Subscribe via RSS Feed

Archive for October, 2013

Liberia “most improved” nation in 2013? Untrue!

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh tws

 

The Sirleaf administration is celebrating, for good reason, the “good” news that Liberia is the “most improved” nation in 2013 in terms of governance, far better than the overwhelming bad news the president has constantly received from critics who believe governance hasn’t improved on her watch at all over the years.

The Ibrahim Index of African Governance established in 2007 to compile “an annual assessment of governance in every African country” believe otherwise, and apparently saw something impressive from their perspective to reach the conclusion that Liberia at #29 out of 52 overall, a (13-year change) made the grades to give the administration some bragging rights.

The public bragging and high-fives that came from the administration seemed to be premature, since the so-called good fortune is not trickling down to the Liberian people, in a country where most Liberians are poor, hungry and unemployed to believe such flowery report from the Ibrahim Index of African Governance that governance in the Sirleaf administration is worthy of an ounce of laudatory celebration.

More so, the Liberian people are extremely doubtful and suspicious of any international report that presents a one-sided positive report of a government that failed miserably to deliver public goods and services to its people.

As usual, the aftermath of such flowery assessment from the international community often lionizes and legitimizes Madam Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, whom in seven years failed to curtail corruption, fertilizes nepotism, failed to provide jobs, failed to provide affordable education and health services, and also failed to implement common sense transportation policy that serves Liberians well.

Even today in Liberia, the judiciary is not independent, the elections commission is not neutral and independent; and Madam Sirleaf still appoints members of the elections commission, even the ones that oversaw her 2011 re-election. Can you imagine an incumbent president appointing the elections commission members that oversees his or her re-election? That’s democracy in Liberia, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation’s definition.

Roads are bad or nonexistent in many parts of the country, and lacked sidewalks. And there is an urgent need for a better land policy that protects both city dwellers and rural Liberians from other Liberians and foreign companies that attempts to take away their properties.

The Mo Ibrahim Foundation defines governance as the “provision of the political, social and economic public goods and services that a citizen has the right to expect from his or her state, and that a state has the responsibility to deliver to its citizens. This definition is focused on outputs and outcomes of policy.”

That’s a great definition for governance. However, the definition is weak in terms of (output) - the delivery of goods and services to the Liberian people, because goods and services are not being delivered in Liberia on Ellen’s watch.

Also, the justifications given for declaring Liberia the ‘most improved’ nation in 2013 (“safety & rule of law; participation & human rights; sustainable economic opportunity and human development,” panders to the powerful political establishment in Liberia, and undermines the political and economic growth of Liberia.

Also, the war is over, and living in Liberia is like living in hell. Truth is, things are extremely bad in Ellen’s Liberia.

However, according to the Ibrahim Index of African Governance, “paucity of data in Africa remains a core concern for the Foundation. Many indicators of governance, such as poverty, do not yet meet the Foundation’s inclusion criteria, specifically with regards to time series and country coverage.”

True indeed, Liberia is part and parcel of the African continent where the paucity of information can be of concern to any researcher, which is an obvious limitation.

Other limitations possibly could be political interference and bad roads; lack of postal service, transportation and telecommunication service to conduct a survey to the rest of the country, et cetera, which makes the report hard to swallow.

Since poverty is a key component of governance, which is hardly on the report’s radar, it is difficult to fathom how a report of this magnitude can be taken seriously when the Liberian people are lingering in abject poverty and unemployment on Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s watch.

Liberians can attest to the fact that since the end of the civil war and the coming of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the rule of law and human rights have been violated and compromised many times.

Remember presidential friend Mary Broh slapping a senate staffer, and violently tearing down market stalls? How can safety be lauded in this report when motorcycle accidents and motor vehicle accidents are constantly occurring in the city of Monrovia, and on the nation’s deplorable highways?

Obviously, the country lacks better roads, trained and better paid law enforcement officers, and safety training programs for commercial and non-commercial drivers.

Rural dwellers are moving to the capital, Monrovia, in droves. There is no electricity in the rural areas; no running water and running sewer system, drainage or landfills to make life comfortable, and sea erosion is destroying all of coastal Liberia.

Did these researchers travel to rural Liberia to conduct their study, to get an accurate reading of the country? Did the researchers conduct their study only in Monrovia? Is Liberia the “most improved” country in 2013? Hmm!

Most Liberians don’t think so.

 

 

 

 

Liberia ‘most improved’ in 2013 Ibrahim Index of African Governance

Mo Ibrahim Foundation Mo Ibrahim 2013 Index of African Governance (Liberia)

14th October 2013

Liberia ‘most improved’ in 2013 Ibrahim Index of African Governance

Liberia leads table of biggest governance improvers in Africa since 2000, and has seen largest improvements in Safety & Rule of Law

The 2013 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), released today, reveals that Liberia is the ‘most improved country’ on the continent in terms of overall governance since 2000.

The top five most improved countries in the 2013 IIAG are all post-conflict countries: Liberia, Angola, Sierra Leone, Rwanda and Burundi.

The 2013 IIAG provides full details of Liberia’s performance across four categories of governance:

Safety & Rule of Law, Participation & Human Rights, Sustainable Economic Opportunity and Human Development.

Since 2000, Liberia has shown its biggest improvement in the category of

Safety & Rule of Law (a category in which many other African countries have seen recent deteriorations). Safety & Rule of Law measures judicial functions, accountability, transparency and corruption, property rights, personal safety and national security, among others.

Despite vast improvements since 2000, Liberia’s governance score remains below the continental average for Africa as well as the regional average for West Africa.

The 2013 IIAG shows that 94% of Africans live in a country that has experienced overall governance improvement since 2000.

The 6% of people living in a country that has experienced governance deterioration since 2000 are based in Madagascar, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Somalia, Libya and Mali.
Liberia’s performance in the 2013 IIAG:

Ranks 29th (out of 52) overall

 Scores 50.3 (out of 100), lower than the African average (51.6)

 Has improved by +24.8 since 2000

 Ranks 10th (out of 16) in the West African region

 Scores lower than the regional average for West Africa (52.5)

 Ranks its highest in the category

Participation & Human Rights (19th out of 52)

Ranks its lowest in the category

Sustainable Economic Opportunity (38th out of 52)

 Ranks its highest in the sub-category

Participation (9th out of 52) and ranks its lowest in the sub-category Health (46th out of 52)

http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org

From drug use to suicide there is only one step

By Clemente Ferrer Do not use drugs

 

The Spanish Foundation Against Drug Addiction has released a campaign under the slogan “Drugs not only harm those who consume them. Everything has a price.” The aim is to raise public awareness about the presence of drugs.

