Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for September, 2014

Rethinking Liberia’s healthcare delivery system

Francis W. Nyepon

Francis_Nyepon

The Ebola outbreak showed how vulnerable Liberia’s healthcare delivery system is.
It also proved how the health of the vast majority of Liberians remains in jeopardy, with many still suffering from diseases that are relatively simple to prevent or treat.
The virus also proved the urgent need for a modern healthcare delivery system. It
confirmed the challenges face by the Healthcare System,which makes it near
impossible to impact the lives of ordinary Liberians in a meaningful way.

The aim of this author is to begin a serious conversation about repairing; revamping
and overhauling Liberia’s healthcare system in the wake of the Ebola virus outbreak.
In spite of this failing, the outbreak can and should provide an outstanding
opportunity to improve the system in order to acquire better health outcome for
Liberia. Furthermore, the virus’ outbreak can provide the Sirleaf administration with
the ideal platform from which to spring into action and develop strategies to put
measures in place to avoid another epidemic.

By now, every Liberian recognizes that the challenges affecting Liberia’s healthcare
system are gigantic and bountiful. Most will also agree that stringent and sweeping
reform measures need to be put in place to fix the system. Liberia’s healthcare
system needs vision, direction and a roadmap to bring it in line with 21st century
practices and thinking, in order to achieve results. Liberia’s healthcare sector has
been neglected, mismanaged and disorganized in the face of substantial contributions
from donors and partners. Policies to combat serious health challenges have on the
one hand not rendered noticeable improvements in the lives of ordinary Liberians.
While on the other hand, barriers dealing with management and organization prevent
progress in meeting basic standards of care by lowering living standards, and in the
process fermenting inequality.

What is needed in Liberia at this critical junction, when so many Liberians have lost
their lives to this virus, is a comprehensive approach to delivering healthcare. It
is mandatory that Liberia overcome barriers to accessing affordable, standardized and
sustainable quality care for all 4.3 million Liberians. First, there is the need to
prioritize access to affordable care, and bring to bear tolerable resource management
upon the system with adequate policy formulation and strategic thinking to realize
and attain verifiable results. Second, the system needs to be endowed with skilled
caregivers, along with equipment and supplies so as to not hold development hostage.

Overall, the system needs to be modernized, using our limited resources, so that it
doesn’t prevent those with health issues from moving up the social ladder, and
prevent them from participating in making Liberia a dynamic and transformative
society. For example, impartial access to healthcare in Liberia has not been attained
by many because of class, social status and geography. Many times, Liberians have to
travel long distances or pay huge amounts of money to receive the most
basic healthcare. In the absence of accessibility, Liberians use pharmacies as clinics,
and many times they have to forego treatment because of cost, quality and location.

Additionally, there are several other challenges that need to be mentioned. First,
over the past 10 years, Liberia has not produced sufficient health workers at the
rate that the country requires. These challenges can be surmounted by maximizing
our resources at our medical and nursing schools. According to the World
Health Organization (WHO), Liberia has one physician for every 71,000 people
compare to one physician for every 10,000 persons in the sub-region. Second, the
majority of healthcare workers in Liberia are located in the Monrovia Metropolitan
Area where one half of the population resides; thereby, leaving the rest of the
country unattended to and vulnerable. This author believes that Liberia will not
develop technically, economically and socially without substantial improvements in
its healthcare sector.

At this point in time, the Sirleaf administration needs to initiate a number
of reforms to address the pressing problem of modernizing the country’s
health care delivery system. First and foremost, the administration should focus
on upgrading the entire healthcare infrastructure. This includes a thoughtful
and unbiased look at the Ministry of Health, local medical and nursing schools,
and County Hospitals and regional clinics, where the rubber meets the road. Who is to
say, as Liberians, we will not see improvements in our healthcare system if modest
investments were made by the Sirleaf administration in the institutions mentioned
above in two years? The aim here is the fact the the Sirleaf administration needs to
alleviate the health burden on the Liberian people. This can be done in two years.
And so, this author will urge the government of President Sirleaf to begin thinking
about providing all Liberians with universal healthcare coverage. This national
health coverage can be paid for by imposing a 1% tax on income or on high-end
consumer goods. In addition, this author is of the opinion that intensive training
for additional healthcare workers in nursing and ambulatory care and hospital
administration is needed in the next two years to insure all Liberians get access to
quality care, affordable service and improved health outcome.

