline.

Lydia agrees. “We have not seen any family member before our mother died; besides our grandmother,” she adds. “We’d be happy to have any relative or family member come to assist us.”

Ebola is a frightening, virulent disease and Liberia has been brought to its knees by the deadly virus, which has now reached nine counties and killed more than 1000 people.

Yet it was containable, and had it not been for Liberia’s weak health system, it seems likely that the epidemic could have been controlled.

But 11 years since the war, the country’s infrastructure was in the process of rehabilitation.

This meant that when the outbreak began, Liberia had only one doctor to treat nearly 100,000 people in a total population of 4.4 million people.

Illiteracy levels amongst the population are high and only compounded the problem.

At first, many people did not believe the virus was real, and it has taken weeks of rigorous radio, poster and brochure campaigns to convince them that Ebola is a dangerous threat.

Oumarou says: “With weak health systems and a fast spreading virus, this outbreak is one step ahead of the under resourced response to combat it.

“To combat the outbreak, actions are needed at different levels. Preventive work through public health promotion, care and treatment units, psychological care, information dissemination and rebuilding public health systems should be top of the list.”

Juana’s mother, Sonnie, 68, has offered to take care of Lydia and her brothers and sisters. But she worries about her age, because she is too old to work.

“I will find it difficult at my age to fully cater to these children, now that I am not working again,” she explains.

“I was one of many traditional midwives who the government forcefully retired, on the grounds that we were illiterate. I am also too old to do farm work or cleaning work.”

Now the children do not know what their future holds. In the past, Blessing, Pauline and Paul attended school, but they had to drop out after two years because Juana could no longer afford the fees.

Pauline says she would still like to go to school. I would love to be a teacher in the future like my mother once was, but with all this going on, becoming a teacher will not happen.”

Lydia was taking home economic courses at a technical vocational training centre in Lofa, where she was learning how to make clothes. Now she says she would like to try to go back to school, so that she can find a job to support her siblings and her own young baby.

“I have my own responsibilities, and now that of my little brother and sisters. I stopped school in the 2nd Grade, but I think it isn’t too late for me at age 16,” she explains.

For now, the family will depend on palm wine tapping to survive.

The children will also make palm oil and sell it on local markets so that they can buy food and pay their rent.

Tarnue Karbarr, Programme Unit Manager for Plan International in Lofa County, says support is desperately needed for the four children and the other orphans like them.

“We need some support for these children, like clothes, food and other shelter needs.

“This is the third set of children directly affected by Ebola in Voinjama and there are more and more of these stories and situations affecting the children here.”

 

Moses Owen Browne, Jr. is Media and Communications Coordinator of Plan International Liberia Country Office. He is also Global Youth Ambassador – A World at School United Nations Secretary General’s Global Education Initiative. Moses Browne is a well-known and household name in the Republic of Liberia, especially in the field of Communications and Advocacy for women and children, peace and security. He can be contacted Cell #: +231-886-493-370 and emails: [email protected], [email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fabulous life of Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook

By Clemente Ferrer Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan

 

 

Recently, Facebook declared its profits in the second quarter of 2014 with record earnings, meaning that Mark Zuckerberg (pictured) is one step away from being the world’s richest man.

The fortune of the founder of Facebook has a value of 33.100 billion, putting him at No. 16 in the ranking of the world’s billionaires published by Forbes magazine.

But how was the life of Zuckerberg at Harvard until he created the famous social network that today has more than two billion users?

A native of White Plains (New York), Zuckerberg used Atari BASIC to create a messaging program for his father at his dental clinic. A few years later he created a “streaming” music platform, in which AOL and Microsoft were interested, but they were rejected.

In 2002 Zuckerberg enrolled at Harvard University, where he gained notoriety for their skills in the world of new technologies. After his sophomore year, he decided to leave and focus on “The Facebook”, a platform in which until then he had worked from his bedroom. Before leaving, Zuckerberg met his wife, Priscilla Chan (pictured) on a family holiday. They were married on May 19, 2012.

In late 2005, Facebook surpassed 5.5 million users and received $ 12.7 million from Accel Partners. In 2010 Time Magazine named him “Person of the Year”. Vanity Fair also placed him at the top of the list of new companies and Forbes placed him at number 35 on the list of 400 most influential people. The May 18, 2012, Facebook went public.

In 2013 he was the most generous philanthropist, having donated half a billion dollars in shares of Facebook to Silicon Valley Community Foundation. He has also given a lot of money to Newark, the group of public schools in New Jersey.

But despite his vast fortune, Zuckerberg leads a modest life and usually spend some of his money in making the world.

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

Martina Johnson, Former Liberian NPFL Rebel Commander, Arrested And Indicted In Belgium For Alleged War Crimes And Crimes Against Humanity

By Hassan Bility and Civitas Maximas Martina Johnson

 

Martina Johnson, a former front line Commander of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) of Charles Taylor was arrested and indicted yesterday by a Belgian
Judge for her direct implication in alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity including mutilation and mass killing committed in Liberia during the civil war in
1992.

This landmark case marks the very first time an alleged Liberian perpetrator has
been criminally charged for crimes under international law committed in Liberia
during the first civil war. The investigation and arrest was possible under Belgian
law as Martina Johnson lives in Belgium.

Civitas Maxima has been working since 2012 with the Global Justice and Research
Project (GJRP) based in Monrovia to document crimes committed during the war and
find avenues for criminal accountability. On the basis of that documentation, Luc
Walleyn, lawyer in Belgium, wrote and filed a criminal complaint against Martina
Johnson on behalf of 3 Liberian victims in 2012.

These Liberian victims implicate Martina Johnson as having participated directly in
mutilation and mass killing in late 1992 during the “Operation Octopus”, an infamous
military offensive by the NPFL of Charles Taylor on the capital Monrovia that left
scores of civilians dead. Many civilians were targeted because of their affiliation
to certain ethnic groups including the Mandingos and the Krahns perceived as
antithetical to the NPFL’s interests.

Since the end of the civil war in 2003 the Liberian authorities made no effort to
investigate and prosecute crimes committed over a decade of civil war, which claimed
well over 150 000 lives, most of them civilians.

Hassan Bility, the Liberian-based Director of the GJRP commented: “This is a
significant day not only for the victims of the crimes addressed by this arrest, but
for the many victims of the war in Liberia, generally.”

He continued, “Despite the explicit recommendations of the Liberian Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in 2009 in favor of criminal accountability, next to
nothing has been done. We hope today’s action will serve as a spring board for more
criminal prosecutions on behalf of victims who have waited far too long for
justice.”

Alain Werner, Director of Civitas Maxima, noted: “Today’s arrest represents a huge
step forward for justice for the uncountable victims of Liberian’s vicious wars.
While the world, and the Liberian government, may have forgotten the atrocious
crimes committed during this period, the victims have not.»

Hassan Bility - Monrovia
[email protected]
00231 880580257

Civitas Maxima has been working in Monrovia since 2012 with the Global Justice and Research
Project (GJRP).

A COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACH TO END EBOLA IN FOUR MONTHS-

By Rufus Darkortey Economist Rufus Darkortey

 

 

A SYSTEMATIC HOUSE-TO-HOUSE SEARCH STRATEGY

 

1.0 Executive Summary

This proposal recommends a series of strategic approaches aimed at assisting the government of Liberia, countries that are severely affected by the Ebola virus, and collaborating entities to eradicate the virus within a period of four months. The proposal recommends that the government of Liberia must launch and implement a systematic house-to-house search strategy as a community based approach to eradicating the virus from the country within a timely manner. The objective of this strategy is to identify, isolate, contain, report, and monitor all incidence of Ebola at the community level to ensure the eradication of the disease from the country within the plan period.

 

Because the tracing of infected people and their contacts have become very difficult and highly impossible in Liberia, the virus is spreading exponentially. Since these challenges are driving the exponential rate at which the disease is spreading across the country, a house-to-house search mechanism becomes the best option to quickly eradicate the disease. This proposal also recommends that since the virus has become a threat to the national existence of Liberia, the government must exert every effort to take complete ownership of the fight and must fully finance the eradication of the disease irrespective of whether humanitarian assistance is received or not from friendly countries and organizations.

 

2.0 Introduction

The Ebola virus is spreading at a faster rate in Liberia more than other affected countries. On September 8, 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) indicated that the virus is spreading exponentially across the country. The President of Liberia, Madame Ellen Johnson Sirleaf has termed the spread of the virus a global health crisis and urges more international help. The Minister of Information of the country, Mr. Lewis Brown, has described the Ebola outbreak a serious threat to Liberia’s existence. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention projects the disease to infect about 20,000 people. The Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said this Ebola outbreak is the biggest ever known. H.E. Barack Obama, President of the United States have confirmed that the disease is out of control and spreading exponentially, thus ordering the deployment of 3,000 U.S military personnel in Liberia and other West Africans countries being hit by the virus.

 

Given the enormous rate at which the virus is spreading, Liberia and other severely affected countries must quickly adopt a more robust proactive crisis management approach to contain and eradicate the disease in a timely manner. I am therefore proposing this plan to help eradicate the virus from Liberia and the other affected countries within the next four months. This plan will complement the already existing reactionary approach currently being taken to fight the disease at the hospital level. Ebola must be fought, contained, and eradicated at the community level as a proactive approach. This approach will reduce or eliminate the pressure being put on the inadequate Ebola treatment centers and other medical facilities that are treating patients being infected at the community level. In simple terms, the community is the source of the virus and therefore all efforts must be made to eradicate it at that level.

 

Poverty is a key driver of the exponential spreading of the disease. For example, to date, most affluent individuals in Liberia have not been affected by the virus. Apart from Patrick Sawyer and the affluent medical practitioners who are at risk by fighting the disease, there are little to no deaths being reported among the well-offs in the country. However, about 1,307 impoverished Liberians have died from the disease and thousands more are being infected at a faster rate. A gap analysis of infection data between the poor and the well-off shows that, affluent Liberians are successfully fighting the disease because they are using affordable personal protective equipment (PPEs), while the impoverished individuals are not using those due to the lack of purchasing powers.

 

If implemented, this plan will help to eradicate Ebola from Liberia and other countries within the next four (4) months by proactively empowering impoverished communities to eradicate the virus before it reaches the hospitals.