Another advertising campaign was also presented and aimed at young people, schoolchildren, warning them of the dangers of drugs, under the slogan: “Drugs. Are you going to play?” The campaign appeals to the responsibility of adolescents, showing that smoking pot increases the damage of drugs: “Drugs did always charge an invoice. Open your eyes”, says the communication of the National Drugs Plan.

Drug reaches the brain directly. A study by the Office of National Drug Control Policy in Washington, notes that drugs can cause damage, such as anxiety, melancholy, psychotic episodes and suicidal tendencies. Could this be what someone seeks in clear line with the culture of death?

It is a fact that drugs are one of the scourges of society today. Drug addiction has taken root in the youth population worldwide. We are researching how to end this social scourge, which only leads to death. We must fight for life, which is sacred.

It is necessary to combat the drugs with proper education, with less permissiveness, with greater respect for the individual and offering to the youths a vital perspective. Drug abuse causes physical and mental deterioration, that transforms a one-moment paradise in a hell that lasts long and is unbearable. The drug is a one-way road, with no return.

We need an urgent battle against the drug trade and consumption, to curb this sword of Damocles that is so harmful to our society, because it causes crime, cruelty and promotes the physical and psychological devastation of many teenagers.

The emptiness of God, did not lead to despair? Hopelessness leads to dehumanization. The man without God is dehumanized and becomes an enemy to himself. Narcotics abuse leads to this. “I have seen the greatest minds of my generation, crawl through the streets at dawn, looking urgently and imperatively for drugs,” says Allen Ginsberg.

On the way to Mexico in 2012, Benedict XVI said: “We must do all that we can to counter this evil which destroys society and our youth; to educate consciences towards moral responsibility, to expose the worship of money that enslaves humans, unmasking evil, false promises, the lies and the fraud that are involved in drugs”.

 

Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

Insight into the Zoomlion saga in Liberia and Ghana

By Amunyahn K. Amafla & Siahyonkron Nyanseor ZOOMLION

 

There is a famous adage that reads: “Birds of the same feathers flock together.” Also, Amafla learned from his mother before her death that when a stranger (visitor) arrives to town, the primary possessions taken from his/her traveling luggage are the characteristics of the traveler.

And so, it was not difficult for Zoomlion, Ghana Limited (d/b/a Zoomlion) to find partnership in the corrupt circle of President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf’s Unity Party (UP) government. Moreover, it was not long before the sanitation service provider, Zoomlion’s true business practices were exposed in Liberia by the World Bank. We must posit that we were forewarned and admonished about Zoomlion’s corrupt practices in Ghana, and the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and business practice of the company prior to its arrival in Monrovia, the Liberian capital. Notwithstanding, we patiently waited to experience the truth to the admonition.

Allegedly, we were informed that Zoomlion’s triumphant entry into Liberia was facilitated by the former Monrovia City Mayor, Madam Mary Broh through the support of the Monrovia City Corporation (MCC). That allegation has been confirmed by FrontPageAfrica (FPA). Reportedly, FPA’s confirmation includes the unflinching advocacy of Montserrado County Senator, Geraldine Doe Sheriff, and Project Manager for the World Bank, Mr. Peter Ofori Asumadu. These were the known catalysts, which created the path for Zoomlion’s success in winning the bid in Liberia.

According to FPA, five (5) companies bided for the World Bank sanitation contracts for Liberia. The contracts were for sanitization of two locations; the Stockton Creek and Fiamah regions of Monrovia. Accordingly, documentation proves that the NC Sanitors won the two contracts but it was awarded to Zoomlion. The World Bank Project Manager, Project Implementation Unit (PIU) at the MCC, Mr. Osamadu contributed by leaking out the bidding process and criteria to the Ghanaian company. As part of the corrupt network, reportedly, the former city mayor, Madam Broh wrote Mrs. Elfreda Stewart Tamba, Head of the Revenue Section at the Liberian Ministry of Finance (MOF) on March 29, 2011 instructing her to exempt Zoomlion from import levies. It is our honest guess and opinion that the exemption was justified as “investment incentives”for helping to abate the sanitation problem in addition to curbing the unemployment, underemployment situation in Liberia, a practice common with domestic and foreign investment in most developing economies.

As each African community has a unique expression, it was echoed in Liberian parlance and vernaculars that “when you pull rope, rope pulls bush.” For purpose of the reader’s quick and easy understanding, it can simply be translated as “Where there is smoke, there is fire”. Therefore, while the World Bank exposure of Zoomlion’s corrupt acquisition of its sanitation contracts for Liberia and malpractices reported in the Ghana Youth Employment and Entrepreneurial Development Agency (GYEEDA) Report released by the Ghanaian Ministry of Youths and Sports (MOYS) pinpoints improprieties of Zoomlion’s activities in Ghana, it should not be truncated and placed on the shelf of oblivion.

As we attempt to lynch Zoomlion for corrupt practices, we should remember, “It takes two, baby ah, me and you…” according to the lyrics of the late Motown great, Marvin Gaye. If it takes two, then for bribery to occur there must be a receiver and giver of the bribe, who are equally guilty. Upon the foregoing logic, it is correct to assume and allege that corrupt practices highlighted herein involved several individuals in all instances and at all levels of Zoomlion malpractices which are not mentioned in our reportage due to the absence of full disclosure to us as of yet.

However, the World Bank released a report on the story acknowledging that the World Bank Group has placed a ban on Zoomlion over bribery charges in Liberia. Based on the published report, Zoomlion paid bribes to facilitate contract execution and processing of invoices. The charges are centered on the World Bank-financed Emergency Monrovia Urban Sanitation Project. Accordingly, Zoomlion will not qualify for any contract financed by the World Bank Group for a period of two years as of September 24, 2013.

The World Bank said, “Zoomlion needed to demonstrate full and satisfactory compliance with the World Bank Integrity standards in order for the ban to be lifted”. The bank said, “Zoomlion has acknowledged wrongdoing and accepted full responsibility”. As corrective measures to ensure that such malpractices do not re-occur, “the company is enforcing disciplinary action and commitment to a new standard of integrity governing its operations”, according to Leonard McCarthy, World Bank Integrity Vice President.