A moral argument needs to be made by President Sirleaf calling upon all healthcare
workers who are currently underemployed or unemployed to return to the profession to
help develop Liberia. The President can also promise and insist that our national
health policy will tackle emerging and re-emerging priorities in the sector with the
primary aim of improving health outcomes and wellness for all. To make it attractive,
the President must maintain that such a policy will be accomplished first and
foremost by prioritizing safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and proper hygiene
to impact rural, peri-urban and urban communities. She must insist that a realistic
strategy be developed to deal with communicable disease transmission among all
segments of the population. And finally, she must demand specific strategies from the
Ministry of Health to strengthen national research systems in order to shape the
national health agenda, while asking health workers to make sacrifice in the national
interest.

As a final point, our educational system must join the fight. We must begin teaching
health again at elementary school level where children learned about personal health
and hygiene. Parents too can play a role. They can help their children learn about
wellness, and do the simple things like personal hygiene that we are currently being
forced to practice today because of the Ebola virus (like hand washing and proper
hygiene practices).

Liberia’s healthcare delivery system needs to be drastically improved if health
outcomes are to be improved to impact the daily lives of all Liberians. To
significantly reform Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System, this author believes that
an office of standards and compliance be created. Such an office should be
100% independent, and should include an inspectorate, an ombudsman and early
warning systems. This office should set standards for Liberia’s healthcare sector.
It should be a regulator with legal status, and should report directly to
the President and not the Minister of Health. The Minister of Health should not
be able to intervene with this office on any level, because, potentially, he or she
could protect or insulate people that are a problem; and that would indeed be
tantamount to conflict of interest. This office will not have any impact on our
healthcare delivery system if it becomes politically compromised.

Our Healthcare Delivery System functions badly because of poor service, mismanagement,
lack of adequate supplies and equipment, and the discouraging supervision of staff.
Another important area is public health expenditure, which almost always result in
bad outcomes due to the lack of accountabilityand mismanagement of funds and
facilities. Another important area which must be highlighted is the lack of autonomy
in Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System, especially with regard to requesting needed
equipment, supplies and staff. If Liberia’s Healthcare Delivery System is to run
efficiently and become modernized, than authorities at facilities should have the
ultimate power to make real decisions over critical management issues such as hiring
and firing of staff or the purchasing of equipment and supplies, and not the
centralized system, which is the foundation of the current system.

Above all, the office of standards and compliance needs to be established with
international best practice regime to deal with health outcomes of Liberians
vis-à-vis geography, gender and age. Independent boards needs to be established to
have oversight responsibilities over facilities and institutions instead of the
Ministry of Health. Politically connected individuals need to be excluded from the
sector, because they would comprise the autonomy of such a board by paying
lip-service to critical issue in exchange for favor and remuneration. Today, all over
the world, Healthcare Delivery Systems are created with board of directors
that consists of members of the public. And these boards hold institutions and
their administrators accountable for effective service delivery. It makes a
huge difference in the efficiency of facilities management. Therefore, Liberia can be
no exception to such international best practice if reform is to come. The Sirleaf
administration should commit itself to addressing incompetence, mismanagement and
lackadaisical behavior in our healthcare delivery system. Liberia can do better and
develop a first-rate 21st century Healthcare Delivery System to improve the lives of
every Liberian so that each person gets equal opportunity to move up the national
social ladder and actively participate and contribute to making Liberia a
vibrant, transformed and modern society.
Francis Nyeponcan be reached at: [email protected]

Ebola debate evoked personal attacks from some corners of the political spectrum

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

 

 

Before a Liberian who perhaps doesn’t like my politics told me to keep politics out of the Ebola crisis in Liberia, another Liberian attacked this web site for publishing an article about a recent meeting former interim president Amos Sawyer had in the US with his supporters.

According to the article’s author, attorney Fredrick Jayweh, Mr. Sawyer met with his followers on August 30, 2014 to form an interim government, which he believe is a treasonous act and a violation of the Liberian constitution, since the planning is being carried out on a foreign soil.

Interestingly, this is the same 1986 constitution Mr. Sawyer helped to draft when he chaired the National Constitution Commission during the administration of Samuel Kanyon Doe.