 

3.0 Problem Statement

Liberia is hit the hardest of all countries that have ever been affected by the Ebola virus since it emerged in 1976 in Zaire. As of September 10, 2014, about 1,307 persons have died from the disease and more than 2,415 persons are infected. The disease entered Liberia from Guinea on March 22, 2014 and caused 129 deaths by July 26, 2014. From July 26, 2014 to September 10, 2014, the disease has exponentially spread across Liberia jumping by 913% from 129 to 1,307 deaths. The WHO is predicting the disease to continue to spread exponentially. Unless a plan such as this is implemented, the WHO approximation could be correct based on the analyses of the following factors:

 

3.1 Poverty – A Key Driver of Ebola

A major driver of the spread of the virus in Liberia is severe poverty. The country ranked the 4th poorest in the world in 2013 in terms of GDP per capita. According to the United Nations, about 83.9% (the 1st and worst in the world) of Liberia’s 4.3 million people live on less than $2.00 per day. Also, about 70-85% of the country’s workforce is unemployed. Additionally, most impoverished families in Liberia are often compelled to pull their resources together by living in clusters of about 10-15 persons per household, thus making it very easy for them to contract and spread the disease at a faster rate.

 

This dismal poverty statistics suggests that 3.6 million of the country’s 4.3 million people lack the income required to buy the necessary PPEs and other medical supplies needed to protect themselves from the disease. Therefore, they are highly vulnerable to contracting the disease and spreading it at an exponential rate as suggested by the WHO.

 

Because of Liberia’s vulnerability and the potential to spread the disease at an exponential rate, the government of the country must take drastic measures to eradicate the disease from the country within a timely manner. Consequently, this proposal is recommending that the government launch and implement a house-to-house search community based strategy to quickly identify, isolate, contain, report, and monitor all incidence of the virus within the community. The proposal is also calling on the government to take full ownership as well as completely financing the cost of the eradication of the disease. This means that the government must adequately supply each household with hand sanitizers, disposable hand gloves, Clorox, food, etc., and other items intended to protect people from contracting and spreading the disease.

 

 

3.2 The Closure of Hospitals & Clinics; Medical Misdiagnosis; Fear

The Closure of Hospitals & Clinics: Many hospitals within Liberia are either voluntarily closed or operating at low capacities due to the Ebola crisis. Most of these hospitals are indicating that they do not have the requisite medical supplies to help fight the disease. Therefore, they have opted to voluntarily close their doors for fear of being infected by the disease in the line of service. As a result, people that are suspected of contracting the disease are left with no choice but to return to their homes and in the process infecting others.

 

MSF and other credible medical organizations currently helping to fight the disease in Liberia have indicated that treatment centers are filling faster than expected, thus leaving no room to accommodate other infected people. As a result, people that are been tested positive are returning to their crowded homes, riding in crowded taxis or buses, and exponentially infecting others.

 

Medical Misdiagnosis: Due to the closure of many hospitals and clinics in Liberia resulting from this Ebola crisis, many Liberians are not getting the proper medical treatments that they would normally receive in the absence of this crisis. Prior to this Ebola crisis, Liberians were observed to incur many ailments, including malaria, cholera, fever, headaches, etc. Because these ailments share the same symptoms as the Ebola disease, many Liberians experiencing any ailment are now being misdiagnosed as Ebola patients and therefore being refused at most medical facilities. As a result, these people return to their homes and infect others if it turns out that they are truly infected with the virus. Because more than 3.6 million impoverished Liberians are being refused medical services, the Ebola virus is expected to spread exponentially due to infected individuals being left at home to be cared for by their families and communities without the medical expertise.

 

Fear: Ebola is being spread exponentially due to fear. Most impoverished Liberians that are ill are not seeking medical attention due to fear of being misdiagnosed or stigmatized as Ebola victims. Also, because the healthcare delivery system of the country has collapsed to a larger extent, there are no medical examinations available to quickly test patients for Ebola versus other ailments. As a result, family and community members are stepping up to provide support and care to their sick family members or friends, thus getting infected in the process. Additionally, many ill patients tend to hide their sickness for fear of being stigmatized or for other reasons. By the time their situation is brought to the community attention, that person has either died or has infected others exponentially.

 

The Ebola crisis has become a national security issue. Therefore, the government of Liberia must move as quickly as possible to subsidize the operation of some hospitals and clinics to build their capacities to help eradicate the disease. The government must also ensure that no one is turned away from any medical facility.

 

4.0 Plan Definition

The house-to-house search community based Ebola eradication plan is designed to foster clearly defined aggressive proactive strategies at the community level aimed at eradicating Ebola from Liberia and other affected countries within four months. The plan makes a key assumption that Ebola has become entrenched in many Liberian households and is spreading exponentially thus overwhelming the healthcare delivery system and other actors seeking to eradicate the disease. This plan shows that, with the rate at which the disease is spreading, fighting the virus at the hospital level alone is reactionary and lacks the ability to eradicate the virus from Liberia or the other severely affected countries in a timely manner.

 

Since the emergence of Ebola in Liberia on March 22, 2014, not much has been done to trace contacts and contain infected people. As a result, infected people have been moving across the country, thus spreading the disease exponentially. At this moment, it is completely difficult and highly impossible to trace infected contacts in the country. Ebola has moved into many impoverished Liberian households and is just waiting to attack the next victim during the 2-21 days incubation period.

 

Because of the difficulties in identifying which household is actually infected with the disease, the best approach is to go into each house and medically assess everyone and disinfect the house where possible to eradicate the disease from Liberia.

 

5.0 How does the Plan Eradicate Ebola in Four Months?

The Ebola virus requires a human host to survive, otherwise it dies. It spreads through contact with infected body fluids. According to experts, the incubation period of the virus is 2-21 days. So anyone who contracts the virus is expected to die or transmit it on or before the 21st day if not treated. The incubation period starts over for anyone who came in contact with the previously infected person for a total of 42 days (21+21). If a 3rd person got infected on the 21st day of the 2nd previously infected person, the total days count jumps to 63 days (21+21+21). As the trend continues, if 6 persons got infected at the end of each incubation period, the virus will be around for about 126 days (6*21) or approximately four (4) months (126/31).

 

Current estimates suggest that more than 50 new cases are being reported on a daily basis. So assuming those 50 persons also infected 50 more people at their terminal stages, about 1,050 days (50*21) or 34 months (1,050/31) could be added to the Ebola fight.

 

So, to eradicate the continue spread and prolongation of the disease as hypothetically shown above, the first person who contracts the disease must quickly be identified, isolated, contained, treated, and monitored for full recovery. This is how this disease can be eradicated from Liberia within four months. Under this plan, I expect the government to organize and deploy the necessary resources and essential supplies within the 1st 30 days or 1st month of the plan period. Once the resources are deployed, the community vigilante teams will begin the daily house-to-house searches on the first day of the 2nd month. The 2nd month begins to pay huge dividends as almost every infected person is identified, isolated, contained, and treated. During the 3rd month, the daily searches continue resulting into identifying additional individuals who may have gotten infected by people who were identified during the 1st month. By the 4th month, it will be difficult to identify new cases and all existing cases may be discharged from the hospitals at the end of the 4th month.

 

These scenarios show that the house-to-house search community based approach is the best strategy for eradicating the virus from Liberia. On the contrary, let’s assume that the current wait and see reactive approach continues at the hospital level, the hospitals will only treat people who show up at the hospital. So as people are getting exponentially infected, the hospitals will continue to run out of beds, rooms, personnel, resources, and other logistical support, thus prolonging the fight of the disease and thus crippling the country further.

 

I am therefore strongly encouraging the government of Liberia to quickly implement this plan.

 

6.0 Objective of the Plan

The overall objective of this plan is to eradicate Ebola from Liberia within four (4) months as of the date of implementation of the plan by the government of the country.

 

7.0 The Strategic Approaches of the Plan

This section outlines the strategic approaches of the plan. The related strategies of implementation and other supporting motivations are presented in the next sections of this document.

 

7.1 Strategy #1: Government Must Own and Finance the Cost of Fighting Ebola

7.2 Strategy #2: Elevate the Ebola Fight to the Community Level

7.3 Strategy #3: Uphold the State of Emergency for Four (4) Months

7.4 Strategy #4: Implement House-to-House Search and Monitoring Mechanism

7.5 Strategy #5: Recruit and Organize Community Structures

7.6 Strategy #6: Establish Zonal Managerial Structures

7.7 Strategy #7: Restrict Movements, Isolate, and Quarantine

7.8 Strategy #8: Supply each Household with Food

7.9 Strategy #9: Supply each Household with PPEs

7.1a Strategy #10: Subsidize the Operations of Key Medical Facilities

7.2a Strategy #11: Increase the Size of the Ebola Call Centers

7.3a Strategy #12: Mandate the Prompt Reporting of all Deaths and Ailments

7.4a Strategy #13: Commit Some Government Vehicles to Pick up Bodies and Sick People

 

8.0 Implementation Strategy

The eradication of Ebola from Liberia can only be assured with a clearly defined and properly executed aggressive strategy. The following are carefully researched strategies aimed at eradicating Ebola from Liberia within about four (4) months.

 

8.1 Strategy #1: Government Must Own and Finance the Cost of Fighting Ebola

Ebola is catastrophically impacting every sector of the Republic of Liberia. Therefore, the government of the country must quickly exert every effort to take complete and timely ownership of the Ebola crisis. Additionally, the government must make every effort to gather the necessary resources to finance the full cost of the Ebola fight ensuring the eradication of the disease from the country as soon as possible. Irrespective of the funding and other assistance being received, Liberia must make every effort to eradicate this disease as a national imperative. It is Liberia, not other countries that run the risk of collapsing if this disease is not eradicated within a timely manner. International help is welcomed and applauded, but Liberia must exert every effort to defeat this virus as an independent country.

 

The Ebola virus has become a clear and present danger to the national security of the country. According to the Ministers of Defense and Information of the country, the virus is a serious threat to Liberia’s existence. Since the virus entered the country about 7 months ago from March 22, 2014, the evidence clearly suggests that the virus has had serious catastrophic impact on every sector of the country. The economy is severely shocked. Almost all of the airlines operating within the country have canceled their flights. Shipping lines have also canceled their fleets. A number of domestic and international businesses, including non-profit and for-profit organizations have ceased their operations. The borders of the country are closed thus adversely affecting the import and export sector of the country creating the shortage of goods and services. The shortage and non-production of goods and services are driving higher prices of the remaining goods and services, thus imposing severe economic hardship on the already impoverished people of the country. The government has scaled down operations instructing nonessential staff to stay at home. The healthcare delivery system of the country has collapsed resulting from the voluntary closure of most hospitals and clinics operating within the country. The schools are closed and every other institution within the country is either closed or operating at a low capacity.