Prior to the ban on Zoomlion and based on the aforementioned premise and resurgence of new information relative to this story, the former Monrovia City Mayor, Madam Broh had travelled to Accra, perhaps to engage and encourage Zoomlion to apply for the world bank-financed contract. We believe she was introduced to Zoomlion by the Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA) Mayor, the honorable Alfred O. Vanderpuije. Thereafter, the former Monrovia municipal CEO encouraged and advocated Zoomlion’s participation in the bidding process. Under her guidance, the Monrovia City Government categorically recommended the Ghanaian sanitation service provider; and with the aid of the World Bank Project Manager, Mr. Osamadu, the company won the award. What is wrong with this?

As per past allegations against world organizing bodies such as; the International Monetary Funds (IMF), World Bank, International Finance Committee (IFC) United Nations (UN) organizations including the European Union (EU) officials and personnel, we are inclined to believe that the reported malpractices by Zoomlion could not only involve the Monrovia City Government officials and the service provider but also a multiple of individuals; some Liberian Government officials including World Bank authority.

Our inclination to include World Bank officials’ involvement is based on previously televised CNN documentary several years ago portraying some elements of international organizations’ participation in such practices. Nevertheless, we could not exclude Government of Ghana officials (GOG) either based on the GYEEDA (Ghana Youth and Employment and Entrepreneurial) Report. These officials may also have their hands in the cookie jar and are on the same band wagon with Zoomlion’s corrupt operations in Ghana.

It has been proven that Zoomlion is acclimatized to malfeasance and misfeasance. According to the GYEEDA REPORT released by MOYS, Zoomlion is guilty and responsible for over charging the Ghanaian Government; an assertion to which the African sanitation service provider giant admits and agreed to correct and re-submit its bill to the government. It appears Zoomlion has elected to use this as a tactic and solution to quench the fire (corruption charges) whenever it is caught in such practices as we shall read in the GYEEDA Report.

In 2006, the GOG felt threatened by massive unemployment and underemployment of the youths and promptly resolved to combat this insecurity by establishing the National Youths Employment Program (NYEP). Due to several institutional lags, the NYEP never got started on time as scheduled and intended when funding sources were identified by the government.

However, in 2012 after series of governmental discussions to respond to the youth’s unemployment and underemployment quagmire, it endeavored to transform the NYEP into a more formidable program. On November 01, 2012, the Ghanaian Cabinet of the ruling NDC Government gave approval to change the name NYEP and GYEEDA was born. It was charged with the responsibilities to coordinate all youth employment and entrepreneurial programs in the country.

Thereafter, GYEEDA created and implemented thirty-four (34) working modules as of the date and time the report was released. These modules were useful in awarding contracts to Ghanaian business organizations. During these developments and at this junction, GYEEDA awarded a contract to Zoomlion through Module 9. The contract was to commence on March 01, 2011 and mature two (2) years thereafter; to be exact, February 28, 2013.

The contract required Zoomlion to provide waste management and other related services to district assemblies. As a service provider and as per module 9, Zoomlion was expected to train for potential employment and entrepreneurial opportunities, Thirty-seven Thousand (37,000) lads as its contributions to the reduction of youth unemployment and underemployment problem in the country. The company proposed to achieve the above result by accepting Gh500 per beneficiary and management fee, an equivalent of US$238.10. The detail breakdown is as follows:

 

Youth Trainee Allowance: GH100 or US$47.62

Zoomlion Mgt. Fee: Gh400 or US$198.48

 

This compensation structure was approved by GYEEDA and the MOYS. Training and employment schedule was supplemented by provisions of tricycles, motor bikes along with operational, technical and other general overhead expenses amounting to Gh10,780,692 or US$5,133,662.86 per month.

According to the report breakdown, the above financial expenses were submitted deliberately erroneous, fraudulent and deceptively. At the conclusion of the GYEEDA Report and per its recommendation, Zoomlion agreed to have overcharged the GOG and is willing to re-submit a more accurate bill commensurate with services provided.

If this is the modus of operandi of Zoomlion, how many more victims are there, considering the Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA) with which it also does business not ignoring its activities in Angola? Just thinking aloud with concerns for the company, corporate staff, employees and the global public, which can affect employment situations in each of these African countries, a hint to the prudent is quite sufficient.

While addressing the opening session of a three-day conference of the African Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (AAACA) in Accra, the Ghanaian capital, President John Dramani Mahama affirmed the government’s resolve to prosecute persons identified to have been involved in financial malfeasance in the GYEEDA) report. Accordingly the Ghanaian president said:

”We have started the process of restructuring GYEEDA and I have requested the Attorney General’s office to sanction any persons identified to have been involved in wrongdoing in the GYEEDA affair”.

We pray that the exemplary remarks made by President Mahama will be carried out in Ghana and emulated by President Johnson-Sirleaf as it pertains to Zoomlion affairs in Liberia and other pending matters of corrupt practices involving nepotism, cronyism and favoritism in Liberia and the continent.

The Government of Liberia and the World Bank must bring pressure to bear on the former City Mayor, Madam Broh and Mrs. Tamba of the Liberian revenue section, MOF and Senator Sheriff. Similarly, the World Bank should probe further into the story as we do not believe the Project Manager, Mr. Osamadu is the only high ranking World Bank official involved in this corruption practice. We emphatically suggest that the World Bank should withdraw the contracts from Zoomlion if it has not done so already, and award them to the real documented winner of the bid, the NC Sanitors.

On the African continent, we would like to encourage President Johnson-Sirleaf to join hands with her Ghanaian counter-part, President Mahama and equally call on the Attorney General of Liberia to sanction any individuals of Liberian nationality involved. The Liberian Attorney General should find out the extent of their involvement for criminal offence such as compensation received and for interrupting fairness in granting the contracts. The aggrieved parties must be tried in the court of law and if found guilty, bribes received must be refunded with stiff punishment.

Quite recently prior to releasing this article, we were appalled to learn that President Johnson-Sirleaf has appointed Madam Broh as Director of General Services Agency (GSA). This semi ministerial agency is the chief and centralized purchasing arm of the Liberian Government. Can you believe it, while President Mahama is resolute to penalize wrong doers in his NDC Government; the Liberian president is recycling the possible chief culprit in the corrupt Zoomlion operations in Liberia.