The shocking revelation that Mr. Sawyer met with his supporters to discuss the forming of an interim government drew swift reaction from his supporters who admitted that the meeting did occurred, but denied that it was about forming an interim government to replace Madam Sirleaf.

What followed next were insults and putdowns from a Sawyer follower regarding my alleged “role” in the article, which I did not write but published. I was insulted and ridiculed for publishing an article I had nothing to do with.

Of course, I fought back vigorously, which I am glad I was able to do to get the cyber bully off my back.

The other incident occurred when I questioned the silence of the anointed 2017 presidential candidates and opposition politicians, who seemed to be in hibernation since the Ebola virus hit Liberia.

Why shouldn’t I inject politics into the Ebola discussion when politics is the driving force behind the decisions Sirleaf has made since the deadly virus entered the country?

Even as we debate the politics of Ebola and the president’s weakness in fighting the virus, Sirleaf made a political decision when she once again told government workers to stay home another month, to avoid the spread of the disease.

So when an elected president struggles to contain or eradicate a deadly virus, and those who aspires to be President of Liberia sits at home or in foreign countries and not helping to find solution to this national dilemma; do we just smile, leave them alone, and pretend that everything is OK in Liberia?

“Where is the opposition leadership in Liberia right now?” I asked.

“Sungbeh, what do you expect the opposition leadership to do? There is no need to politicize the Ebola crisis, let us rally behind this administration collectively to fight and defeat this Ebola virus.”

“Why not politicize it?” I again asked.

“Who’s making the decisions, not the politicians? In times of national crisis, do you expect potential presidential candidates and opposition leaders to sit by supinely in foreign countries and don’t have a say? Oh, OK, as usual, we Liberians always expect our foreign-based seasonal politicians – the ones who wants to be president and run for that singular position only when it’s election time. We don’t expect them to show leadership in times like these. Again, sad!” I responded to the guy.

When a forum participant added that certain members of the national legislature even suggests that Ebola be outsourced, I wrote back.

“If those senators are brave enough to suggest that Ebola be outsourced because the government is incapable of handling the virus, are they brave enough to come out and ask Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to resign or risk impeachment? By suggesting that Ebola be outsourced also suggests a lack of confidence in the president’s leadership. How long can the suffering continue to uproot and destabilize the lives of the Liberian people? Where are the seasonal – paper-pushing out-of-country opposition leaders? Are they preparing press releases and awaiting 2017 to get out of their foreign comfort zones? Sad!”

The individuals’ narrow sentiments do not surprise me, and I cannot get them out of the way they think, either.

Even as I write this column, the guy who admonished me for politicizing Ebola is in the chat room daily politicizing Ebola – the same thing he advised me not to do.

I guess he and his colleagues can inject politics into the Ebola crisis in Liberia, but are having problem with me writing about the confusion and incompetence of their “old ma” Sirleaf, who has proven to be tired and worn out.

I understand. Attacks come with the territory of opinion writing.

It is not that I am constantly politicizing Ebola and not doing my part to help fight the Ebola virus. I have done my part in helping family and friends back home, which is a private matter I will not go further into.

I also joined others recently and invited experts during an Ebola Awareness part of a program I chaired in our metro Atlanta community, that shed light on the deadly virus.

However, in times of national crisis such as the Ebola crisis, we expect our leaders to lead, to have clarity, vision, and take charge by showing competence and compassion, and projecting a sense of confidence that the Liberian people are OK and safe in their hands.

We also expect our presidential candidates and opposition leaders to show strength, courage, leadership and competence during national crisis.

These individuals cannot continue to play ‘wait and see’ and hope that Ebola will go away, before they can join the president and others to help combat the threat that is killing our people and destabilizing our country.

This is not leadership. It is cowardice!

If the presidential candidates and the opposition leaders don’t want to join the president as a unified team to combat the Ebola threat, at least, they can present a practical and sensible plan – a way forward that they think can solve the problem that threatens our nation’s security.

In our Liberian case with the Ebola crisis, I personally have not heard a word or seen a plan from those prospective presidential candidates and opposition leaders, as to how they want to address the Ebola crisis.