 

Unless the government of Liberia takes full ownership by financing the timely eradication of the disease from the country, the country is bound to collapse politically, economically, and socially within a few months to come.

 

Taking full ownership: We must firstly commend the government of Liberia for the level of work already performed at the moment to fight the disease. But given the exponential rate at which the virus is spreading across the country on a daily basis, the government must be required to do more by taking full ownership to bring this virus under control within the next four months.

 

It is currently observed that the fight against the disease is a voluntary one at some levels, mostly undertaken by some renowned local and international non-profit organization, churches, and other community based self-help initiatives. For example, The Médecins Sans Frontières, the United States based Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the Samaritan Purse, the World Health Organization, etc., are some of the organizations actively fighting the disease with little to no government presence in some areas. Currently, there are 3-6 days delays in picking up dead bodies. People who are sick are not getting urgent medical attention, thus leaving them to die prematurely. Some people that are being quarantined are not fed or medically treated, thus prompting them to run into the community to look for food, thus infecting others in the process. It is also reported by MSF and others that Ebola Treatment Centers are inadequate and filling faster, thus resulting into people who are Ebola positive to be turned away, which is leading to new cases.

 

We should welcome and embrace all international and local voluntary efforts to eradicate this virus. However, because of the catastrophic impact the disease has had on the entire country and the resulting national security threat it has on the existence of the country, the government must take full and complete ownership of eradicating this virus from the country. This country is an independent country and must exhibit every effort to independently lead the charge to defeat this virus even if there are no international or local help available. I am more than 100% convinced that our government has the financial capacity to defeat this virus in a timely manner.

 

Financing the cost of the Ebola fight: The government of Liberia must move quickly to finance the full cost of fighting the Ebola disease or risk dire consequences and repercussions for inadequate actions. Since the emergence of the virus seven months ago, the inadequate measures taken to contain and eradicate the disease have led to the exponential rate at which the disease is spreading across the country, thus threatening the national existence of the country. I would think any threat to our national existence will be coming through military actions from a superpower and not the Ebola virus. No country has collapsed as a result of the virus so Liberia must not allow herself to be the first. Ebola is a very deadly disease but can easily be contained and eradicated if and only if careful measures are utilized.

 

It is currently being observed that most communities, especially the impoverished ones are not being supplied with individualized hand sanitizers, disposable hand gloves, and other requisite PPEs that are necessary for the prevention of the spread of the disease. Most hospitals are voluntarily closed due to the lack of PPEs and other medical supplies that are necessary for the fight against the disease. Additionally, healthcare workers are refusing to work or are protesting to work due to the payment of salary arrears. The evidence also show that there are too many makeshift isolation centers around the country that are being undertaken by community efforts without any support from the government, thus exponentially increasing the infection and death rates of the Ebola victims.

 

A key concern being expressed by the government is that it does not have the monetary capacity to eradicate the disease, thus only funding US$5 million out of a $20 million initial allocation to fight the disease. Despite the recent shock to the economy of the country as a result of the 14 years civil war, I am confident that Liberia is capable of committing about US$200 million dollars to this fight, which is even too high to eradicate this virus if adequate measures are taken as quickly as possible.

 

On May 21, 2014, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf submitted a draft national budget of US$557 million to the 53rd National Legislature. The budget is expected to invest in key areas of national development with specific focus on roads, security, energy, technology, ports, health, education, etc. Given the dire national security threat the virus is posing to our national existence, the government must reprioritize the budget to shift funding away from the items mentioned above to completely fund the eradication of the disease from Liberia within the next four months as is being proposed. While we must be grateful and continue to embrace the impeccable humanitarian assistance we continue to enjoy from the donor community, Liberia, as an independent country of more than 167 years, must proudly exercise such independence by independently striving to eradicate Ebola from the country.

 

Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) of Government’s Inadequate vs. Adequate Actions: The current inadequate measures being taken by the government to defeat the virus could result into dire consequences for the country based on the following cost benefit analysis:

 

CBA of Inadequate Action: The current state of affairs of the country as a result of the Ebola virus suggests that Liberia is in a dire and dismal state. Liberia stands to suffer political and more socio-economic consequences as the virus continue to spread exponentially across the country. As indicated above, since the virus emerged in Liberia about seven months ago from March 22, 2014, it has significantly paralyzed the economy. Almost all of the international airlines operating within the country have cancelled their flights. Those that are still flying to Liberia are practically flying empty to the country. Most shipping lines have canceled their fleets as well. Many companies and nonprofit organizations have either closed or scaled down their operations within the country. International trade has been jeopardized from the combined impact of border closures and air and sea line closures. The supply of goods and services has fallen, thus driving higher prices for the remaining available goods and services on the market. The government of Liberia, a major employer of the country has scaled down its operations instructing nonessential staff to stay at home. The schools are closed. Most hospitals and clinics are voluntarily closed, thus causing other ailments and premature deaths to go on the rise. The fear of the virus has engulfed both local and international investors and others with interest to do business in Liberia. Once this trend continues for the next few months, the economy of the country could completely disintegrate.

 

Politically, the country could face enormous challenges if this virus is not defeated in a timely manner. Currently, there are some individuals calling for the resignation of President Sirleaf. I don’t agree and support the resignation of the President. I believe, whether an opposition or not, we should make that ultimate sacrifice at all times to nurture the growth of our democracy irrespective of the performance of a sitting government. Calling for the resignation of a president is a democratic right available to Liberians, but such right should be exercised as a last resort, rather than the first as often demonstrated by Liberians. However, given the economic and social paralyses mentioned above, the government could face enormous political challenges if this virus is not eradicated from Liberia in a timely manner.

 

CBA of Adequate Action: Liberia stands to obviously benefit from the timely eradication of this disease. The opposite of the economic and political challenges mentioned above are benefits that the country stand to enjoy with a timely eradication of the disease.

 

Therefore, it is in the best interest of the government of Liberia to establish profound ownership over the timely Ebola eradication process and to also strive to fully fund the process, irrespective of any international assistance.

 

7.2 Strategy #2: Elevate the Ebola Fight to the Community Level

The source of the spread of the disease is at the community level, so the virus must be eliminated at that level, instead of mostly treating people after they are infected. Prevention is the best approach to eradicating this disease.

 

The government of Liberia and other stakeholders must attack the Ebola virus at the community level as a proactive measure to efficiently eradicate the disease out of the country in a timely manner. As indicated above, Ebola has become entrenched within some Liberian households and it has become difficult or impossible to clearly determine which household has it or not. Therefore, every household within the country must be medically assessed, monitored, and disinfected, if possible.

 

7.3 Strategy #3: Uphold the State of Emergency for Four (4) Months

The government of Liberia must prudently uphold and extend the nationwide state of emergency only for the sole purpose of eradicating the disease within the plan period of four months. The goal of the state of emergency is to establish the seriousness about the disease among Liberians and to also eradicate the spread of the disease by reducing the movement of people as much as possible.

7.4 Strategy #4: Implement House-to-House Search and Monitoring Mechanism

Given the exponential rate at which the virus is spreading across the country, the government of Liberia must immediately launch a house-to-house search strategy to contain, isolate, and eradicate the disease. As indicated, the government has lost the ability to trace contacts and infected individuals. According to the CDC, WHO, MSF, and other experts that are currently fighting the disease in the country, tracing of infected persons and contacts have become very difficult and impossible. As a result, most infected people cannot be identified. Additionally, according to experts, the virus can only be eradicated in a timely manner if and only if victims are quickly identified, isolated, and treated.

 

Since the country and healthcare practitioners have lost the ability to trace infected people and contacts, it is now highly difficult to precisely forecast and plan treatment centers to hold and treat victims. According to the MSF, hospital beds are filling faster and infected people are being refused to return to their communities, thus infecting others. Given the inability of the country to trace infected people, it is now highly inefficient, ineffective, and costly to only focus on treating people at the hospital and treatment centers level as the main approach for eradicating the disease from the country. The house-to-house search approach is the only effective, efficient, and cost effective strategy that can eradicate this disease from Liberia and other critically effected countries in a timely manner.

 

The following are some measures that must be applied to ensure the successful implementation of the house-to-house search strategy:

 

A. The government of Liberia must establish community based vigilante teams to execute the searches. This measure is necessary because it is assumed that each community member has a better understanding of their communities.

B. These vigilante teams must be quickly trained in a manner to identify, report, isolate, and monitor each household within their communities ensuring that no incidence of Ebola is left unreported within the communities.

C. Each household within the community must be supplied with enough food and PPEs during the plan period of four months. The acquisition of food supplies and PPEs cannot be left as a voluntary effort by the households of these communities because voluntary efforts are not binding and most of these households are too poor to acquire these supplies by themselves. Government risks the continuous spread of the disease if they don’t supply these items.

D. Each household searched by the vigilante team must be accompanied by a medical practitioner and a police officer to ensure that everyone is prudently implementing the plan with mutual respect for all. The community or each household must be very supportive of this measure knowing that it is intended to help make the communities better by eradicating the Ebola disease from the country.

E. The search measure must be consistently applied every day for the period of four months. The searches should take place between 6pm to 10pm every night.

F. The search teams must be given digital thermometer to quickly check the body temperature of each member of the household. The search must be properly documented. If a sick person is identified, an ambulance must quickly be called in and the person taken to a designated testing center for proper diagnosis. If a dead person is found, the team should quickly order the Ebola burial team to quickly test the cause of death if applicable and dispose of the body if it is Ebola related.

G. If the search returns a severely ill person, a dead person, or someone showing significant symptoms of the virus, that person must be sent to the designated medical facility for proper testing and diagnosis, or removed for burial following the measures outlined above. Homes that fall within this category must immediately be evacuated, isolated, and disinfected if applicable. The remaining members of such households must be placed in isolation and tested and monitored for the Ebola incubation period of 21 days.

H. The team must thoroughly search each household within the community ensuring that every corner and around the house is searched since most infected and/or other ill people are hiding themselves from medical personnel so that they are not taken away for fear of being stigmatized, etc.

I. As indicated, this house-house strategy must be implemented every day for the entire plan period of four months. Failure to follow these measures as structured could lead to new cases of the virus which could prolong the timing of the eradication period.