As we wonder, what will it takes for President Johnson-Sirleaf to do the “right thing”. Majority of the Liberian people at home and abroad are protesting against her government as observed in New York City during the recent UN meeting because of nepotism (three sons and host of extended family members given appointments in her government) and cronyism (Madam Broh and the likes as center stage actors).

No wonder some prominent world leaders have shied away from the supposedly “iron lady” of Africa; the first democratically elected female president in Africa and the only woman amongst twenty-two elected Liberian presidents since 1847. Why would a person of proper training and excellent education who belongs to the prominent club of strong Liberian women such as; Angie Brooks-Randolph, former President of the UN General Assembly (deceased), Agnes von Ballmoos, strong human right activist (deceased), Dr. Mary Antoinette Grimes Brown Sherman, former President of the University of Liberia (deceased), Judge Emma Shannon Walser, Liberia’s first female Circuit Court Judge and H.E. Olubanke King-Akerele, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Liberia, just to name a few tarnish her image because of selfish Liberians.

Why would President Johnson-Sirleaf tarnish her reputation by continually embracing Madam Broh and the likes in her government? It is not late to deliver good governance to the Liberian people based on social justice - by “Putting Liberia First”.

 

Amunyahn K. Amafla is a veteran African journalist, who is the Senior Investigator of KpanWin Center for Exposing Corruption Practices in Africa (KWC). Mr. Amafla has been a journalist for over 30 years. He resides in West and Southern Africa. He can be contacted through Mr. Nyanseor, Senior Fellow of the KWC Group.

Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor is a journalist, cultural and political activist. He is Chairman of the Liberian Democratic Future (LDF); publisher of theperspective.org online newsmagazine. He serves as Senior Advisor to the Voice of Liberia newsmagazine as well as Senior Advisor to MOLAC and CLACI. Also,Mr. Nyanseor is Senior Fellow of the KWC Group. In 2012, he Co-authored Djogbachiachuwa: The Liberian Literature Anthology. He can be reached at: [email protected].

CJL remembers five American nuns killed in Liberia’s civil war

By Lovetta Gbeh Tugbeh Coalition for Justice in Liberia

“They called themselves freedom fighters, but they killed innocent people. We pray for those liars.” These are the words of the late Roman Catholic Archbishop, Michael Kpakala Francis, expressing his remorse and antipathy surrounding the horrific killings of five catholic nuns at the evil hands of war criminals who maimed, raped, and murdered more than 250, 000 innocent
Liberians and foreign nationals during Liberia’s 14-year civil war. Under the notorious code name of “Operation Octopus,” the rebel forces of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) headed by convicted war criminal Charles Taylor, carried out a gruesome campaign of indiscriminately killing innocent Liberians and foreign nationals in the Barnersville community, located on the outskirts of Monrovia, the country’s civic and commercial capital.

Verifiable and documented reports, including revelations made at the public hearings of Liberia’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), a few years ago, uncovered that Operation Octopus was conceived with the purpose of
implementing a pogrom to ensure that the NPFL exerted full and total control over the City of Monrovia and its environs. This would become the NPFL’s scorched-earth policy and template for prosecuting its senseless war throughout the 90’s, making the city unsafe and unlivable for its inhabitants, and meting out unspeakable crimes to instill fear and submission in the populace. This particular operation was spearheaded by one General Christopher “Mosquito” Vambo, who, acting on orders from his
high commandant Charles Taylor, held the nuns captive, had them disrobed and bludgeoned to death. The Illinois-based
missionaries,<http://articles.latimes.com/1992-11-01/news/mn-1831_1_civil-war>Sisters Kathleen McGuire, Barbara Muttra, Agnes Mueller, Mary Kolar, and Shirley Kolmer, were all brutally murdered by Charles Taylor and his militia. Although, Mr. Charles Taylors was charged for war crimes in neighboring Sierra Leone and sentenced to a 50-yr prison term by the
International Crimes Court(ICC), neither he and other war crimes perpetrators were charged for war crimes in Liberia.

Nearly 21 years after this horrendous criminal act that was carried out on October 20, 1992, the Coalition for Justice in Liberia (CJL) wishes to remember these five nuns for the sacrificial humanitarian services they rendered the people of Liberia, many of whom are living impoverished and traumatized war victims. The enviable missionary work of these nuns, who left the comfort of their homeland in the United States to come to Liberia to help educate its youth and treat its sick, should not go unnoticed as thousands of Liberian youths otherwise would not have had that opportunity. They benefitted greatly from their tremendous sacrifice and generosity. One youth recalling his experience, remembered the nuns as “loving, kind, and caring” in all that they did during their many years in Liberia.

Moreover, CJL recognizes and applauds the significant contributions the nuns and the Catholic church have made in some of the remotest areas of the country that is yet to experience the presence and impact of the national government policies.

Today as we remember these nuns, CJL feels compelled to call attention to the quest for justice for the victims of the Liberian civil war. We cannot ignore the fact that those estimated 250,000 innocent Liberians and foreign nationals who lost their lives at the brutal hands of war perpetrators, are yet to experience the bells of justice. The country now rightfully brags about 10 years of peace, with the support of the international community, which all Liberians must celebrate and fight to keep, but at the same time, we must remind our fellow compatriots that our peace is still fragile, and we can only have sustained peace when it is rooted in justice. Let us not forget that peace is not only the absence of war or tension, it is foremost the presence of justice. As Liberians, we can only enjoy real peace when war perpetrators who committed crimes of war and crimes against humanity,
face the full weight of justice. CJL will not relent in its advocacy for truth and justice, and will continue to immortalize those who died in this senseless war that left deep scars on our nation.

May the souls of these nuns and those who died in the reckless carnage of Operation Octopus, forever be remembered.

Lovetta G. Tugbeh, is interim Director, Coalition for Justice in Liberia (CJL).

Coalition for Justice in Liberia (CJL)
25-A Crescent Dr Suite 211
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Contact: [email protected]

A broken system

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh broken government in Liberia

 

Somewhere in Monrovia, President Sirleaf is probably thinking about her next move.

Madam Sirleaf perhaps could be planning another foreign trip since she is known to constantly fly out of the country at a moment’s notice.

Madam Sirleaf could be thinking about distributing ‘development’ funds to her political cronies in the name of developing their part of Liberia. She could be thinking about appointing another family member or crony to an influential and lucrative government post.