As usual, these individuals who hardly have any practical plans for Liberia except that they want to be president, are awaiting 2017 and other election seasons to spring out of their foreign and domestic comfort zones to shamelessly run for the Liberian presidency, which they think is an entitlement.

When these Liberian politicians believe the presidency is an entitlement and are awaiting national elections to function and prove their worthiness to Liberia and the Liberian people, it is the duty of Liberians who are disappointed with their lack of courage and leadership to inject politics into the debate by questioning their hearts and their patriotism.

Let’s do everything in our power to fight the Ebola virus the way each and everyone of us can.

 

 

 

Ebola outbreak stirs anger in fragile Liberia

By James Harding Giahyue and Bate Felix of Reuters Ebola Liberia

MONROVIA/DAKAR (Reuters) - When a starving Ebola patient escaped from a treatment center in Monrovia and staggered through a crowded market in search of food, bystanders who scattered in his path voiced their anger not at him but at Liberia’s president.

To many in this impoverished West African country, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s government has not done enough to protect them from the deadly virus. Ebola has killed more than 1,000 people in Liberia since its arrival six months ago. Across West Africa, the death toll from the world’s worst Ebola outbreak has surpassed 1,900.

Panicked residents said the patient was the fifth to escape in recent weeks from the understaffed ELWA hospital. Dozens watched anxiously as workers in protective clothes bundled the struggling patient into a truck and drove him back.

“The patients are hungry, they are starving. No food, no water,” said one terrified woman in the crowd. “The government need to do more. Let Ellen Johnson Sirleaf do more!”

A Noble Peace Prize winner for her work on women’s rights, Johnson Sirleaf had made gradual progress before the epidemic in rebuilding Liberia after a 1989-2003 civil war.

She now seems destined, however, to spend the last two years of her presidency dealing with the fallout from Ebola.

Feted internationally since she became Africa’s first female head of state nine years ago, Johnson Sirleaf’s reputation at home has been dogged by a slow improvement in living standards. Some critics saying she is out of touch with poor Liberians.

The 75-year-old former World Bank official now faces mounting anger over her handling of Ebola. Her government has been denounced for causing food shortages by imposing quarantine on affected communities, while healthcare workers have walked out on strike after several of their colleagues died.

The president has also faced criticism for sending troops to quell protests in the ocean-front West Point slum of Monrovia. A 15-year-old boy was fatally shot after soldiers opened fire on a crowd trying to break out of a quarantine there.

Opponents have called for Johnson Sirleaf to resign, but her government has said it is doing everything possible, given the scant resources at its disposal.

“Care and attention should be given to helping people who need it the most and we can get into the politics later,” Information Minister Lewis Brown told Reuters. “We’re in a better position than we were several weeks ago in this fight.”

Johnson Sirleaf has taken bold steps. Declaring a state of national emergency last month, she closed schools to prevent them becoming breeding grounds for infection, and sent home all non-essential government staff.

But the disease is far outpacing efforts to control it. Medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) said this week a further 800 Ebola beds were needed in Monrovia alone, and it called for foreign military teams to be deployed.

“Localized unrest and public criticism of government failures look set to increase as the health situation worsens and the authorities fail to find adequate responses,” warned Roddy Barclay of consultancy Control Risks.

NO CLEAR STRATEGY

Tom Frieden, head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), warned this week after a visit to the region that the outbreak was gathering pace and threatened the stability of fragile West African nations.

Although the epidemic was detected deep in the forests of neighboring Guinea in March, Liberia now accounts for more than half the 1,900 people who have died from the virus, which has also struck Sierra Leone, Senegal and Nigeria.

“The government was not clear on how to engage the outbreak,” said Francis Colee, an environmentalist living in Monrovia, who said Liberia had reacted poorly compared with its neighbors. “The government’s response mechanism has been very disappointing.”

Liberia is not the only government to face criticism as health systems have buckled. In Sierra Leone, struggling to recover from its own 1991-2001 civil war, frustration has mounted at the government’s handling of the crisis. After strikes by healthcare workers, President Ernest Bai Koroma dismissed his health minister last month.

Johnson Sirleaf similarly sought to quell criticism by dismissing senior officials who failed to report for work.

For Barclay of Control Risk, recognition that the opposition cannot offer better alternatives due to Liberia’s weak institutions, meant popular anger was unlikely to bubble over.