 

7.5 Strategy #5: Recruit and Organize Community Structures

Recruitment-Healthcare Team: The government of Liberia and stakeholders must recruit and train as many personnel that could aid in the execution of the plan. These personnel will be given basic training in preventive measures, identification of patients, and assisting them to quickly seek medical treatment for Ebola or other ailments. Health workers that are not being utilized could potentially be suited for these assignments.

 

Recruitment-Community Based Vigilante Team: Since this plan is community based, the government should encourage the establishment of community based vigilante teams to assist with the house-to-house monitoring of patients, distribution and management of logistical support, and ensuring the timely and effective implementation of the plan. This segment is one of the most important aspects of the plan given that community members better understand their communities and activities that may be occurring there. Because of the size and nature of a particular community, the community members are well suited to effectively and efficiently implement the house-to-house search strategic approach at eradicating Ebola within the plan period.

 

It is also important here to call on the community members to also avail themselves to such a plan as a win-win strategy. Due to the resource constraints of the government and the enormity of the Ebola eradication efforts, community members that are expected to be recruited or those that are members of the community should place patriotism over financial or material rewards. Together, we must defeat this disease to reclaim our families, friends, community, country, and dignity as a people.

 

7.6 Strategy #6: Establish Zonal Managerial Structures

To ensure that the plan is effectively and efficiency executed in a timely manner, the country and/or severely affected areas must be divided into zones. Each zone must have its own personnel, logistics, treatment centers, and medical facilities that must report to the overall managerial team, which is National Ebola Taskforce.

 

7.7 Strategy #7: Restrict Movements, Isolate, and Quarantine

According to scientific research, Ebola can only spread through contacts. As infected people are allowed to freely move around, so does Ebola, thus culminating into the exponential spread of the disease in Liberia. Ebola can only be eradicated if infected as well as potentially infected areas are quickly identified, isolated or quarantine, and cured in a timely manner.

 

The government must ensure that the rights of people are respected and protected while ensuring that people or communities are only quarantined for the purposes of eradicating Ebola out of Liberia. Also, the people of Liberia must exercise due respect for the government and support it at this time to ensure that the deadly Ebola virus is eradicated from Liberia within the plan period.

 

As a result of the Ebola crisis, Liberia, as a country, is being directly and indirectly isolated and quarantined by its neighbors and other countries. Ivory Coast has closed its borders with Liberia. Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone have closed their borders with each other. Many international flights as well as shipping fleets have been canceled for Liberia. Many people have canceled their plans for visiting or doing business in Liberia. Most domestic and international companies have halted their operations in Liberia. People that are leaving Liberia are facing scrutiny and are isolated and quarantined in foreign countries. All of these measures are intended to stop the spread of the disease and it has worked so far for many people and countries. Therefore, the point is, Liberians and the Liberian government must embrace the notion of being isolated or quarantined during the plan period as a prudent way of eradicating the disease out of Liberia.

 

7.8 Strategy #8: Supply each Household with Food

The virus is spreading exponentially across the country because it is now very difficult and highly impossible to trace those infected and their contacts. The government has lost this aspect of the fight against the deadly virus. The ability to quickly identify, isolate, and treat infected individuals is one of the critical strategies for eradicating the virus out of the country in a timely manner. This strategy achieves the goal of managing the containment of the disease by managing the movements of infected individuals before they infect others. However, this strategy is vulnerable to failure due to the lack of adequate food supply available to most people, especially the impoverished people of the country.

 

To ensure the eradication of the virus from the country within the proposed plan period, the government must prudently utilize the imposition of the state of emergency to minimize the movement of people. This minimization strategy will quickly curtail the spread of the disease, thus eradicating the disease from the country. To ensure the effective, efficient, and successful application of this strategy, the government must adequately supply food to each individual within the country or within areas that are severely affected by the virus.

 

As costly as this strategy may seem, there seem to not be a better alternative due to the impossibility of tracing contacts and infected individuals. The virus has spread into many households of the country and has become entrenched due to the inadequate measures that were initially taken. Unfortunately, it has also become very difficult and highly impossible to determine which household has been infected or not until the victim shows up at a hospital, found severely sick or dead. Currently, most of the hospitals and treatment centers have run out of capacity to hold the exponential amount of persons being infected. As it stands, until the government can implement a house-to-house search strategy to identify, isolate, and treat infected individuals, the country will run out of spaces at the treatment centers to hold new cases of infected people.

 

Therefore, the government must manage the movement of people; provide adequate food supply to each household within the country or severely affected areas; and launch an effective and efficient house-to-house search strategy to eradicate the disease from the country within the proposed plan period.

 

7.9 Strategy #9: Supply each Household with PPEs

Because the virus has spread exponentially in the country, each individual is considered a prime suspect for spreading the disease. Therefore, the government of Liberia must supply each individual of each household with adequate supplies of portable hand sanitizers, Clorox, disposable gloves, face masks, etc. These supplies are expected to be used as frequently as possible during the plan period, with a frequency exceeding more than 30 usages per day. Therefore, the government must ensure that each person is adequately supplied with adequate portable PPEs during the four months period.

Although, the plan is encouraging the government to keep chlorinated buckets at public places for public use, it is highly recommended that the government provides each person with their individualized consignment of portable PPEs. Portable PPEs are effective at eradicating the disease because they are mobile and will travel with the individual, while the chlorinated buckets are ineffective because they are stationary and will remain stationary as the individual travels around. It is also important for people who receive these supplies to use them as recommended.

 

It is also important to note that the use of PPEs is the most important component to preventing and eradicating the disease. There is no alternative to this recommendation. Anything to the contrary is the prolongation of the disease in Liberia or anywhere.

 

7.1a Strategy #10: Subsidize the Operations of Key Medical Facilities

The spread of the disease is also being exacerbated by the closure of most medical facilities within the country. Because of the closure of these institutions that are deemed highly important to the eradication of the disease, most infected people are either choosing to stay at home, thus infecting others, or are going to seek some form of medical attention from ill-trained practitioners or “bush doctors”, thus infecting others and causing the disease to spread exponentially.

 

Additionally, due to the closure of these hospitals, many people are dying or suffering the effects of other non-Ebola related ailments due to misdiagnosis by medical and non-medical practitioners. The refusal to admit and the misdiagnosis of the late 16 years old Shaki Kamara, who was shot in the legs by the arm forces of Liberia and later bled to death, is a prime example of the misdiagnosis of patients that is resulting from the voluntary closure of medical facilities at this crucial time in the history of the country.

 

Due to the lack of resources and PPEs, most medical facilities have decided to voluntarily close down their operations unless the government of Liberia can subsidize their operations. The Ebola crisis has become a national security crisis of the country threatening its existence. Therefore, the government must immediately assess the criticality of some medical facilities to the Ebola eradication efforts and subsidize those facilities that are deemed necessary. Per the cost-benefit analysis performed earlier, the country faces enormous socio-economic and political disintegration if every effort is not made, including the subsidization of critical medical facilities, to eradicate the virus.

 

7.2a Strategy #11: Increase the Size of the Ebola Call Centers

To ensure that lives are quickly saved and the spread of the disease is contained by quickly removing dead bodies from the communities, the government must beef up the speed at which it is responding to calls from the communities. There are many complaints that people needing help are not getting through to the Ebola help lines. In some cases, dead bodies are being left in the street for about 3-6 days, thus prompting dogs to eat on them and later infect babies and others that are coming in contact with these dogs.

 

Therefore, I am recommending the government to increase the size of the Ebola Call Centers to about 2,000 to 5,000 telephone lines and help line representatives. I am appealing to all of the cell phone companies operating within the country, including Lone Star, Cellcom, Commium, etc., to donate the telephone lines and equipment to ensure that there is a rapid response to Ebola related calls for help. If these companies are not ready to make these donations, the government must finance the full cost of the operations of the call centers. As a reminder, given the national security threat to the existence of this country from the Ebola virus, the government must take full and swift responsibilities for the eradication of the virus from the country within a timely manner.

 

7.3a Strategy #12: Mandate the Prompt Reporting of all Deaths and Ailments

To contain and eradicate the exponential spread of the disease within a timely manner, the government must mandate the reporting of all deaths and ailments occurring within the country within this plan period. It is currently being observed that most people that are dying or that are experiencing severe ailments are not reporting these to the healthcare or requisite authorities. As a result, people that are infected with the virus are infecting others while been sick or when they pass. Additionally, some family members are still in the practice of burying their love ones, who may have died from the disease in some cases. According to medical experts, the probability of contracting the disease from anyone is higher during the late and terminal stages of the disease.

 

Therefore, to ensure that the disease is not being spread in this manner, the government of Liberia must mandate that all deaths and severe ailments must be reported to the government within 3 hours of the person dying, or the person being observed to be seriously ill. The mandate should also state that no one should touch the body of the dead person. Also, until otherwise applicable, anyone caring for a seriously ill person while the case is being reported must use PPE. Anyone failing to follow this mandate must be penalized appropriately according to the laws.

 

To ensure the successful application and compliance to this mandate, the government must designate a segment of the Ebola Call Center and must also set other logistical support aside, including ambulances or other vehicles to swiftly respond to these calls.

 

7.4a Strategy #13: Commit Some Government Vehicles to Pick up Bodies and Sick People

Due to the inadequacy of ambulances and the exponential rate at which the disease is spreading within the country, the government of Liberia must commit some of its fleet of vehicles to pick up dead bodies, sick people, as well as performing other duties that are relevant to the eradication of the disease from the country in a timely manner.

 

As indicated, this disease is threatening the national existence of the country so the government must do all it can to eradicate this disease within the plan period of four months.

 

Conclusion

Within just seven months since the Ebola virus emerged in Liberia on March 22, 2014, the disease is spreading unprecedentedly more than any other country that has been affected by the disease since it first emerged in 1976 in Zaire. More than 1,307 persons have died within the country. The WHO said the disease is spreading exponentially, why the government of Liberia has termed the disease as a serious threat to its national existence. The healthcare delivery system of the country has collapsed and the economy is severely shocked. Political challenges are emerging. The MSF has indicated that many of the Ebola Treatment Centers over capacity and infected people are being refused. The CDC has projected that unless something is done, the disease could infect more than 20,000 people in about 10 countries.

 

Therefore, to help eradicate this disease in a timely manner, I am proposing a community based Ebola eradication plan as a proactive strategy to eradicate the disease from Liberia and other affected countries within the next four months as of September 16, 2014. A key ingredient of the plan is for the government to mandate and enforce a house-to-house search strategy as a measure to identify, isolate, contain, and monitor any incidence of the virus at the community level before it reaches the hospitals. This plan is also calling on the government of the country or other affected countries to take full ownership as well as completely financing the full cost of the Ebola eradication efforts.