That’s not all.

Sirleaf could be signing contracts with foreign companies to exploit the nation’s natural resources, without making the foreign companies build the processing plants, decent roads, clinics and schools in the part of Liberia the companies are excavating and exploiting.

Minimum wage in Liberia is now $6.40 a day. In a factory and mine? Slave wages! This is disgraceful and disgusting!

Sirleaf could also be thinking about appointing members of the elections commission, or she could be thinking about issuing presidential pardons for failing test takers at the University of Liberia.

These are few of the many roles Liberian presidents, including Ellen Johnson often shoulders, which is common in a country that allows its presidents to have absolute and dominant political power to be relevant.

As always the case in politics, such absolute presidential powers often leads to presidential overreach.

Because in most cases in Liberia, those decisions are made unilaterally and with naked arrogance by a sitting president who by now is smitten by the bug of power, authority, influence and money, which tends to corrupt the president.

Presidents can travel to foreign countries occasionally (when it is necessary) to attend to the nation’s affairs, but are not supposed to travel endlessly when there is a foreign minister, commerce minister, trade representative, ambassadors, et cetera, the way Ellen Johnson Sirleaf has traveled to foreign countries nearly every month since she became president. Again, where is legislative oversight and accountability?

Doling out development funds to county officials is not part of the president’s job description. Abolish that criminal practice now, since the practice is plagued by corruption, mismanagement, thievery and lack of work.

It is better to elect independent board members to work with development experts, contractors, and county officials to make the practice efficient, manageable and realistic.

The same is true with the National Elections Commission. Why should a sitting president appoint members of an Elections Commission to oversee elections that the incumbent and her party officials contests? Where is fairness? Where is neutrality and independence?

Madam Sirleaf was an incumbent during the last elections that her appointed elections commission members coordinated and supposedly refereed. Talk about conflict of interests? This is another example.

Madam Sirleaf has redefined ‘nepotism’ to conveniently fit her selfish political and family agenda.

Instead of working with those spineless legislators in Monrovia to make laws that discourages elected officials, and especially a sitting president from hiring family members, this president has shamelessly endorsed the practice.

Her son, Robert Sirleaf recently resigned from NOCAL, the national oil company, after worldwide criticism and condemnation from Diaspora activist groups and their international sympathizers. Son Charles Sirleaf is deputy head at the Central Bank, while Fumba Sirleaf heads the National Security Agency. Other Sirleaf clan members are scattered in other parts of the Liberian government.

Madam Sirleaf also influences and controls the judiciary. The president is the jury, the prosecutor and the judge in most cases. As a result, there is no fairness and independence in the judicial system.

There is no price control in the country, customer service is too damn poor in the country, and the price of rice, the nation’s staple, is now $75.00, from $50, in a country whose ‘legal tender’ notes supposed to be the worthless “Liberty.”

So if you are unemployed, how are you supposed to get US dollars to buy rice and other products in Liberia? Why have the ‘Liberty’ currency in the first place when business throughout the country is conducted in US dollars?

Where’s the ‘change’ she promised the Liberian people?

Instead of improving and funding the healthcare system in the country, Madam ‘frequent flyer’ Sirleaf and some government officials often travels to the U.S for medical care and their annual physicals.

When a president does not have confidence in his or her own hospitals and clinics, do you think others will have confidence in the healthcare system in that country? Of course, only the poor and politically powerless with no means to travel out of the country are the ones who are compelled to seek medical care there.

When these grievous offenses occur, the people obviously will dissent, as we have seen in Liberia and in the United States over and over and through out the years.

Madam Sirleaf obviously duped the Liberian people to be elected president. Other politicians and former warlords around her followed her lead. As a team, they continued to destroy Liberia.

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is not a change agent. Where’s leadership and vision? What became of the TRC final report? Former warlords are now Senators and Representatives. Legislative tenure for these bozos are 7 and 9 years respectively for Senators and Representatives. Why?

Where is accountability and legislative oversight? The people are suffering. Garbage is littered throughout the country. Unemployment is sky high.

Education and healthcare are in shambles or too high to afford. There is no sensible transportation plan in all of Liberia. There is no emergency evacuation plan in all of Liberia. There is no erosion control for the beaches. The sea is destroying beaches and homes in coastal Liberia.

It is time for Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to resign, be impeached or overthrown.

 

“History makes strange bedfellows!”

By Siahyonkron Nyanseor Siahyonkron J.K. Nyanseor

 

The idiom, “History makes strange bedfellows” is entering into a peculiar alliance with people you do not share the same beliefs, but are at the center of power more accessible to you, and produces the results you want. This is the case with many Liberians and Liberian organizations at home and in the Diaspora.

I belief in Democracy that promotes contending ideals that helps society to become better, instead of promoting a “one-size fit all” mindset. The latter approach simply wants President Obama to dance to the beat of their drums. Yet another human being who is not a SAINT dares refer to me in a similar manner, as not having relevance. Find below his statement:

Mr. Nyanseor, I feel good. I was just sharing your story as I do with others. For me you have no impact therefore your views, stories mean nothing to me. You [are] not a serious person.

One might want to know what triggered this comment! I wrote an article entitled: “Blind Faith in Man: Supporters of Ellen and the Unity Party (UP) Government of Liberia”. This gentleman saw it fit to send my article to current and none current Eminent Persons of ULAA with the comment: “This is what the Chairman of ULAA Council of Eminent Person, Nyanseor wrote.” Here is my response below:

What is your point here? What else is new? As an individual, don’t I have the right to write about what I see is wrong? Check my record. I am very consistent!

The byline of the article reads: By Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor, NOT Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor, CHAIR OF UCEP.

Thanks for letting me know how you feel. You put it out there!

This brings me to the purpose of this article. As a believer in God Almighty, what another man tells me or says of me means nothing to me, because the God I worship made me so different that I am one of a kind. There is no one like me! God has blessed me with 66 years on this earth, which I do not deserve; and He still has mercy on me. Because of that I thank Him every minute of the day. Moreover, He equipped me with what it takes to be an instrument to fulfill the adage: “The pen is mightier than the sword.” I take it a step further to say in this digital age, the computer and the Internet are mightier than the sword. Therefore, I do not listen to the noise in the market which would prevent me from doing what is right. I therefore consider it my moral obligation and duty to speak and write about any issue that I consider WRONG in our society.