“Despite causing significant turbulence, such trends are unlikely to destabilize government or fundamentally alter the balance of power,” he said.

A major challenge has been informing a poorly educated population about a disease which had never before struck in West Africa. Burial traditions of washing the dead by hand have fueled the spread of the highly contagious disease but with many citizens unable to read, education campaigns have been slow to reach their mark.

“People are still not aware of how the virus can spread,” Emmanuel Geayon, a university student. “The Ebola messages and awareness campaign are not in the vernacular.”

Campaigns have also been dogged by deeply engrained mistrust of the political elite. Rumors had circulated early in the outbreak that Ebola was a myth and politicians were poisoning wells in Monrovia to win access to more aid money.

On the muddy streets of rain-soaked Monrovia, billboards now proclaim “Ebola is Real”. On the radio, songs describe the symptoms of the disease and how to avoid infection.

The World Health Organization has warned that up to 20,000 people may be affected before the outbreak ends. It has laid out a $490 million roadmap for tackling the outbreak but support from foreign donors has been slow to arrive.

“In a way, we feel saddened by the response,” Johnson Sirleaf told CNN in an interview.

The president has admitted that Liberia - which had only 50 doctors for its 4.5 million people on the eve of the outbreak - does not have the resources to cope.

Even in hospitals in Monrovia, a scarcity of gloves and protective clothing has put doctors at risk when treating patients - and in rural clinics resources are even scarcer. Several top emergency doctors have died in their duties.

Johnson Sirleaf apologized last month for the high death toll among healthcare workers, and pledged more money for ambulances and new treatment centers.

But the suspension of flights by international airlines and the closure of borders by neighboring states has complicated efforts to respond.

“How do we get in the kinds of supplies that we need? How do we get experts to come to our country? Is that African solidarity?” Information Minister Brown asked.

(Additional Reporting by Emma Farge; Writing by Bate Felix and Daniel Flynn; editing by Janet McBride)

Thinking outside the box

By Siahyonkron Nyanseor thinking outside the box

 

 

Why the complete takeover of our country, land and resources by foreigners? Is this the 21st century way of re-colonization? What is going on here? Is Liberia for sale? Do you mean foreigners have more concern and passion for our country than those of us who own the country?

Check this out!

Currently, there are nine banks in Liberia, seven of them are owned by Nigerians. Of the 15 blocks of oil wells, it is said that a single Nigerian owns 3 of them. Other Nigerians may even own some more. Nigerians are planting rubber in other parts of the country. Who did they acquire the land from? Former Nigerian President, General Olusegun Obasanjo owns a big poultry farm in Liberia. The Liberian Army was once run by the Nigerians. I am not saying we should not allow our fellow Africans to invest in our country but the complete takeover of our economy and national security is beyond imagination. I thank God; I am only a Temple University grad. The Owl is too smart to engage in such ‘Colonized Mentality.’ My education taught me to think outside the box.

A colleague once wrote: “Mrs. Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf took over since 2005. Critics and supporters in contemporary Liberian politics have been analyzing her presidency. As there is no secret as to what is obtaining in her administration, I will humbly reserve and defer my comments to posterity.” Unlike my colleague, I will do mine now; no disrespect. Too many damages are being done now, and I won’t be obeying God if I defer my critique. God commands us to speak truth to power. And being a journalist - who seeks to report the truth, it is a responsibility I do not take lightly.

Too many things happened to me because of my belief and advocacy. For example, my father and mother died and I couldn’t go to Liberia to have them buried. When my mother was sick she instructed my sister Jugbeh Menia Nyanseor that should the Lord call her to Glory, I should send my junior brother Sarkpah F. Nyanseor instead of coming to Liberia for her funeral - all due to my activism in the US against the ills of the Liberian society.

It is every child’s dream to be present when his or her parents are sick to care for them, and when they are dead, to be there to bury them. I was cheated of all of this because I chose to speak truth to power. Oh, how I wish I had been home to bury my parents! Since 1981, I have not been to Liberia. My father died in 1981 right after I flew from Liberia when the Doe regime pursuedTipoteh and his associates. My mother died in 1989. For this and many reasons, I am in the struggle till the end. This struggle has many facets including understanding and appreciating who we are as Liberians and Africans, and not always looking elsewhere for answers to our problems.