 

Rufus Darkortey is an Economist and President, Liberia Economic Development Initiative (LEDI). He can be reached at 216-577-3177 | [email protected] | www.ledinow.org

 

Ebola outbreak highlights Liberia’s crisis of development policy

By Ashoka Mukpo High Level Panel on Post 2015 Development Agenda

- AfricanArgumentsEditor

 

 

Before the 2011 presidential election in Liberia, I was relaxing on a beach in Monrovia when a man walked by wearing a t-shirt with a candidate’s face on it. We made eye contact, and I asked him, “Do you think he’s going to win?” Not skipping a beat, he smirked back at me and said, “You tell me, you are the ones who choose.”

Three years later, Liberia is in the midst of its worst crisis since fifteen years of brutal civil war came to an end a decade ago. Ebola cases are mounting, the health system is all but broken, and last week security units fired shots at people who were attempting to break a quarantine that had overnight been imposed on West Point, a neighborhood of over 75,000 people. A 15-year-old boy was killed in the tragic incident, sparking outrage and sadness in a country whose society has already been torn by the epidemic.

Hopefully, rich countries will soon pivot to a more proactive effort to save lives in West Africa, and the outbreak will be brought under control. Once the health crisis has settled down, however, it will be wise to admit that this calamity has been a crisis of Western-led “development” practices as much as it has of the fragility of African health care. In the early days of Ebola’s spread in Liberia, many refused to believe that it was real, dismissing the disease as a fabrication. This begs a crucial question: why were so many people unwilling to trust an elected government that repeatedly warned them of Ebola’s dangers?

On paper, Liberia seemed like a success story two months ago. Foreign investors had committed to spending nearly 20 billion dollars on extractive projects, Chinese companies were paving roads across the country, and the all-important GDP growth rate had been over 7 percent in six of the last ten years. As President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf told Katie Couric of Yahoo News, “This is the same leadership that led a country from being a failed state to one that had some of the most promising growth recorded in Africa.”

During my time in Liberia, I witnessed a much more complicated dynamic playing itself out. Most Liberians saw their government as deeply corrupt and unaccountable to its citizenry, particularly those at the low end of the social ladder. This was not a mythology spread by disgruntled malcontents; small business owners I know spoke of paying 10 percent kickbacks to government ministers for service contracts, and last year Human Rights Watch released a report detailing pervasive corruption in the country’s police force.

Liberia has always been a two-tiered system. In its early days, the descendants of slaves who were helped, and at times forced, by the American government to relocate to Africa lorded over the country’s indigenous peoples. Higher education, civil service posts, and well-paid jobs were restricted to ‘settler’ families, creating a dynamic of exclusion and patronage that culminated in a series of horrific wars in the 1990s. The post-war years were supposed to have represented a break with that past. The government of former World Bank economist Ellen Johnson Sirleaf promised to usher in a new egalitarian age, and foreign donors rushed to pour money into reconstruction and economic initiatives.

Somewhere along the way, old problems crept back into Liberian politics. Transparency International labeled the country the most corrupt on the planet, and an audit commissioned by an extractive watchdog agency exposed that nearly all its resource contracts were signed without following proper procedure. Civil society groups documented widespread abuse of legal loopholes in logging contracts, which were signed by high-level officials. This slide into poor governance occurred in the presence of nearly every NGO, aid agency, and donor on earth. Most of them seemed to Liberians to be looking the other way – carelessness that was often taken as complicity.

Meanwhile on the street, Liberians sat in the hot sun, hawking petty goods while aid workers and government officials drove to and from high-walled compounds in air-conditioned jeeps. Now, the social fabric in Liberia has been exposed as being deeply damaged. This damage cannot all be attributed to the wounds of war. The response to the Ebola outbreak by many Liberians has laid bare a troubling and widespread sentiment of cynicism towards the government. Sadly, Liberia’s poor have good cause to have adopted a mistrustful stance towards its elected representatives and the international community that backs them.

Despite the high growth rates achieved by the government, a close look reveals troubling policies that have made the lives of the poor seem like a low priority. Houses have been demolished on behalf of wealthy elites, communal forest land was handed out to foreign investors without local consultation, and the legislature has repeatedly refused to pass a ‘Decent Work Bill’ that would have set a minimum wage. In an effort to ‘beautify’ Monrovia, a ban on petty trading stalls was enacted, enforced by riot-gear clad police who could often be seen chasing market women through the city’s streets.

Across Liberia, a cancerous idea has taken root: “We are on our own.” Foreigners are often surprised to discover that President Johnson-Sirleaf is unpopular amongst many Liberians, despite her international accolades. Even more shocking is the discovery that Charles Taylor remains widely admired. A Liberian UN employee once claimed to me that if Taylor were to return to Liberia, he would receive “80 percent” of the vote in a special election. The reason? “People say Taylor shared the spoils.”

The long-term effects of the Ebola outbreak in Liberia are impossible to predict, but they are certain to be profound. Economic activity is grinding to a halt and the price of food has begun to climb. In a country where a large majority of the population lives on less than two dollars per day, an increase in food costs is a matter of overwhelming consequence. The great tragedy is that if Liberians had been more cooperative with government efforts to control Ebola’s spread in its early days, however haphazard those efforts may have been, the crisis would have been far less extreme. For the global development community, pointed self-reflection on why so many Liberians do not trust their government is an absolute necessity.

To begin, the top-down economic strategy that emphasized economic growth above all and which failed to consider the social context in which that growth was taking place has proved to be deeply flawed. Even if the outbreak had not exposed the social fractures that lay behind the country’s progress, grievances and mistrust bubbling in places like West Point would have eventually erupted. Development partners must do a better job of insisting that issues like corruption, disparate access to justice, land tenure, and housing rights rise to the top of the agenda. In addition, bottom-up accountability mechanisms that give average citizens a greater role in policing officials and determining how and where money is spent are desperately needed.

No amount of GDP growth or foreign investment is likely to produce a functioning, stable society without the perception that all its members are equally valued. While growth is important, the Ebola outbreak has showed that if it does not translate to a sense of inclusion, hard-earned progress can be undone nearly overnight. Nobody could have planned for Ebola, but for years the country’s partners stood mostly mute while frustration rose in the streets and the government became widely resented.

Liberia’s poor believe that the international community “chooses” their leaders, and then shrugs when those leaders treat them callously. In the aftermath of the ongoing Ebola tragedy it will be necessary to combat that view, and to ensure that development interventions are geared towards building trust between Liberians and their government, even if it means picking a fight with politicians.

Ashoka Mukpo worked in Liberia for the past three years with a civil society organization.

- AfricanArgumentsEditor

Sirleaf and her predecessors failed Liberia and the Liberian people

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Ellen_Johnson_Sirleaf-State_Department_2012-

 

 

There’s no time to turn our back on Liberia.

Even though news out of there is discouraging, Liberia cannot survive without Liberians saving Liberia from the Ebola virus, and that inefficient government.

We love Liberia but we cannot say the same thing about the current government. So far, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is the most unpopular president or individual in Liberia today.

That is because when bad and ineffective government of this kind is allowed to hang around after making such monumental blunder in the name of governing, the people often find themselves in a vicious cycle of poverty and eventual death.

Seriously, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf does not have any stamina and credibility left to govern Liberia right now.

For Madame Sirleaf, saving face and frustration is driving governance.

She lost all the goodwill that embraced her when she arrived on the political scene eight years ago, as the newly elected (female) president of a war-torn country.

The Doe and Taylor fatigue and the unmistakable rhetorical sound bites, which once propelled her to leap from being a political gadfly to the presidency and international stature, has since diminished.

Gone also is the “do no wrong” impression Liberians and some activists once had of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s image-consciousness, which led her to hire international image and public relations consultants to build her as this infallible, iron-fisted ‘heroine’ who is destined to rebuild Liberia into a prosperous, respected and civilized society.

Liberians heard and read those lies and fussed about them, and only hope that Ellen Johnson Sirleaf will be uncovered one day. She has since been uncovered as not up to the challenge of the job.

With no organized, committed and respected opposition in the Diaspora and in Liberia with a resounding message and the credibility to challenge Madame Sirleaf, (some of us did our best to expose this government in opinion writing and in public speeches), most Liberians just give up, until now.

The Ebola virus, as terrible as it is in terms of the human death toll and how much it has destroyed the Liberian people and the economy, has done what the Liberian opposition couldn’t do to Madame Sirleaf.

The Ebola virus exposed Ellen Johnson Sirleaf for the fraud she is, and the incompetence she has shown from day one.

The Executive Mansion and the president’s surrogates are good at the blame game; always blaming the Liberian people for not heeding her early warning that the Ebola virus was on the Liberian soil.

According to them, Liberians saw Sirleaf’s Ebola warning as a way to beg for international aid.

The Ebola virus is a public health and national security threat to the republic and the people of Liberia. Those threats shouldn’t play second fiddle to the public’s distrust of the Liberian government.

Madame Sirleaf is duty-bound to listen to the Liberian people, and should have put a laser-like focus on the Ebola threat by closing the borders immediately, declaring state of emergency (while respecting individual liberty), and should have deployed every available public health doctors and health workers, to combat the menacing virus.

If Liberians are to be quarantined, those individuals cannot and shouldn’t be treated like slaves and prisoners in their own community and country. At least, provide them with food. Don’t let them go hungry.

If the state of emergency disallows them to travel from one end of the city to the other to purchase food supplies, or to visit loved ones, the Liberian government should have put in place a food (rice) distribution and supply plan to feed those people who are comprised of young children, women, the elderly and disabled.

Because the Ebola virus, according to experts can be spread by touching a sick person, or by handling bodily fluids of an infected person, a crematorium should have being built immediately by the Liberian government to respectfully cremate the dead.

The slum and overpopulated community of West Point shouldn’t have been selected as an Ebola holding center.

And when residents of the community took to the streets to protest their poor treatment by the Liberian government, the Liberian Army led by President Sirleaf and defense minister Brownie Samukie, opened fire and killed teenager Shakie Kamara.

Where is justice in the unprovoked killing of this young man by the state? Knowing how the Liberian government operates in that broken, corrupt and micromanaged judicial system, the young man will never get justice

Watch my written words, nothing will come out of this tragedy. Justice will be delayed and denied. Or, a slap on the killer’s wrist will replace real justice.