Leadership role requires that one must be able to speak the truth no matter the consequence! A good example is the recent comment President Barack Obama made regarding the name of Washington, D.C.’s Football team – the Red Skins. The name Red Skins is offensive to Native Americans.

Ray Halbritter, leader of the Oneida Indian Nation, a tribe in Upstate New York that has been campaigning against the name said: “There’s just no place for a professional football team to be using what the dictionary defines as a racially offensive term.” To which Harjo added: “There’s no such thing as a good stereotype, no matter how well-intentioned, no matter how good people feel about it, …it still has negative ramifications for our people.”

I have a serious problem waiting on everybody to agree before one takes a stand. This approach makes one an unintended accomplice to heinous crimes, emotional and physical abuse, and corrupt practices perpetrated against poor and venerable people; sitting by supinely and watching without coming to the defense of the victims, makes the person callous.

What moral authority do the accusers have to refer to us as “Disturbing the Peace, Stability, Progress, and Success of the regime under whose watch all BAD practices are prevalent? How dare they have the audacity to call themselves leaders when they do not speak on behalf of the people? Instead, they identify with the same people who declared corruption our number one enemy, and still employ corrupt people in the government; and invite corrupt companies to operate in the country without doing due diligence.

The last time I checked the dictionary:

* Nepotism is considered a crime;

* Paying BIG SALARIES to a select few who are NOT doing anything

EXTRAORDINARY, is still a corrupt practice, and

* Calling one a representative of the people and NOT advocating on their behalf, is a deceitful practice.

If the President whom they unquestionably support can say: “The government welcomes ULAA as a strong partner and having a strong relationship, not only in terms of organization to organization, but organization to government. I hope that the new leadership will resolve your internal problems and that you can become strong again.”

The President’s statement speaks volumes, and implies that ULAA is an OLDER PERSON with NO TEETH, just like a TOOTHLESS BULLDOG.

The idiom, “History makes strange bedfellows” is entering into a peculiar alliance with people you do not share the same beliefs with, but are at the center of power more accessible to you, and produces the results you want. This is what is happening with many Liberians and Liberian organizations in the Diaspora and in Liberia.

This reminds me of historian John Henrik Clarke’s profound statement about history. According to him:

History is the clock that people use to tell their political and cultural time of day. It is also a compass that people use to find themselves on the map of human geography…history tells a people where they have been and what they have been, where they are and what they are. Most important, an understanding of history tells a people where they still must go and what they still must be.

Many of the present leaders of ULAA are not aware of the role the organization has played in the recent past in the lives of our people in Liberia and the Diaspora. When ULAA was founded, we pledged to be the conscience of the Liberian people. We succeeded until Lucifer got hold of some of our leaders who were employed by him to do his dirty work. You know the rest of the story!

As a reminder, let me share with you the ULAA many of you do not know in the 323-page book titled: “My Compatriot, Your Compatriot: Surveying Forces and Voices” that inspired the Union of Liberian Associations in the Americas.

In the book, Professor K-Moses Nagbe, writer, poet and academician, explores the ideas and ideals, which inspired young Liberians studying in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s to organize the Union of Liberian Associations in the United States [Americas] (ULAA). Nagbe’s pioneering work established links between the Civil Rights struggle in America and social reform activism in West Africa [Republic] of Liberia. Frantz Fanon, Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael, Martin King, Jr. etc. featured in this insightful conversation about the reality that there comes a moment in the lives of ordinary people when they are bound to scream, “Enough is enough!”

According to the author: The book goes beyond peripheral questions like “What is ULAA? How did it come into being? What was the vision and mission of the organization?” The book identifies some of the critical voices that inspired ULAA. It tells how ULAA impacted national politics and governance both from abroad and inside the country…

The adage, “History makes strange bedfellows” is captured in the example provided by Benjamin Kofa Fyneah of Gainesville, Florida. An exerpt: “The recent history of paid government agents, including the President herself, who are vociferously condemning and maligning the protest of yesterday [October 24, 2013] leaves much to be desired. The President is a product of the ACDL, a group that was conceived and existed in constant PROTESTATIONS against the Liberian government of Samuel Doe. NOT satisfied with peaceful protests, they resorted to aiding and abetting the NPFL – actions that led to the DEMISE of the Liberian nation!” (“Protesting Ellen Johnson Sirleaf in New York – Liberia’s Paul Revere Moment!” September 25, 2013).

Conclusion

Wole Soyinka tells us that “The greatest threat to freedom is the absence of criticism.” As such, in any struggle, be it in Liberia or any part of the world that a people start, some of them will not live to see it to the end; some will either die in the process, while others will betray the cause (sell out); age may cause others to slow down; while some may take another approach due to circumstances, and then there are those who will stick around to serve as advisors to the young people who will carry on where they left out. Even those who started the struggle, and for certain reasons, stopped – should not be dismissed but rather be given some credits for starting the struggle in the first place.

Those who stick around deserve respect from their benefactors, because they have the battle scars to show for their struggles. They are needed not to monopolize leadership, but to serve as guard for the young people to avoid the mistakes of the past. And together they will come up with a better approach in addressing the problem. With the experience of the older folks, and the technological know how of young people, both groups can develop a better approach to address the problem that affects them. Since they are in this together, it is only fitting for the young ones to respect their elders, because with age comes experience, “for experience is the best teacher.” The Bible says, “Respect your elders, so your days on earth may be long.” Therefore, the way forward is not to apportion blame, but to work together to take care of the people’s business. This is what Chinua Achebe referred to so eloquently: “When old people speak it is not because of the sweetness of words in our mouths; it is because we see something which you do not see.”

Therefore, my brethren, let’s have patience with one another so all that matters will be the end results we crave. We need each other to achieve our goals. We, the older folks are on our way out; you young people are our benefactors. Respect is all we need from you! Is this too much to ask? I think not! Our native people say, “The one you love is the one you advise; your enemy you care less about.” Let’s be civil to each other and put Liberia FIRST!

I close with the poem, “When Things Chakla.”