Decolonization of the Mind

Africans are so fascinated with education. They become intoxicated appearing educated, and they copied everything American and European; even the worst things too. A classic example is the British tradition of writing their position statement as “White Paper.” At one time, I served on a committee responsible to draft the final position statement after everyone has submitted their written contribution to me.

One of the members sent me his contribution titled: “A White Paper: Our Position Statement Regarding the Justice System in Liberia.” His contribution was great, but I had problem with the title, so I suggested we change the title to read: “A Brown or Color Paper: Our Position Statement Regarding the Justice System in Liberia.” When he got my suggestion, he was furious and his initial reaction was “Where did you get the idea of ‘Brown or Color Paper?’ It has never been done.” I responded to his question with the statement - because it was never done, that’s all the reason we should do it and start our own tradition. It did not register!

Like I always do in situation like this, I went on say to him “have you ever thought about why the British named their position statement White Paper? What is their skin color?” Since they are white, don’t you think that’s the reason they named their statement “White Paper? Don’t you think is about time we start our own tradition? Since we are not white, I don’t see why we should practice a tradition that we are not a part of. This is my point! We do not value our own culture because our minds are contaminated with the belief that ours is not valuable. And because we are brainwashed to believe we are from the so-called Dark Continent, we buy into their LIES. The position statement was written with neither topic. But whenever I write my position statement, I will title it: “A Brown/Color Paper: Decolonization the Mind of My Liberian Brethren.”

I have never heard nor seen anything like what is going on in Liberia where a president takes pleasure in mortgaging her country to foreigners, with no regrets whatsoever. I have never seen anything like the way the Unity Party government of President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is giving away our country to foreign interests with no consideration for Liberians, and is doing so with the blessings of the Legislature. Even the True Whig Party (TWP) where she served as understudy never did such a thing! Yet, the Legislature pose no challenge, instead, they are only concern with the amount of money appropriated in the National budget for their offices. How foolish can they be? Selling your birthright for mere “chicken feed” (thousands’ of dollars) is something I cannot imagine. Even President Tubman was not that bad off! Dr. Zumo’s reaction is appropriate here: “We are in for a fix if we do not think outside the box and begin to do something concrete about our plight in that country.”

But then I realize how difficult it would be due to our colonial divide, the artificial boundaries that divide us into camps - Anglo-phone, Franco-phone countries – with no consideration for our linguistic groups (tribes). Due to this divide, Africans see themselves through these foreign cultural lenses, at the expense and disadvantage of their own rich African cultures. With ‘flag independence’, we still behave like Kofi Appiah in the classic Ghanaian movie, “Love Brewed in the African Pot” (1981).

This belief is best explained in the book by the Tunisian- born prolific writer, Albert Memmi, titled: ‘The Colonizer and the Colonized.’ The book was written in 1965. It explained the role European churches and their partners – the colonizers played in imposing European culture and religious hegemony on Africans, and designated our cultures and way of life as inferior. We bought into it like Kofi Appiah in “Love Brewed in the African Pot.” This story reminds me of the novel, “Things Fall Apart” by the late Prof. Chinua Achebe.

In “Love Brewed in the African Pot”, the Appiah family is typical of the new Ghanaian middle class, whose members are living well, exhibit the behavior traditions of their departed white colonial masters. While in Memmi’s book, The Colonizer and the Colonized, the chapter titled: “Mythical portrait of the colonized”, Memmi talked about similar experience. According to him, he said:

“…Let us imagine, for the sake of this portrait and accusation, the often-cited trait of laziness. It seems to receive unanimous approval of colonizers from Liberia (emphasis is mine) to Laos, via the Maghreb. It is easy to see to what extent this description is useful. It occupies an important place in the dialectics exalting the colonizer and humbling the colonized. Furthermore, it is economically fruitful.