In fact, had Liberia been a genuine democracy, Defense Minister Brownie Samukai would be fired and prosecuted; and President Sirleaf would be impeached or asked to resign for the senseless killing of this young man.

However, there is a lesson to be learned from this Ebola tragedy.

Disaster preparedness, emergency management and emergency health should be the priority of the Sirleaf administration, and future administrations. Funding and training our own specialty doctors and health workers must also be a priority, after Ebola.

US President Barack Obama announced in Atlanta on Tuesday that his administration is sending 3,000 troops and medical personnel to the region, to fight the Ebola virus. Mr. Obama also announced the establishment of a regional command and control center to be in Monrovia, and the building of 17 treatment centers with 100 beds each to contain or eradicate the virus.

The Liberian people and others in the region certainly appreciate the assistance from the US and other countries during this very critical period.

As one of the oldest independent countries in Africa, we have to learn to do for ourselves. Our leaders cannot continue to beg, beg and beg for assistance when they (historically) neglected their people and the healthcare system that is now under a global microscope.

These same leaders including Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, their relatives, friends and cronies are known to travel to foreign countries and foreign hospitals for their healthcare needs, when Liberian hospitals and clinics are neglected, and Liberian patients are left to perish.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and her predecessors failed Liberia and the Liberian people.

The Sirleaf administration and future administrations cannot afford to lead from behind and without a vision. Liberian presidents cannot lead by begging and playing catch-up, either.

We need bold, caring and visionary leaders.

 

 

 

It’s time for Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to resign, now!

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Ellen

 

 

When dogs are seen eating dead Ebola victims; when an Ebola victim laid dead on the bare ground and is being sprayed with disinfectant by “Ebola police,” and when an Ebola patient is seen running in the streets complaining of hunger, than folks, it is time for Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to resign. Immediately!

Why must dogs eat dead Ebola victims or any dead person, for that matter? And where is Madame Sirleaf who is head of the Ebola Task Force and her key lieutenants when the dogs ate the victims; and when the Ebola patient ran away from the Ebola center?

For God’s sake, treat the dead with respect, Ellen!

Where are the infected dogs, anyway? Are they quarantined as well, put to sleep, or running wild in the streets of Monrovia? Who are they going to eat or bite next?

Seeing a deplorable West Point in the news, and seeing those pictures with hungry people screaming and making their points for food is an embarrassment.

Where’s Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s heart? Where’s leadership?

What else must happen to Liberians before we realize that this tired, confused and incompetent leader – this old lady who fooled us to put her in the Executive Mansion is not ready to be President of Liberia, not even the first and second time she ran for the office of president.

Even as we await the end of her second term, it is not late to tell Sirleaf to leave quietly and give the country back to the Liberian people.

She can leave now (non-violently) and take her sons with her and whatever stolen wealth she and her grown sons, her sister and other family members got illegally from the Liberian people.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf must resign now.

Liberians, where is your courage?

What I don’t want is the military taking over, period. I want a democratic transition with Vice President Joseph Boakai (whether we like him or not) taking over from Sirleaf, to complete the bloodless transition and her term.

An Amos Sawyer out of country interim government is unacceptable.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf shouldn’t govern Liberia for another year because the country has gone downhill on her watch, and living conditions right now under her leadership is deplorable and fatal.

How can this lady claim to be in charge when she is a weak president, is arrogant, not listening, is out of touch, and failed miserably to lead?

Making matter worse is the curfew Madame Sirleaf imposed on the Liberian people to contain Ebola. When political decision of this kind is made to contain this public health threat, government must put in place food distribution networks, because hunger will be a problem as it is now when people are not allowed to move around to get food and other things they need.

The Ebola virus is no more a Lofa County and Monrovia problem, folks. Ebola reportedly is in Bong County, and is making its rounds to nearby counties and other faraway counties.

It is scary to know that the government of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf cannot garner the courage and get the expertise to contain the Ebola virus that came from neighboring countries. Those countries seemed to be doing better in containing Ebola than Liberia. Liberia is now leading in Ebola deaths.

If this administration cannot contain the Ebola virus, what else can Sirleaf and her Ministry of Health contain? Where is the disaster management policy in Liberia right now? Sea erosion is a problem in coastal Liberia right now as well. Any coastal or beach restoration policy?

Truth is, this is the toughest year to be a Liberian; and even shameful to know that Liberian politicians take leadership and governance lightly.

To these people, the definition of leadership is to steal, being paid comfortable salaries without working for it, being close to the center of political power, and having the luxuries of traveling and having all the good things in life, as your people live in abject poverty with no food to eat.

Sirleaf called herself firing government officials who are or were out of the country during the Ebola episode. Some of these individuals and her Governance chair Mr. Amos Sawyer are in the US for medical treatment.

Why the US, and not Liberia?

Had Amos Sawyer, the former activist and interim president worked hard to focus on healthcare in Liberia all these years when he was in the center of political power, he and his friends wouldn’t be in the United States seeking medical care in a foreign land. Now what becomes of those poor Liberians who cannot afford to travel to the US for medical care? Perish?

When these people engage in these dishonorable acts of not truly earning their paychecks and not providing services for their districts and people, Liberians in the Diaspora are left with the tasks of sending remittances to relatives and friends to makeup for the lack of leadership.

However, presidential and legislative selection process or any selection process of this kind is a dangerous model that can create distruption, chaos, paralysis and national leadership crisis, as we have seen over and over in our lifetime.

Just yesterday, a friend asked me to go with him to the airport to pick up a globetrotting member of the Liberian Legislature, who traveled to metro Atlanta to see his son. “Why is he not in Liberia during the Ebola crisis?” I asked him. No answer.

I declined to go with him to the airport, out of principle.

From what I know, this particular House member, Jefferson Karmo, who represents a district in Sinoe County, is missing in action most of the time during his tenure as a Representative. The guy basically lives out of the country as he claims to be representing his Sinoe County district.

This is one of the reasons some Liberians are coy about seeing Ellen Johnson Sirleaf go. They are unprincipled, dishonest and divided in their loyalty. They are unpatriotic, period.

“Why bother the “old ma” if my family member is getting his or her financial reward as a member of the Liberian Legislature?”

My friend is one of those people – like most Liberians who will stay mute when his or her relatives is doing well financially by being employed by government. Had it been a non-relative politician, he would have viciously criticized the person for not “providing leadership.”

It is time for Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to resign. She must resign right now. She however cannot resign if we are not united in our call for her immediate resignation.

Liberians, unite. Love your country, and do for country!

 

 

 

Facts matter in a discourse

Theodore HodgeBy James Kpanneh Doe

 

 

In my last article to this magazine, entitled “What Hodge Failed to Mention About Tipoteh’s Activities in Liberia”, published on August 29,2014 I provided answers to Theodore Hodge’s principal criticism where he charged that Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh has remained silent in the face of bad governance in Liberia. In his rebuttal to my article, rather than responding to the facts and deepening the discourse, writer Hodge acting on his usual impulses of opining and pontificating on every issue chose to expand the charges.

I provide a few excerpts from his article of August 30, 2014. In that article, he wrote: “…. It was the late great Dr. Martin Luther King who said, ‘In the end, we will remember the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.’ And so it is with Dr. Tipoteh. The silence from him is deafening. “We all recall that Dr. Tipoteh was one of those who vowed to seek freedom and justice for the downtrodden. He saw and pointed out everything wrong with the Tolbert administration. But strangely, he seemingly compromised his moral standards when he joined the ‘gravy train’ to work with Master Sergeant Doe’s military junta. Strange that anyone who found the ways of the Tolbert administration so repugnant and repulsive would go to work for a military junta without any complaints.

 

“Well, as the old saying goes, “You can fool some of the people all the time; you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.” It didn’t take too long for the people to realize that indeed he wasn’t the great freedom fighter fighting in the interest of the poor and heavy-burdened. He was only concerned about personal ambition. All that movement of justice for the people nonsense was a ploy to buy recognition and popularity.”

 

These are very provocative statements that would have been helpful to the debate if they had any shred of truth, but the real truth of the matter is that they are unfounded, as we clearly demonstrated in our last article by providing more than enough facts that Dr. Tipoteh has consistently been engaged, that he has not relented in his civic responsibilities, and his voice of elightment has not been made silent by any “gravy” writer Hodge claims he is supposedly receiving from the powers

that be. But despite the stubborn facts presented to disprove writer Hodge’s criticisms of Dr. Tipoteh, he has chosen to ignore these facts and evade the issues by engaging in what has now become a fishing expedition, throwing his ‘hook’ everywhere to find fault (fish) where none exists in order to justify the unsubstantiated charges. If his core thesis or argument of ‘deafening silence’ made any sense at all, we would not be wasting our time on these pages to respond. However, his counterfactual statements—mostly opinions—which the writer wants to pass as facts and have the readers to believe needs to be further examined and exposed for what it is. We briefly examine some of these in his latest response. When summarized, writer Hodge’s newest round of charges are as follows: That Dr. Tipoteh is driven by personal ambition and only about himself; that Dr. Tipoteh supported the PRC regime, benefitting from their “gravy train” even amidst escalating repression by the military junta; that Dr. Tipoteh supported Charles Taylor’s tyranny against the Liberian people; and last but not least, that Dr. Tipoteh is irrelevant in the eyes of writer Hodge because he has made no contribution to the struggle of democracy and change in Liberia.

A bit of historical perspective here is useful and we indulge your patience for a minute before addressing the charges. It is rather clear that the writer Hodge has joined a new chorus of critics of the Liberian Progressives of the 1970s and 1980s who he feels have not contributed to changes that took place in our country prior to the breakout of the civil carnage in 1989 that ravaged the country and its people. This charge would be valid were the evidence presented by him and his coterie of critics as to cause a rethinking of our position. However, this is not the case! When closely examined, the critics have directed most of their intellectual fire on the individual failings of most of the key players of that era, without considering the repressive environment in which they engaged in their advocacy. Moreover, what the critics have not noticed or glossed over, is that most of the young men and women who led this struggle for change and democracy were in their early 20’s and 30’s and took great risk to their lives and future careers at the time. This is not to sidestep or excuse some of their missteps, but to charge that they made no contribution whatsoever, rises to the height of sheer intellectual dishonesty.