WHEN THINGS CHAKLA © Nov. 11, 1995

I

When things Chakla

They cannot be fixed

Or returned to their original state

It is easy to spoil things

Than to have them return

To their original state

The conditions

Of our villages

Towns and cities

Are good examples

Of the type of destructions

Of which I speak

II

The same is true

Regarding brothers, sisters

Former play and schoolmates

Killing each other over hatred

Revenge and ethnicity

Therefore, these warring factions

Need to be reminded

Of the old saying that

When things chakla

They cannot be fixed

III

Whenever one pulls rope

Rope pulls bush

So these warring factions

Need to learn this fact of life

That when things chakla

They can never return

To their original position

So the unnecessary destructions

Of our resources

And infrastructure

Will have to stop

IV

The warring factions

Need to be reminded that

We the people will remember

How they CHAKLA our dreams

Therefore, when the time comes

We will reward them well

Siahyonkron J. K. Nyanseor is a poet, a Griot, journalist, cultural and political activist, and an ordained Minister of the Gospel. He is Chairman of the Liberian Democratic Future (LDF); publisher of theperspective.org online newsmagazine. He serves as Senior Advisor to the Voice of Liberia newsmagazine as well as Senior Advisor to MOLAC and CLACI. In 2012, he Co-authored Djogbachiachuwa: The Liberian Literature Anthology. He can be reached at: [email protected].

 

 

A proven security strategy to end crisis in the Middle East

By Kulwant Singh & David Leffler ph_david_leffler_phd

A new technology of defense is now available that has been scientifically shown to prevent war and create peace by harnessing the deepest level of nature’s functioning.

War is ultimately a human problem requiring a human solution. Experts in the field of conflict resolution maintain that the underlying cause of war is accumulated “social stress” - i.e., mounting political, religious and/or ethnic tensions between rival factions in critical hotspots throughout the world. As social stress builds, divisions grow stronger, groups take sides, diplomats become unable to resolve differences, and enemies arise within or outside the nation. Military force may then be invoked to protect the country, resulting in armed conflict and unpredictable outcomes. But even if conflict temporarily solves the problem for the victor, the social stress remains, fueling future cycles of conflict. In contrast, the absence of collective stress translates into the absence of tension between competing sides, thereby reducing the probability of hostilities.

Today, the militaries of the Middle East have an opportunity to overcome the cycle of war by deploying a scientifically verified technology of defense that neutralizes social stress. This new technology is based on the unified field of all the laws of
nature - the most fundamental and powerful level of nature’s functioning. The technology accesses and enlivens this unified
field through subjective technologies of consciousness, thereby creating aprofound influence of coherence and harmony throughout society that results in measurable reductions of crime, terrorism, and war.

The late Maharishi Mahesh Yogi revived systematic subjective technologies for experiencing the unified field, including the Transcendental Meditation program and its advanced techniques. When used in a military context these meditation
practices are known as Invincible Defence Technology (IDT). They have been successfully applied by members of many faiths to eliminate conflict. If any military in the Middle East region were to properly apply these non-lethal and non-destructive technologies, it could reduce collective societal stress and resulting conflict.

Over 50 research studies confirm that when the required threshold of IDT experts is crossed - approximately the square root of 1% of a given population - crime goes down, quality of life indices go up, and war and terrorism abate. Scientists have named this phenomenon the Maharishi Effect, since Maharishi Mahesh Yogi first predicted it. The causal mechanism appears
to be a field effect of consciousness - a spillover effect on the level of the unified field from the peace-creating group into the larger population.

In 1983, a two-month Maharishi Effect intervention in Israel resulted in a 76% reduction in war deaths in neighboring Lebanon (p < 10-7) when group size exceeded the square root of 1% threshold ( <http://www.davidleffler.com/sapratableii.html#b41> Journal of Conflict Resolution). Seven subsequent, consecutive experiments over a two-year period during the peak of the Lebanon war found

. war-related fatalities decreased by 71% (p < 10-10)

. war-related injuries fell by 68% (p < 10-6)

. the level of conflict dropped by 48% (p < 10-8)

. cooperation among antagonists increased by 66% (p < 10-6)

The likelihood that these combined results were due to chance is less than one part in 1019) ( <http://www.davidleffler.com/sapratableii.html#b13>
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality). A global-scale study published in the <http://www.davidleffler.com/sapratableii.html#b43> Journal of
Offender Rehabilitation documented a 72% drop in international terrorism.

Militaries are responsible for defending their citizens. They can now succeed in this mission simply by creating a Prevention Wing - a group of IDT experts. The size of the Prevention Wing would be small - approximately the square root of 1% of the population of the country. To protect the population of the entire Middle East region, approximately 1,717 soldiers
would be needed.

As part of its responsibility to protect the nation, the military is obligated to thoroughly examine scientifically proven methods for preventing war and terrorism. With the IDT approach, all that is necessary is to provide the proper training for groups of military personnel - or indeed, any sizable group within the nation. Any military has the opportunity today
through IDT to create national security, invincibility, and peace. But the time to act is now.

About the Authors:

Major General (Ret.) Kulwant Singh, UYSM., Ph.D., leads an international
group of generals and defense experts that advocates Invincible Defense
Technology. He was awarded the Uttam Yudh Sewa Medal, the second highest
decoration for senior officers during operations in Sri Lanka as part of
IPKF (Indian Peace Keeping Force).

David Leffler, Ph.D., Executive Director at the Center for Advanced Military
Science, is the author of “
<http://www.davidleffler.com/preventing-enemies.html> A New Role for the
Military: Preventing Enemies from Arising - Reviving an Ancient Approach to
Peace.” He is on <http://www.twitter.com/drdavidleffler> Twitter.

Monogamy, marital fidelity and sexual abstinence are the weapons to fight AIDS

By Clemente Ferrer Bob Geldof

 

The singer and political activist Bob Geldof (pictured), at a meeting of the British Labour Party, praised for AIDS policy stating that “monogamy, fidelity in marriage and abstinence are the most effective weapons to combat AIDS – rather, to ensure that the disease does not progress.”

Interestingly, his position is not based on religious values, but on the finding that where this policy is not applied, AIDS continues to grow.

When the 30th anniversary of the discovery of the causes of AIDS infection, the UN drafted a statement insisting that the means used to this day, have failed miserably. Official data on the disease are staggering: about 33 million people have died over the last three decades, and every day the virus spreads to more than 7,000 people worldwide. To cope with AIDS were employed last year, more than 16,000 million dollars in economic aid to combat this social evil.

Moreover, Republican Congressman Chris Smith, provided indisputable evidence of the triumph that has gotten AIDS prevention in African countries when seated on abstinence and fidelity. From the House of Representatives, Smith drew a bill to revive the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS.