“Nothing could better justify the colonizer’s privileged position than his industry, and nothing could justify the colonized’s destitution than his indolence. The mythical portrait of the colonized therefore includes an unbelievable laziness, and that of the colonizer, a virtuous taste for action. At the same time the colonizer suggests that employing colonized is not very profitable, thereby authorizing his unreasonable wages.” (p. 79)

The European Christian Church

On the other hand, he added, “…The relations between the church (Catholic or Protestant) and colonialism are more complex than is heard among thinkers of the left. To be sure, the church has greatly assisted the colonialist; backing his ventures, helping his conscience, contributing to the acceptance of colonization-even by the colonized… But when colonialism proved to be deadly, damaging scheme, the church washed its hands of it everywhere. …The colonialist rewarded the church for its assistance by granting it substantial privileges-land, subsidies and adequate place for its role in the colony”. (p. 72)

Today, the church plays a similar role between the ruler and the ruled. For example, the ‘Christian Church’ in Liberia has remained too silent these 8 years – allowing the ruler (government) to mortgage the people’s minerals, natural resources and land to foreign companies for chicken feed; engages in corrupt practices, violates the constitution, human and civil rights of the ruled with impunity. Instead of leading the way to speak and fight against the government’s policies, the church adhered to the practice of – ‘separation of church and state’ and looks to the West for redemption, when the West itself is badly in need of both moral and spiritual redemption. Yet, we Africans continue to take our cues from them, whether they are good, bad or ugly.

While it will not be fair to blame one individual or group, it is fair to say many of us played some role or the other in the destruction of our country. We did so through active or inactive participation. The active participants are those that made all sorts of excuses for the leaders and failure of the government, and played it safe – sit by and did not speak truth to power; whereas, the inactive participants consisted of individuals or groups that considered those of us that write and speak truth to power as “Troublemakers” and ask us to leave the “People’s thing alone.” Either way, many of us had some part to play in what happened and is happening right this moment in our country like the Ebola crisis.

For God’s sake, wake up Liberians, speak up and do something. The settlers came from North America, took possession of the land God ordained for us to share; they illegally drafted a fiasco land sale deed, and now President Sirleaf is completing the scheme - giving the people’s land away like it is nobody’s business, and the legislature, majority of them are fighting over who gets

what for their office in the national budget. This is the same group who yesterday was criticizing the TWP leaders. How naive can they be?

Greed and Stupidity

This reminds me of another story that involved a humble lady and her mean and greedy husband. He was so mean and greedy; he had his wife to enter into an agreement with him so that when he dies, the wife would bury ALL of his money with him in the grave. The humble wife was practically forced to sign the agreement; they had it notarized. It reads: “When I die, you (the wife) agreed to bury ALL of my money with me in my grave.” After she entered the contract with her husband, she told her friends and relatives about the agreement she signed with her sick husband. Upon hearing it, her friends and relatives called her all sorts of names - naïve, silly and downright STUPID.

Two and a half years after the agreement was executed, Mr. Charlie S. Buggar, Sr. died. Once again, the friends and relatives told Mrs. Buggar not to follow through with the agreement since he had died. She refused, and said to them that it was an agreement done with her husband in “good faith” when he was alive; and that she could not go back on her words. “My words are my bond”, she said. You can imagine what they (her friends and relatives) must have said behind her back!

On the day of the funeral, Mrs. Buggar got her husband’s “BIGGIEST Suitcase”; she marked it with the inscription that reads: “My Husband’s Earthly Possession for the life Beyond”. She placed his money inside the BIG Suitcase to be buried along with him. And they did just that; buried him with ALL of his money!

After the funeral, the press described the incident as wonderful. “A wife buried her husband in the fashion of an Egyptian Pharaoh.” On that day, it was the lead story in ALL of the newspapers in that town. The newspaper sold out! But at the repass, the wife told her friends and relatives that she buried her husband with ALL of his money. “I wrote him a CHECK that reads, pay to the order of Charlie Stupid Buggar, Sr.; signed, Mary Wise Buggar. She added, “The reason I placed the CHECK in the BIG Suitcase was to throw the people at the funeral off, include you (friends and relatives)”. At this point, her friends and relatives burst into jubilation and laughter. They laughed so hard, they shared tears.

The moral of the story is, never tell all of your plans to friends and relatives, because they might likely mislead you. But there is one person in whom you can TRUST that will NOT mislead you, and that person is the Almighty God!

Liberian people, there is a parable that says, if the townspeople are happy, look for the chief; if they are not happy, look for the chief. In short, since “God can’t sleep” as we say in Liberia, God is ready to deal with the President, the Unity Party officials, all those that have been participating in rampant corruption; their DAY OF JUDGMENT IS AT HAND!