For example, in September 1980, Dr. Tipoteh was threatened with execution, by the Head of State after he made a public statement calling upon the government to respect the basic human rights of all Liberians. The threat on his life was reported on the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) through Mr. Jeff Mutada, a Liberian government journalist. INSIDE LIBERIA (October – January 1983-1984) provided detailed information.

History has also recorded that it was after two weeks (March 28, 1979); MOJA announced its intentions at its Second Congress to challenge the Tolbert regime in the then scheduled 1983 national elections that President Tolbert was overthrown, not by MOJA, but by the PRC in a coup d’état. MOJA did not participate in the process of forming the PRC government. MOJA’s announced representation in the PRC government came through radio broadcast without prior consultation on who served under the PRC regime as cabinet ministers. Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh, then MOJA President and fellow MOJA leader, Dr. H. Boima Fahnbulleh, Jr., were appointed ministers of Planning and Economic Affairs and Education, respectively. The two MOJA ministers tried hard to work for the implementation of basic democratic policies, but the harder they tried; the greater became the threats to their lives.

 

Dr. Tipoteh served the Government from April 12, 1980 to August 16, 1981, when he resigned, citing his non-involvement in the making of key decisions and attempts at his physical elimination as reasons for his resignation.

Furthermore, MOJA’s Vice President Rev. Dr. Nya Kwiawon Taryor, a leader in the United Methodist Church was serving as Dean of the Gbarnga School of Theology in Liberia, when he was dismissed for his religious work among the poor people by the then United Methodist Bishop, Bennie Warner in 1978. Earlier that year, Rev. Dr. Taryor, who has a doctorate in Theology and another in Ministry, published a book entitled, Impact of African Tradition on African Christianity, which received high praises from both academia and the religious community.

The repercussion was non- stop! As trivial as this may sound, Dr. Fahnbulleh of MOJA was fined by the PRC government for not wearing a non-Liberian three-piece suit at a meeting with the Council members.

I am going through this exercise for the sole purpose of providing context, refreshing the memories of those who lived during this era and, significantly, sharing with some of our readers who were not born, or who were either young to get to know the facts; because there are some people in this world who for some reasons or another are bent on destroying a person they know nothing about. Similar tactics were used by detractors of the struggle for civil rights in the United States of America to discredit the late American patriot, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in the eyes of the eyes United States government, by labeling him communist. Such labeling is a most dangerous and well-known game played by mercenaries and not by patriots and people whose burning desire is the building of democratic institutions through which economic progress and social justice can flourish.

I could go on; but allow me to share with you the name of the late Defense Minister, Colonel Gray D. Allison. On the fateful day of August 31, 1984, Colonel Allison masterminded the terror on the University of Liberia campus, with the expectation that sufficient confusion would follow for him and his henchmen to take over the reins of government. Scores of students and university professors got hurt that day! It can be recalled that Dr. Amos Sawyer, Professor George Klay Kieh,Jr., and student leaders such as Ezekiel Pajibo, Alaric Tokpa, Siapha Blackie, etc. were arrested and sent to the notorious Belle Yallah maximum security prison on that fateful day. Colonel Allison did not stop at this; he pulled from his bag of his deadly tricks to come up with the weirdest and most ridiculous charges that MOJA intended to eliminate all church leaders including Tipoteh’s own beloved father, Rev. Samuel Togba Roberts who was a Methodist church leader. [As an aside, some critics have tried to mock the fact that Dr. Tipoteh is always singing religious songs at occasions. If they are not aware, Christianity didn’t just come to Dr. Tipoteh yesterday. He grew up in the Methodist church where his father was a well-known preacher. Besides, he is multi-dimensional and talented. Among others, he was a student leader while in High school at the College of West Africa (CWA), a versatile athlete who was Liberia’s champion for Lawn Tennis for nearly 15 unbroken years. He is a gifted poet, dancer, etc.].

Now, let’s examine the charges.

Tipoteh’s Personal Ambition

Shouldn’t’ all of us have ambitions or dreams? Where has it become a crime to dream? Or for that matter, where has it been a crime for holding on to one’s dreams? I have not heard nor seen such a place on this earth! It was once suggested that, “Dreams are what life is made of!” And the truth of the matter is history is not lacking in examples of men who attained status as the result of having big dreams. If it were not for dreams, individuals like Thomas A. Edison, George Washington Carver, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, Jr., Kwame Nkrumah, Bill Gates and many others would not have been able to make valuable contributions to humanity.

Had they abandoned their dreams, there wouldn’t have been discoveries that we enjoy today. What is so shallow and cheap about this ambition argument, is that the critics have failed to point out how Tipoteh has used his ambition or aspirations to trample on the ambitions or dreams of others. Even though writer Hodge sees nothing GOOD that Dr. Tipoteh has done throughout his entire life, there are hundreds of Liberians out there who would confidently say that if he did not carry the torch that those before him like Edward Blyden, Didwho Twe, H. Boima Fahnbulleh,Sr., etc. blazed, they would not be where they are today. Collectively, the role of the progressives in the 70s and 80s was indisputably critical to breaking the stranglehold on one-party oligarchic rule, freedom of speech, creating mass awareness, and striking a death blow at more than a century rule of the archaic and moribund Grand old True Whig Party (TWP).

The harassment of Tipoteh

Prejudice was directed at Dr. Tipoteh then Director-General of SUSUKUU, INC. At the time, SUSUKUU, INC., non-profit service cooperative, whose goals and objectives were to help poor people in helping themselves, and to assure that more Liberians get to know about their rights under the laws of Liberia, had a project in Putu Chiefdom, Grand Gedeh County. The project was a part of the parent organization – the Movement for Justice in Africa (MOJA) programs, which included farming, literacy, legal assistance, health, school construction, food processing, road construction, production of reading materials, installation of safe drinking water, wells, and the construction of recreation facilities.

The money that was to be generated from the sales would have been used to build schools, clinics, roads, and small factories, mainly for the people in Putu. Instead of applauding SUSUKUU and the people of Putu, they were attack by Government operatives.

When the project started in January 1978, former Justice Minister Oliver Bright, former Local Government Minister Samuel Hill, former True Whig Party General Secretary Robert Bright, Education Minister John Bernard Blamo, Grand Gedeh County Attorney David Swengbe, Grand Gedeh Senator Albert White, Grand Gedeh Representative Silas Rue and Grand Gedeh Superintendent John P. Beh, threatened, intimidated, harassed, and jailed some citizens of Putu with the intent of abandoning their self-help development project; instead, the Putu Development Corporation (PUDECO) stood firmed and challenged the authorities.

Somehow, Superintendent John P. Beh ordered the closing down of the Putu project in November that year (1979). This act led the people of Putu in many parts of the country to protest as well as filed their grievances with the Zwedru Circuit Court to prevent Superintendent Beh and his supporters from interfering with their self-help project. And while the Putu case was still in the Zwedru Executive Council, where the investigation was taking place, members of the National

Legislature made slanderous and prejudiced statements against the Executive Director of SUSUKUU, Dr. Tipoteh. Those Legislators indicated that Tipoteh is a Kru man; therefore, he must leave Grand Gedeh County and go work in Sinoe or Maryland (counties), where Kru people are plentiful. (Nya Kwiawon Taryor, Sr. (1985), Justice, Justice: A Cry Of My People)

On February 18, 1980, the West Africa magazine conducted a series of interviews, which involved President William R. Tolbert, Gabriel Baccus Matthews, Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh. The caption of the interview with Dr. Tipoteh reads: “Three Voices of Liberia – III, Mobilising the Masses: An interview with Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh, chairman of the Movement for Justice in Africa (MOJA).”

The introduction to the interview reads:

“Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh was in 1971 Professor of Economics and chairman of the Economics Facility at the University of Liberia, as well as director of the Liberian Economic Research Institute, also at the university. He was demoted to associate professor and dismissed as director of the Economic Research Institute “for political reasons” in 1972. He was dismissed from his 1971 position as budget advisor to the president in 1972, reinstated the same year, and finally dismissed in 1973. His chairmanship of the Economics Faculty was taken away in 1973 and he was also fired from the University. After faculty and student protest, he was reinstated in1974, but was dismissed again at the end of 1974. Since then, he has been working full-time for MOJA and Susukuu, Inc., while serving on the National Rice Commission and sometimes as acting chairman of the Liberian Electricity Corporation. He is described as “one of the handful of Liberian PhD’s in economics…who could be earning far more than he does…within the system”. He also happens to have been the national champion for the last 15 years – an activity he describes as “one of those petty-bourgeois things.”

Partial answers to some of the questions:

Q: What sort of work is MOJA doing now?

A: All our work has a consciousness-raising content in the first place. Secondly, it is characterized by mobilisation for engagement in socio-economic projects and participation in concrete political action against oppression and repression.

 

Q: What form does the latter take?

A: Demonstrations, work-related action like slowdowns, stoppages, militant action by workers, campaigning against the slave society laws (no land, no vote), and international solidarity. For consciousness-raising, the important part is being on the side of workers, farmers and students when they face their day-to-day problems. Confronting management, oppressive school officials, exploitative landlords and landowners, ruthless tax collectors, etc., all raise consciousness greatly. You can make plenty of speeches but without concrete action people won’t take you seriously. We have a sister organisation called Susu (susu meaning mobilising of financial resources by poor people for one of themselves at a time and kuu is a Kpelle word – the most meaning mobilization

of human resources by poor people as in everybody helping on one man’s farm before going on to the next. So the name “Susukuu” is symbolic of the work we do). Susukuu was formed in 1970 and incorporated in 1971. From 1971 it has kept a low-profile as a worker’s organisation, and acting as consultants for collective bargaining. It has also conducted intensive research on workers’ and farmers’ problems. Since most of MOJA people work in Susukuu as well, I can just say that we have acted as consultants to the workers of Lamco and Bong mines, Firestone agricultural and produce marketing workers, students, market women. We have helped in negotiations even more than any union.

The PRC and Calculated Attempts to Slander the Progressives

John G. Rancy is alleged to be the author of a letter based on a request from then Head of State Samuel K. Doe. In 1983, when Head of State Doe wanted to consolidate his power in order to move from a military leader to a civilian president; he consulted his close advisors regarding his plan. The Rancy Letter served as the blueprint for Doe’s civilian presidency.

The following recommendations were made to Head of State Samuel K. Doe:

 

1. Remove all known MOJA and PPP sympathizers from the public eye through re-assignment or dismissal from Government and private positions.