The Department of State and the Department of Health and Human Services of the United States accepts the infallible measure of abstinence and fidelity in these programs, Smith noted that both attitudes have been an important factor in tackling the spread of AIDS virus in Uganda, Kenya and Zimbabwe. According to the journal “Science“, the reduction of AIDS among Zimbabwean men between 17 and 29 years was 23%. Among women aged 15-24 years it was 49%.%.

A U.S. Senate committee agree to increase the budget for programs against AIDS virus in Africa. Perhaps the largest effort was awarded to the President of Uganda, who managed to modify people’s sexual behavior to prevent the danger of AIDS.

The Spanish writer Julián Marías understood that “the main cause of this disease is the lack of sex life standards, standards that have always existed and through which men have behaved human and made possible what is called civilization .”

[email protected] Author and journalist Clemente Ferrer has led a distinguished career in Spain in the fields of advertising and public relations. He is currently President of the European Institute of Marketing.

Extend vocal opposition and criticism to all corrupt and ineffective political leaders in Liberia; not just Ellen

By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh Ellen_Johnson_Sirleaf-State_Department_2012-

 

Four equally important eye-catching events occurred in Liberia and the U.S., in the months of August and September of this year that got my attention.

They are: Sea erosion near New Kru Town (Porpor Beach) that left 2,000 Liberians homeless. Twenty-five thousand Liberian students failed the University of Liberia’s entrance examination, the resignation of Robert Sirleaf, son of President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, formerly CEO of the National Oil Company of Liberia (NOCAL), and the rise of MOLAC, the anti-corruption activist group that has constantly demonstrated against Liberian government officials visiting the United States.

Interestingly enough, all of these incidents occurred on President Sirleaf’s watch.

Had Liberia actually been a genuine democratic republic with an educated electorate and a responsible legislative branch, there would be calls right now for legislative hearings to know what really happened to possibly hold people accountable.

When that happens people are fired, and there are calls for Sirleaf to resign for her poor handling of the erosion crisis, the mass failings of students during the entrance examination, and the hiring of her sons to head such lucrative and influential positions.

Remember, son Charles Sirleaf, is deputy at the Central Bank of Liberia; Fumba Sirleaf heads the National Security Agency, and other family members of the president are scattered in lucrative and sensitive sections of the Liberian government.

However, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf claims the hiring of her sons and other family members is not nepotism. If the hiring of her sons and other family members is not nepotism, I swear, I will drink Lysol or Sassywood to prove her wrong.

Right now, however, Madam Sirleaf is off the hook; and there is no accountability and transparency in government, because Liberians either don’t care or bought the story that “the old ma is trying her best, so leave her alone” as if doing her best is the most she can offer the Liberian people in these trying times.

Even though Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is the highest political leader in Liberia right now who is often criticized for all things bad in that country, other leaders beneath her in the legislature and also in the judiciary and the various ministries, are equally as corrupt and inefficient in carrying out their official duties.

As activists, it seems we are only vocal when the name of the person in our bulls-eye is Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.

The question now is are we selective in our incendiary condemnation of Madam Sirleaf and the Sirleaf administration, but look the other way when our family, our beloved friends/former classmates, “Bo” or “comrades” from the University of Liberia, or from our activist days occupies cabinet/legislative positions?

However, in spite of their (our) individual flaws – because we all have our own - real or imaginary skeletons in our closets that require a magnifying glass to dissect, it is amazing to see courage when there is one, in the face of mounting reactionary opposition from opportunistic agents of the ruling political class.

Indeed, as we have seen in the course of these few months, the group, MOLAC, has held its own grounds to get the message out regarding rampant corruption and the obvious lack of leadership in the Sirleaf administration, at a time when there is outright silence from other activist groups in the Diaspora.

Even though MOLAC (Movement of Liberians Against Corruption) recently picked up the baton and raised the much-needed alarm on the Sirleaf administration at a time when we needed them most, let it be crystal clear that MOLAC did not invent grass roots’ activist politics, and does not have a monopoly on progressive activism either against the current government, future government or against past Liberian governments.

From what I know, activist groups in every sphere in the past and present – from organized groups, progressive individuals on the listserv (Internet), to opinion/editorial writers worked hard to mount pressure on past administrations; and also on the Sirleaf administration to change the way they govern Liberia.

This is and has been a collective effort carried out by patriotic Liberians who wants to see their country or ancestral home liberated from the cold, corrupt and blood-dripping hands of dictatorial pirates masquerading as democratic leaders.

Now that Ellen Johnson Sirleaf has shown a broad spectrum of the world her lack of leadership and ineptitude for the way she has badly governed Liberia, made her predecessors, Tubman, Tolbert, Doe and Taylor (in death and in prison) to look remarkably presidential and better leaders at home and abroad.

As public opposition from MOLAC and others mount on the Sirleaf administration, unnecessary distractions from reactionary administration agents seemed to be on the rise. On the rise also are visiting government officials who are making ubiquitous public relations rounds that paints Madam Sirleaf as angelic and effective, even though the price of a bag of rice, the nation’s staple, has risen from $50.00 to $75.00; at a time when most Liberians are being paid in Liberty Liberian dollars, and are also being told that their national currency is the worthless “Liberty.”

The battle to get rid of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and the Sirleaf clan non-violently continues, and the imposition of a stooge or Ellenite as heir apparent on the Liberian people at the end of Ellen’s term in 2017, should not and will not be accepted under the sun.

However, political activists have enough reasons to oppose a bad government, in this case, the current Liberian government.

When opposition politics turns into selective opposition because of natural hatred of a political leader, can turn me off. That’s because I am opposed to and am not interested in selective criticism of political leaders. When leaders are corrupt, ineffective and insensitive, those bad leaders (including friends, political partisans and family members) must be condemned, ridiculed and removed from office.

In the past and present, some political activists are only bent on criticizing the leadership in Liberia and personalities who are not their friends and family members. These activists will quickly wine and dine with their friends and family members who are traveling government officials, and are reticent when those individuals hold influential political posts in Liberia. This is wrong. This is opportunism. This is cherry picking.

This is not the way to go!

MOLAC or any activist/opposition group will quickly loose my support if the leadership turns into an only Ellen-bashing group. Our vocal opposition should not only be against Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, but also against any elected and appointed leader who violates the trusts of the Liberian people.