 

Source

Memmi, Albert (1967). The Colonizer and the Colonized. Boston: Beacon Press.

 

 

About The Author: Siahyonkron Nyanseor is the Chair of the ULAA Council of Eminent Persons (UCEP), Inc. He is a poet, Griot, journalist, and a cultural and political activist. In

2012, he Co-authored Djogbachiachuwa: The Liberian Literature Anthology; his book of poems: TIPOSAH: Message from the Palava Hut is now on the market. Nyanseor can be reach at: [email protected].

 

Online media, new target of venture capitalists

By Clemente Ferrer BuzzFeed and venture capitalists

 

 

Though abundant pessimism about the future of journalism, the American media prove that newsrooms are filled with young talent, so that venture capitalists have decided to give a chance to publishers investing millions with them. The online media are the new target of venture capitalists.

BuzzFeed has gotten $ 46 million financing, Vox Media has raised about $ 80 million in venture capital and Business Insider has gotten around 30 million. This turnaround in the media not only reflects a renewed confidence in the publications, but also shows that online media are increasingly perceived as profitable companies in the world of new technologies.

However, even those venture capitalists that are increasing their participation in the media, are divided on whether this funding demonstrates a twist or just a moment of optimism in the market. Risk investors that are willing to support publishers seek a pattern for the most suitable companies.

Recent investments in publishing are not a sign of enthusiasm about the sector but rather a sign that the publishing world is in a less bad situation than it should be. “Things are not getting better, just being less bad”.

What is clear is that the Internet offers many new opportunities. The audiences are fragmented, allowing advertisers to identify and deliver specialized content. A clear example of what is stated above is ‘The Dodo’, a website that was launched late last year with news relating to the animal world, which has been a success. Specializing in online media is a guarantee to avoid failure.

Moreover, the Internet ad spending will continue to grow in the coming years in the United States, reaching 25.6% more in 2015, according to an eMarketer study (Source: Marketing directo).

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing. [email protected].

 

Amos Sawyer and followers met recently in US and discussed forming an interim government to replace Ellen Johnson Sirleaf

By Frederick A.B. Jayweh Amos Sawyer

 

 

 

Friends of Liberians,

Mr. Amos C. Sawyer (PhD), on Saturday, August 30, 2014, conducted a highly spirited “Progressive’s” teleconference in the USA. We are told that all the diehard Progressives and Neo-Progressives were presented and congregated. What did Mr. Amos C. Sawyer tell his followers and what he didn’t say, speaks volume. The Progressives and Neo-Progressives of the 1970s and 1980s, all along, wanted and deeply desired to have power most exceptionally. To get power at all cost, they intentionally deceived, manipulated, and misled the Liberian People and the world into the 1989 war.

Today, the 70s and 80s Progressives have power and immensely ill-gotten wealth to themselves. Liberians, just see what they have done with power, and what power has done to them. Today, Mr. Sawyer, James Teah Tarpeh, all (PhDs), and others, are once again desperate to have power by and through a well-deceived and half-cooked plan to have an Interim Government of National Unity (IGNU again, while President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf sits as President of Liberia. The past IGNU, took away Liberia’s money, chairs, rugs, computers, office tables, phones, and anything else their eye could barely see.

No to any and all foreign born unconstitutional governments of Liberia and Interim Government of National Unity (IGNU). In fact, it isa crime of Treason or Sedition to unseat a constituted Liberian Government; whether you like it or not. This a violation of Liberia’s Constitution, the New Penal Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Shame, shame, shame, and shame on Amos C. Sawyer, Boima Henry Fahnbulleh, Momo Rogers, James Teah, Tarpeh (PhDs); and all the deceptive crafters of the new IGNU and their foot-soldiers.

The Liberian People want peace, development and advancement. Amos C. Sawyer and his bunch of deceptive Progressives and Neo-Progressives, simply brought the Liberian People the crimes of:

1. CORRUPTION

2. MONEY LAUNDERING

3. CAPITAL FLIGHT, and lastly,

4. EBOLA to murder the remaining poor Liberian people and finish them off the face of the earth.

Liberia and its People desire and must have a new beginning. Liberia and Liberians need a new direction.

Liberians, if not now, then when?

Cllr. Frederick A.B. Jayweh
[email protected]
720-278-8735