2. Re-establish diplomatic ties with the State of Israel.

3. Adopt a sharp stance in both the domestic and international arenas against Soviet policy.

4. Dissipate all domestic opposition through strategy if possible; crush with force if necessary.

 

When the famous “John Rancy Letter” was made public, John G. Rancy denied that he ever authored such a letter. However, all of the recommendations made in that letter, became a reality, later on.

Tipoteh’s Photo with Taylor

Again, Hodge is on a fishing expedition! Since he could not come up with credible defense against the facts I presented in my researched article; he had to let a PHOTO do the defense for him - “A picture is worth thousand words” deception! Well folks, the photo Hodge purposely displayed was taken at the closing of the Government’s Peace and Reconciliation Conference that was held in Virginia, Liberia on August 28, 2002. At the end of the Conference everyone hugged, shook hands with friends as well as foes as done in CIVILIZED settings.

Hodge showed the photo of Dr. Tipoteh and President Taylor, but did not explain the context in which the photo was shown. His intention here is to mislead the readers. It is like looking at a photo of an individual who appeared in a photo with the Devil (Lucifer), with a Holy Bible split into pieces on the table next to both of them. Can anybody look at the photo and say for certain what took place? The answer is NO! Let say from looking at the photo, I could conclude that the individual in the photo, destroyed the Bible because he has joined the Devil; while another person looking at the same photo could conclude that a bitter fight took place between the two, and Holy Bible got destroyed. These are reasonable answers; but they are correct, because they are mere assumptions and not the facts.

Clearly, one who has no facts to present in an argument usually behaves like a person drowning in a lake who will attempt to hold onto a leaf floating by.

Finally, on Tipoteh’s relevance, we leave that to historians to judge and not writer Hodge. Let me close with this interesting observation made by these scholars: Dr. Edward Lama Wonkeryor, Dr. Ella Forbes, Dr. James S. Guseh, and Dr. George Klay Kieh, Jr. from the book titled: American Democracy in Africa in the Twenty-First Century? The passage speaks of the Post-Cold War Period – 1980. It reads:

“…There is resistance to democratization and democracy from civilian authoritarian regimes in countries like Egypt, Cameroon, Kenya, Liberia, and Morocco. In these countries, systematic efforts have been and continue to be made to strangulate political pluralism, primarily by making it very difficult for opposition political parties to operate freely…” (p. 6)

 

It is abundantly clear that in the scheme of things, the Liberian or African problem is much bigger and cannot be reduced to personalities, even though leadership plays an important part in how we tackle the systemic problems of our fragile democracy that the scholars have noted above. We should not relent, however; in thoroughly scrutinizing our current and emerging leaders, but we should take care to be fair, objective, and ethical in our analysis. The burden is even greater for those who write as they command a platform that shapes public opinion, and this should not be abused.

I rest my case and would make this my final piece on this subject of a distinguished Liberian, Dr. Togba-Nah Tipoteh.

 

J. Kpanneh Doe can be reached at: [email protected]

Rethinking Liberia's healthcare delivery system

Francis W. Nyepon

Francis_Nyepon

The Ebola outbreak showed how vulnerable Liberia’s healthcare delivery system is.
It also proved how the health of the vast majority of Liberians remains in jeopardy, with many still suffering from diseases that are relatively simple to prevent or treat.
The virus also proved the urgent need for a modern healthcare delivery system. It
confirmed the challenges face by the Healthcare System,which makes it near
impossible to impact the lives of ordinary Liberians in a meaningful way.

The aim of this author is to begin a serious conversation about repairing; revamping
and overhauling Liberia’s healthcare system in the wake of the Ebola virus outbreak.
In spite of this failing, the outbreak can and should provide an outstanding
opportunity to improve the system in order to acquire better health outcome for
Liberia. Furthermore, the virus’ outbreak can provide the Sirleaf administration with
the ideal platform from which to spring into action and develop strategies to put
measures in place to avoid another epidemic.

By now, every Liberian recognizes that the challenges affecting Liberia’s healthcare
system are gigantic and bountiful. Most will also agree that stringent and sweeping
reform measures need to be put in place to fix the system. Liberia’s healthcare
system needs vision, direction and a roadmap to bring it in line with 21st century
practices and thinking, in order to achieve results. Liberia’s healthcare sector has
been neglected, mismanaged and disorganized in the face of substantial contributions
from donors and partners. Policies to combat serious health challenges have on the
one hand not rendered noticeable improvements in the lives of ordinary Liberians.
While on the other hand, barriers dealing with management and organization prevent
progress in meeting basic standards of care by lowering living standards, and in the
process fermenting inequality.

What is needed in Liberia at this critical junction, when so many Liberians have lost
their lives to this virus, is a comprehensive approach to delivering healthcare. It
is mandatory that Liberia overcome barriers to accessing affordable, standardized and
sustainable quality care for all 4.3 million Liberians. First, there is the need to
prioritize access to affordable care, and bring to bear tolerable resource management
upon the system with adequate policy formulation and strategic thinking to realize
and attain verifiable results. Second, the system needs to be endowed with skilled
caregivers, along with equipment and supplies so as to not hold development hostage.

Overall, the system needs to be modernized, using our limited resources, so that it
doesn’t prevent those with health issues from moving up the social ladder, and
prevent them from participating in making Liberia a dynamic and transformative
society. For example, impartial access to healthcare in Liberia has not been attained
by many because of class, social status and geography. Many times, Liberians have to
travel long distances or pay huge amounts of money to receive the most
basic healthcare. In the absence of accessibility, Liberians use pharmacies as clinics,
and many times they have to forego treatment because of cost, quality and location.

Additionally, there are several other challenges that need to be mentioned. First,
over the past 10 years, Liberia has not produced sufficient health workers at the
rate that the country requires. These challenges can be surmounted by maximizing
our resources at our medical and nursing schools. According to the World
Health Organization (WHO), Liberia has one physician for every 71,000 people
compare to one physician for every 10,000 persons in the sub-region. Second, the
majority of healthcare workers in Liberia are located in the Monrovia Metropolitan
Area where one half of the population resides; thereby, leaving the rest of the
country unattended to and vulnerable. This author believes that Liberia will not
develop technically, economically and socially without substantial improvements in
its healthcare sector.

At this point in time, the Sirleaf administration needs to initiate a number
of reforms to address the pressing problem of modernizing the country’s
health care delivery system. First and foremost, the administration should focus
on upgrading the entire healthcare infrastructure. This includes a thoughtful
and unbiased look at the Ministry of Health, local medical and nursing schools,
and County Hospitals and regional clinics, where the rubber meets the road. Who is to
say, as Liberians, we will not see improvements in our healthcare system if modest
investments were made by the Sirleaf administration in the institutions mentioned
above in two years? The aim here is the fact the the Sirleaf administration needs to
alleviate the health burden on the Liberian people. This can be done in two years.
And so, this author will urge the government of President Sirleaf to begin thinking
about providing all Liberians with universal healthcare coverage. This national
health coverage can be paid for by imposing a 1% tax on income or on high-end
consumer goods. In addition, this author is of the opinion that intensive training
for additional healthcare workers in nursing and ambulatory care and hospital
administration is needed in the next two years to insure all Liberians get access to
quality care, affordable service and improved health outcome.

A moral argument needs to be made by President Sirleaf calling upon all healthcare
workers who are currently underemployed or unemployed to return to the profession to
help develop Liberia. The President can also promise and insist that our national
health policy will tackle emerging and re-emerging priorities in the sector with the
primary aim of improving health outcomes and wellness for all. To make it attractive,
the President must maintain that such a policy will be accomplished first and
foremost by prioritizing safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and proper hygiene
to impact rural, peri-urban and urban communities. She must insist that a realistic
strategy be developed to deal with communicable disease transmission among all
segments of the population. And finally, she must demand specific strategies from the
Ministry of Health to strengthen national research systems in order to shape the
national health agenda, while asking health workers to make sacrifice in the national
interest.

As a final point, our educational system must join the fight. We must begin teaching
health again at elementary school level where children learned about personal health
and hygiene. Parents too can play a role. They can help their children learn about
wellness, and do the simple things like personal hygiene that we are currently being
forced to practice today because of the Ebola virus (like hand washing and proper
hygiene practices).

Liberia’s healthcare delivery system needs to be drastically improved if health
outcomes are to be improved to impact the daily lives of all Liberians. To
significantly reform Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System, this author believes that
an office of standards and compliance be created. Such an office should be
100% independent, and should include an inspectorate, an ombudsman and early
warning systems. This office should set standards for Liberia’s healthcare sector.
It should be a regulator with legal status, and should report directly to
the President and not the Minister of Health. The Minister of Health should not
be able to intervene with this office on any level, because, potentially, he or she
could protect or insulate people that are a problem; and that would indeed be
tantamount to conflict of interest. This office will not have any impact on our
healthcare delivery system if it becomes politically compromised.

Our Healthcare Delivery System functions badly because of poor service, mismanagement,
lack of adequate supplies and equipment, and the discouraging supervision of staff.
Another important area is public health expenditure, which almost always result in
bad outcomes due to the lack of accountabilityand mismanagement of funds and
facilities. Another important area which must be highlighted is the lack of autonomy
in Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System, especially with regard to requesting needed
equipment, supplies and staff. If Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System is to run
efficiently and become modernized, than authorities at facilities should have the
ultimate power to make real decisions over critical management issues such as hiring
and firing of staff or the purchasing of equipment and supplies, and not the
centralized system, which is the foundation of the current system.

Above all, the office of standards and compliance needs to be established with
international best practice regime to deal with health outcomes of Liberians
vis-à-vis geography, gender and age. Independent boards needs to be established to
have oversight responsibilities over facilities and institutions instead of the
Ministry of Health. Politically connected individuals need to be excluded from the
sector, because they would comprise the autonomy of such a board by paying
lip-service to critical issue in exchange for favor and remuneration. Today, all over
the world, Healthcare Delivery Systems are created with board of directors
that consists of members of the public. And these boards hold institutions and
their administrators accountable for effective service delivery. It makes a
huge difference in the efficiency of facilities management. Therefore, Liberia can be
no exception to such international best practice if reform is to come. The Sirleaf
administration should commit itself to addressing incompetence, mismanagement and
lackadaisical behavior in our healthcare delivery system. Liberia can do better and
develop a first-rate 21st century Healthcare Delivery System to improve the lives of
every Liberian so that each person gets equal opportunity to move up the national
social ladder and actively participate and contribute to making Liberia a
vibrant, transformed and modern society.
Francis Nyeponcan be reached at: [email protected]